Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Department of Surgery, Baltimore, Maryland.
University of Texas Health San Antonio Joe R. and Teresa Lozano Long School of Medicine, San Antonio, Texas.
J Surg Educ. 2022 Nov-Dec;79(6):e109-e115. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2022.08.004. Epub 2022 Oct 8.
Across the last several years, numerous surgical departments and societies have focused on addressing the lack of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) in the field. Since the Association of Program Directors in Surgery (APDS) Diversity and Inclusion Taskforce was created in 2017 (and solidified as a formal committee in 2018, herein referred to as the APDS-DIC), it has sought to address gaps in diversity at various phases of training and development from medical student to surgical leader.
In follow-up to a 2018 study that benchmarked leadership demographics of the APDS, this study analyzed how the APDS' efforts have aligned with recommended DEI strategies and whether this produced demographic changes in organizational leadership.
Fifteen years (2008-2022) of publicly available APDS annual meeting program data and APDS membership lists were analyzed. Leadership positions in the organization were examined by officer, program/vice chair, executive committee, and board of directors. A 2-tailed T-test compared differences in the average proportion of leaders from specific demographic groups before and after the APDS-DIC inception (2008-2016 vs. 2017-2022).
APDS has 724 unique faculty and 140 resident members. The majority of both groups identified as White (68% of faculty and 58% of residents). Over 15 years, there have been 307 available leadership positions held by 67 individuals. All presidents and president-elect positions have been held by White surgeons; nearly 80% have been men. The average proportion of female leaders and the average proportion of racial/ethnic minority leaders were both significantly higher after implementation of the APDS-DIC in 2017 (p=0.0009 for gender and p=0.036 for racial/ethnic minorities).
The APDS' commitment to DEI efforts and establishment of the APDS-DIC in 2017 was associated with a significant increase in women and non-White minorities in organizational leadership positions. The specific role of the APDS-DIC in propelling surgeons from underrepresented groups into leadership and promoting key DEI efforts is broadly applicable to other surgical organizations.
在过去的几年中,许多外科部门和学会都专注于解决该领域缺乏多样性、公平性和包容性(DEI)的问题。自 2017 年成立外科医师协会计划主任协会(APDS)多样性和包容工作组(并于 2018 年正式确定为一个正式委员会,以下简称 APDS-DIC)以来,它一直致力于解决从医学生到外科领导各个培训和发展阶段的多样性差距。
继 2018 年对 APDS 领导层人口统计学进行基准研究之后,本研究分析了 APDS 的努力如何与推荐的 DEI 策略保持一致,以及这是否导致组织领导层的人口统计学变化。
分析了 15 年(2008-2022 年)可公开获得的 APDS 年会项目数据和 APDS 会员名单。通过官员、项目/副主席、执行委员会和董事会来检查组织中的领导职位。使用双尾 T 检验比较了在 APDS-DIC 成立前后(2008-2016 年与 2017-2022 年)特定人口统计学群体的领导比例的差异。
APDS 有 724 名独特的教职员工和 140 名住院医师。这两个群体的大多数人都认为自己是白人(教职员工中 68%,住院医师中 58%)。在 15 年中,有 307 个可用的领导职位由 67 人担任。所有主席和候任主席的职位都由白人外科医生担任;近 80%的人是男性。在 2017 年实施 APDS-DIC 后,女性领导的平均比例和种族/少数民族领导的平均比例均显著提高(性别方面 p=0.0009,种族/少数民族方面 p=0.036)。
APDS 对 DEI 工作的承诺以及 2017 年 APDS-DIC 的成立与组织领导职位中女性和非白人民族/少数民族的显著增加有关。APDS-DIC 在推动代表性不足的群体进入领导层和促进关键 DEI 工作方面的具体作用广泛适用于其他外科组织。