• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在使用多模态数据采集系统的真实世界数据库中,心率、β-受体阻滞剂剂量与冠状动脉疾病患者预后的关系。

Relationships Among Heart Rate, β-Blocker Dosage, and Prognosis in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease in a Real-World Database Using a Multimodal Data Acquisition System.

机构信息

Jichi Medical University School of Medicine.

Precision Inc.

出版信息

Circ J. 2023 Jan 25;87(2):336-344. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-22-0314. Epub 2022 Oct 7.

DOI:10.1253/circj.CJ-22-0314
PMID:36216562
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The optimal heart rate (HR) and optimal dose of β-blockers (BBs) in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) have been unclear. We sought to clarify the relationships among HR, BB dose, and prognosis in patients with CAD using a multimodal data acquisition system.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We evaluated the data for 8,744 CAD patients who underwent cardiac catheterization from 6 university hospitals and the National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center and who were registered using the Clinical Deep Data Accumulation System. Patients were divided into quartile groups based on their HR at discharge: Q1 (HR <60 beats/min), Q2 (HR 60-66 beats/min), Q3 (HR 67-74 beats/min), and Q4 (HR ≥75 beats/min). Among patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and patients with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS), those in Q4 (HR ≥75 beats/min) had a significantly greater incidence of major adverse cardiac and cerebral events (MACCE) compared with those in Q1 (ACS patients: hazard ratio 1.65, P=0.001; CCS patients: hazard ratio 1.45, P=0.019). Regarding the use of BBs (n=4,964), low-dose administration was significantly associated with MACCE in the ACS group (hazard ratio 1.41, P=0.012), but not in patients with CCS after adjustment for covariates.

CONCLUSIONS

HR ≥75 beats/min was associated with worse outcomes in patients with CCS or ACS.

摘要

背景

冠心病患者的最佳心率(HR)和β受体阻滞剂(BB)剂量仍不明确。我们使用多模态数据采集系统,旨在明确 HR、BB 剂量与冠心病患者预后之间的关系。

方法和结果

我们评估了来自 6 所大学医院和国家心肺血管中心的 8744 例接受心脏导管检查并使用临床深度数据采集系统登记的冠心病患者的数据。根据出院时的 HR 将患者分为四分位组:Q1(HR<60 次/分)、Q2(HR 60-66 次/分)、Q3(HR 67-74 次/分)和 Q4(HR≥75 次/分)。在急性冠脉综合征(ACS)和慢性冠脉综合征(CCS)患者中,Q4(HR≥75 次/分)组发生主要不良心脑血管事件(MACCE)的发生率明显高于 Q1 组(ACS 患者:风险比 1.65,P=0.001;CCS 患者:风险比 1.45,P=0.019)。关于 BB 的使用(n=4964),在调整协变量后,低剂量 BB 与 ACS 组的 MACCE 显著相关(风险比 1.41,P=0.012),但在 CCS 患者中不相关。

结论

HR≥75 次/分与 ACS 或 CCS 患者的预后不良相关。

相似文献

1
Relationships Among Heart Rate, β-Blocker Dosage, and Prognosis in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease in a Real-World Database Using a Multimodal Data Acquisition System.在使用多模态数据采集系统的真实世界数据库中,心率、β-受体阻滞剂剂量与冠状动脉疾病患者预后的关系。
Circ J. 2023 Jan 25;87(2):336-344. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-22-0314. Epub 2022 Oct 7.
2
Heart rate control in an unselected consecutive population of outpatients with stable coronary artery disease: Analysis of the CARDIf Study Cohort.在稳定型冠心病的未选择连续门诊人群中进行心率控制:CARDIf 研究队列分析。
Angiology. 2010 Nov;61(8):763-7. doi: 10.1177/0003319710369102. Epub 2010 May 12.
3
Impact of persistent subclinical hypothyroidism on clinical outcomes in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的非 ST 段抬高急性冠状动脉综合征患者亚临床甲状腺功能减退持续状态对临床结局的影响。
Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2022 Jan;96(1):70-81. doi: 10.1111/cen.14613. Epub 2021 Oct 12.
4
[Status of β-blocker use and heart rate control in Chinese patients with stable coronary artery disease].[中国稳定型冠状动脉疾病患者β受体阻滞剂使用情况及心率控制状况]
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2016 Jan;44(1):19-26. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3758.2016.01.006.
5
[Age-related differences in the management and outcome of acute coronary syndrome under the chest pain center model: a multicenter retrospective study].胸痛中心模式下急性冠状动脉综合征管理与结局的年龄相关差异:一项多中心回顾性研究
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2021 Mar;33(3):318-323. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20200806-00565.
6
Impact of an acute coronary syndrome pathway in achieving target heart rate and utilization of evidence-based doses of beta-blockers.急性冠脉综合征治疗路径对达标心率的影响和β受体阻滞剂的证据剂量的应用。
Am J Ther. 2012 Nov;19(6):397-402. doi: 10.1097/MJT.0b013e3182068d91.
7
Acute hemodynamic effects of landiolol, an ultra-short-acting beta-blocker, in patients with acute coronary syndrome: preliminary study.急性冠状动脉综合征患者应用超短效β受体阻滞剂拉替洛尔的急性血液动力学效应:初步研究。
J Cardiol. 2012 Oct;60(4):252-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2012.06.010. Epub 2012 Jul 25.
8
Achievement of guideline-recommended target blood pressure is associated with reducing the risk of hemorrhagic and ischemic stroke in Japanese coronary artery disease patients -the CLIDAS study.在日本冠状动脉疾病患者中,达到指南推荐的目标血压与降低出血性和缺血性中风风险相关——CLIDAS研究
Hypertens Res. 2025 Feb;48(2):632-639. doi: 10.1038/s41440-024-01902-5. Epub 2024 Sep 19.
9
Serial Heart Rates, Guideline-Directed Beta Blocker Use, and Outcomes in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction.射血分数降低的慢性心力衰竭患者的连续心率、指南指导的β受体阻滞剂使用情况及预后
Am J Cardiol. 2017 Sep 1;120(5):803-808. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.05.052. Epub 2017 Jun 15.
10
Combination of Nicorandil and Beta-Adrenergic Receptor Blockers in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease: A Real-World Observational Study.尼可地尔与β-肾上腺素能受体阻滞剂联合应用于冠心病患者:一项真实世界观察性研究
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2023 Jan-Dec;28:10742484231197559. doi: 10.1177/10742484231197559.

