• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经典型膀胱外翻和泄殖腔外翻患者截骨术后的骨科并发症:一项对比研究。

Orthopedic complications after osteotomy in patients with classic bladder exstrophy and cloacal exstrophy: a comparative study.

作者信息

Sholklapper Tamir N, Crigger Chad, Haney Nora, Khandge Preeya, Wu Wayland, Sponseller Paul D, Gearhart John P

机构信息

Robert D. Jeffs Division of Pediatric Urology, James Buchanan Brady Urological Institutions, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Charlotte Bloomberg Children's Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.

出版信息

J Pediatr Urol. 2022 Oct;18(5):586.e1-586.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2022.09.005. Epub 2022 Sep 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.jpurol.2022.09.005
PMID:36216696
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The addition of pelvic osteotomy to the armamentarium of tools for correction of classic bladder exstrophy (CBE) and cloacal exstrophy (CE) has undeniably served as one of the most effective advancements in improving the likelihood of successful primary bladder closure. Osteotomy-related complications have been studied and documented extensively in patients with CBE, yet evaluation remains limited in CE concordant with its relative rarity.

OBJECTIVE

To compare orthopedic complications in patients with CBE and CE who underwent primary bladder closure with osteotomy.

METHODS

A prospectively maintained, IRB-approved database of 1401 exstrophy-epispadias patients was reviewed for patients with CBE or CE after primary closure and pelvic osteotomy performed at a single institution from 1975 to 2021. Failed closure was defined as dehiscence, bladder prolapse, or vesicocutaneous fistula at any point. Surgery or anesthesia-related complications were captured within 6 weeks of osteotomy or closure.

RESULTS

A total of 146 patients were included in the analysis with 109 and 37 patients with CBE and CE, respectively. Between the CBE and CE cohorts, there were significant differences in median age at primary closure (68 days [IQR 10-260] vs 597 [448-734]; p < 0.001), diastasis width (4 cm IQR [3.8-4.6] vs 6.1 [5.0-7.2]; p < 0.001), osteotomy at time of closure (99.1% vs 75.7%; p < 0.001), and utilization of external hip fixation (67.9% vs 89.2%; p = 0.011). There was no significant difference by gender, osteotomy technique, or hip immobilization technique. Regarding exstrophy closure outcomes, there were 5 failures in the CBE group and 1 in the CE group (p = 1.000). Complications were experienced in 38.5% and 56.8% of CBE and CE patients (p = 0.054) with a significant difference in orthopedic complications (primarily consisting of superficial pin-site infections) between the cohorts (4.6% vs 16.2%, p = 0.031). There was no significant difference in grade 3 or higher complications between cohorts (5.5% vs 13.5%, p = 0.147).

DISCUSSION

This was the first study comparing orthopedic complications after osteotomy between CBE and CE, providing valuable insight into which factors vary among cohorts and which are associated with increased complication rates. Despite availability of high case numbers for these rare disorders, the analysis continued to be limited sample size and missing data for retrospective analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

While exstrophy closure success and overall complications rates are similar in patients with CBE and CE, patients with CE experience more superficial pin-site infections after pelvic osteotomy. External hip fixation may be associated with the increase in orthopedic complications, though further research is required to elucidate the underlying cause of these complications.

摘要

背景

在经典膀胱外翻(CBE)和泄殖腔外翻(CE)的矫正工具中增加骨盆截骨术无疑是提高一期膀胱关闭成功率最有效的进展之一。CBE患者的截骨相关并发症已得到广泛研究和记录,但由于CE相对罕见,其评估仍然有限。

目的

比较接受一期膀胱关闭并进行截骨术的CBE和CE患者的骨科并发症。

方法

回顾了一个前瞻性维护、经机构审查委员会批准的数据库,该数据库包含1401例膀胱外翻-尿道上裂患者,这些患者于1975年至2021年在单一机构接受了一期关闭和骨盆截骨术。关闭失败定义为在任何时间出现裂开、膀胱脱垂或膀胱皮肤瘘。手术或麻醉相关并发症在截骨术或关闭术后6周内记录。