引用本文的文献

1
Usefulness of the AHEAD score for prediction of all-cause death in patients with acute and chronic coronary syndromes.AHEAD评分对急性和慢性冠状动脉综合征患者全因死亡预测的有用性。
Int J Cardiol Cardiovasc Risk Prev. 2025 Jun 20;26:200457. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcrp.2025.200457. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
Development and validation of an in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events risk model for young patients with acute coronary syndrome: a retrospective cohort study.急性冠状动脉综合征年轻患者院内主要不良心血管事件风险模型的建立与验证:一项回顾性队列研究
PeerJ. 2025 May 26;13:e19513. doi: 10.7717/peerj.19513. eCollection 2025.
3
Analysis of Personalized Cardiovascular Drug Therapy: From Monitoring Technologies to Data Integration and Future Perspectives.
个性化心血管药物治疗分析:从监测技术到数据整合及未来展望
Biosensors (Basel). 2025 Mar 17;15(3):191. doi: 10.3390/bios15030191.
4
Changes in systolic blood pressure during hospitalisation and bleeding events after percutaneous coronary intervention.住院期间收缩压的变化及经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的出血事件。
Open Heart. 2024 Dec 23;11(2):e002987. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2024-002987.
5
Relationship between the number of drugs used during percutaneous coronary intervention and adverse events in patients with chronic coronary syndrome: Analysis of CLIDAS database.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗期间用药数量与慢性冠状动脉综合征患者不良事件的关系:CLIDAS数据库分析
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2024 Sep 12;54:101507. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2024.101507. eCollection 2024 Oct.
6
Achievement of guideline-recommended target blood pressure is associated with reducing the risk of hemorrhagic and ischemic stroke in Japanese coronary artery disease patients -the CLIDAS study.在日本冠状动脉疾病患者中,达到指南推荐的目标血压与降低出血性和缺血性中风风险相关——CLIDAS研究
Hypertens Res. 2025 Feb;48(2):632-639. doi: 10.1038/s41440-024-01902-5. Epub 2024 Sep 19.
7
Change in pulse pressure and cardiovascular outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention: The CLIDAS study.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后脉压变化与心血管结局:CLIDAS研究
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2024 May 24;53:101430. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2024.101430. eCollection 2024 Aug.
8
No standard modifiable cardiovascular risk factors in acute myocardial infarction: prevalence, pathophysiology, and prognosis.急性心肌梗死中无标准可调节心血管危险因素:患病率、病理生理学和预后。
Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2024 Oct;39(4):403-411. doi: 10.1007/s12928-024-01022-4. Epub 2024 Jun 17.
9
How should we treat high-normal blood pressure and pre-atrial fibrillation?我们应该如何治疗血压略高于正常范围以及房颤前期?
Hypertens Res. 2024 Aug;47(8):2225-2227. doi: 10.1038/s41440-024-01736-1. Epub 2024 May 24.
10
Impact of heart failure severity and major bleeding events after percutaneous coronary intervention on subsequent major adverse cardiac events.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后心力衰竭严重程度和主要出血事件对后续主要不良心脏事件的影响。
Int J Cardiol Cardiovasc Risk Prev. 2023 Jun 25;18:200193. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcrp.2023.200193. eCollection 2023 Sep.