结果

共有146例患者纳入分析,其中CBE患者109例,CE患者37例。在CBE组和CE组之间,一期关闭时的中位年龄(68天[四分位间距10 - 260] vs 597[448 - 734];p < 0.001)、耻骨分离宽度(4 cm四分位间距[3.8 - 4.6] vs 6.1[5.0 - 7.2];p < 0.001)、关闭时的截骨术(99.1% vs 75.7%;p < 0.001)以及外固定架的使用(67.9% vs 89.2%;p = 0.011)存在显著差异。在性别、截骨技术或髋关节固定技术方面无显著差异。关于膀胱外翻关闭结果,CBE组有5例失败,CE组有1例失败(p = 1.000)。CBE和CE患者的并发症发生率分别为38.5%和56.8%(p = 0.054),两组间骨科并发症(主要为浅表针道感染)有显著差异(4.6% vs 16.2%,p = 0.031)。两组间3级及以上并发症无显著差异(5.5% vs 13.5%,p = 0.147)。

讨论

这是第一项比较CBE和CE截骨术后骨科并发症的研究,为各队列之间哪些因素存在差异以及哪些因素与并发症发生率增加相关提供了有价值的见解。尽管这些罕见疾病有大量病例,但分析样本量仍然有限且存在回顾性分析的数据缺失。

结论

虽然CBE和CE患者的膀胱外翻关闭成功率和总体并发症发生率相似,但CE患者在骨盆截骨术后出现更多浅表针道感染。外固定架可能与骨科并发症增加有关,不过需要进一步研究以阐明这些并发症的潜在原因。

相似文献

1
Orthopedic complications after osteotomy in patients with classic bladder exstrophy and cloacal exstrophy: a comparative study.经典型膀胱外翻和泄殖腔外翻患者截骨术后的骨科并发症:一项对比研究。
J Pediatr Urol. 2022 Oct;18(5):586.e1-586.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2022.09.005. Epub 2022 Sep 15.
2
Osteotomy in the newborn classic bladder exstrophy patient: A comparative study.新生儿经典膀胱外翻患者的截骨术:一项对比研究。
J Pediatr Urol. 2021 Aug;17(4):482.e1-482.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2021.04.009. Epub 2021 Apr 22.
3
Multi-staged vs Single-staged Pelvic Osteotomy in the Modern Treatment of Cloacal Exstrophy: Bridging the Gap.多阶段与单阶段骨盆截骨术在 Cloacal Exstrophy 现代治疗中的比较:弥合差距。
J Pediatr Surg. 2023 Dec;58(12):2308-2312. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2023.09.003. Epub 2023 Sep 9.
4
Newborn exstrophy closure without osteotomy: Is there a role?不进行截骨术的新生儿膀胱外翻闭合术:有作用吗?
J Pediatr Urol. 2016 Feb;12(1):51.e1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2015.07.010. Epub 2015 Sep 5.
5
Complications of bladder closure in cloacal exstrophy: Do osteotomy and reoperative closure factor in?泄殖腔外翻膀胱关闭术的并发症:截骨术和再次手术关闭术是否有影响?
J Pediatr Surg. 2017 Nov;52(11):1836-1841. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.12.002. Epub 2016 Dec 9.
6
Predictors and outcomes of perioperative blood transfusions in classic bladder exstrophy repair: A single institution study.经典膀胱外翻修复术围手术期输血的预测因素和结果:单机构研究。
J Pediatr Urol. 2018 Oct;14(5):430.e1-430.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2018.04.025. Epub 2018 Jun 7.
7
Safety and efficacy of staged pelvic osteotomies in the modern treatment of cloacal exstrophy.分期骨盆截骨术在先天性直肠阴道瘘现代治疗中的安全性和有效性。
J Pediatr Urol. 2014 Dec;10(6):1244-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2014.06.018. Epub 2014 Aug 12.
8
Predictors of a successful primary bladder closure in cloacal exstrophy: A multivariable analysis.泄殖腔外翻一期膀胱关闭成功的预测因素:多变量分析
J Pediatr Surg. 2019 Mar;54(3):491-494. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2018.06.030. Epub 2018 Jul 6.
9
Pelvic and lower extremity immobilization for cloacal exstrophy bladder and abdominal closure in neonates and older children.新生儿及大龄儿童泄殖腔外翻膀胱和腹壁关闭术的盆腔及下肢固定术
J Pediatr Surg. 2018 Nov;53(11):2160-2163. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.11.066. Epub 2017 Dec 27.
10
Modern Management of the Failed Bladder Exstrophy Closure: A 50-yr Experience.膀胱外翻修复术失败的现代管理:50 年经验。
Eur Urol Focus. 2020 Mar 15;6(2):383-389. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2018.09.008. Epub 2018 Oct 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Classic Bladder Exstrophy - Timing of initial closure and technical highlights.经典膀胱外翻——初次闭合的时机及技术要点
Afr Urol. 2024 Jun;4(se1):S11-S15. doi: 10.36303/auj.0150.