• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

创伤、普通外科发病率和死亡率会议的标准化:在秘鲁制定和传播“工具包”。

Standardization of Trauma, General Surgical Morbidity and Mortality Conferences: Development and Dissemination of a "Toolkit" in Peru.

机构信息

Alberto Hurtado School of Medicine, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Av. Honorio Delgado 430, Lima, Peru.

Postdoc, University of Washington, 4333 Brooklyn Ave NE, Seattle, WA, USA.

出版信息

World J Surg. 2023 Jan;47(1):61-71. doi: 10.1007/s00268-022-06752-1. Epub 2022 Oct 10.

DOI:10.1007/s00268-022-06752-1
PMID:36216894
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9726785/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Morbidity and Mortality (M&M) conferences allow clinicians to review adverse events and identify areas for improvement. There are few reports of structured M&M conferences in low- and middle-income countries and no report of collaborative efforts to standardize them.

METHODS

The present study aims to gather general surgeons representing most of Peru's urban surgical care and, in collaboration, with trauma quality improvement experts develop a M&M conferences toolkit with the expectation that its diffusion impacts their reported clinical practice. Fourteen general surgeons developed a toolkit as part of a working group under the auspices of the Peruvian General Surgery Society. After three years, we conducted an anonymous written questionnaire to follow-up previous observations of quality improvement practices.

RESULTS

A four-component toolkit was developed: Toolkit component #1: Conference logistics and case selection; Toolkit component #2: Documenting form; Toolkit component #3: Presentation template; and Toolkit component #4: Code of conduct. The toolkit was disseminated to 10 hospitals in 2016. Its effectiveness was evaluated by comparing the results of surveys on quality improvement practices conducted in 2016, before toolkit dissemination (101 respondents) and 2019 (105 respondents). Lower attendance was reported by surgeons in 2019. However, in 2019, participants more frequently described "improve the system" as the perceived objective of M&M conferences (70.5% vs. 38.6% in 2016; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

We established a toolkit for the national dissemination of a standardized M&M conference. Three years following the initial assessment in Peru, we found similar practice patterns except for increased reporting of "system improvement" as the goal of M&M conferences.

摘要

背景

发病率和死亡率(M&M)会议使临床医生能够审查不良事件并确定改进领域。在中低收入国家,很少有关于结构化 M&M 会议的报告,也没有关于协作标准化这些会议的报告。

方法

本研究旨在汇集秘鲁大部分城市外科护理的普通外科医生,并与创伤质量改进专家合作,开发一个 M&M 会议工具包,希望其传播能够影响他们报告的临床实践。14 名普通外科医生作为秘鲁普通外科学会下属工作组的一部分开发了一个工具包。三年后,我们进行了一项匿名书面问卷调查,以跟踪之前对质量改进实践的观察。

结果

开发了一个由四个组件组成的工具包:工具包组件#1:会议后勤和病例选择;工具包组件#2:记录表格;工具包组件#3:演示模板;和工具包组件#4:行为准则。该工具包于 2016 年分发给 10 家医院。通过比较 2016 年(101 名受访者)和 2019 年(105 名受访者)在工具包传播前和传播后进行的质量改进实践调查结果来评估其效果。2019 年报告的外科医生出席率较低。然而,在 2019 年,参与者更频繁地将“改善系统”描述为 M&M 会议的预期目标(70.5%比 2016 年的 38.6%;p<0.001)。

结论

我们为全国推广标准化的 M&M 会议制定了一个工具包。在秘鲁进行初始评估三年后,我们发现除了更多地报告“系统改进”作为 M&M 会议的目标外,实践模式相似。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f452/9726785/d578a414438c/268_2022_6752_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f452/9726785/256b3dbc9b6e/268_2022_6752_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f452/9726785/5a6ad5840efb/268_2022_6752_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f452/9726785/b037bacd7a5b/268_2022_6752_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f452/9726785/4cd2b546f0f4/268_2022_6752_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f452/9726785/d578a414438c/268_2022_6752_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f452/9726785/256b3dbc9b6e/268_2022_6752_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f452/9726785/5a6ad5840efb/268_2022_6752_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f452/9726785/b037bacd7a5b/268_2022_6752_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f452/9726785/4cd2b546f0f4/268_2022_6752_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f452/9726785/d578a414438c/268_2022_6752_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Standardization of Trauma, General Surgical Morbidity and Mortality Conferences: Development and Dissemination of a "Toolkit" in Peru.创伤、普通外科发病率和死亡率会议的标准化:在秘鲁制定和传播“工具包”。
World J Surg. 2023 Jan;47(1):61-71. doi: 10.1007/s00268-022-06752-1. Epub 2022 Oct 10.
2
Status of trauma quality improvement programs in the Andean region: What foundation do we have to build on.安第斯地区创伤质量改进项目的现状:我们有什么可依赖的基础。
Injury. 2017 Sep;48(9):1985-1993. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.03.003. Epub 2017 Apr 7.
3
Status of trauma quality improvement programs in the Americas: a survey of trauma care providers.美洲创伤质量改进项目的现状:对创伤护理提供者的一项调查
J Surg Res. 2017 Dec;220:213-222. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.06.035. Epub 2017 Aug 2.
4
National Multispecialty Survey Results: Comparing Morbidity and Mortality Conference Practices within and outside Otolaryngology.全国多专科调查结果:比较耳鼻喉科内外的发病率和死亡率会议实践。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018 Feb;158(2):273-279. doi: 10.1177/0194599817737993. Epub 2017 Oct 24.
5
Mixed-Methods Assessment of Trauma and Acute Care Surgical Quality Improvement Programs in Peru.秘鲁创伤与急性护理外科质量改进项目的混合方法评估
World J Surg. 2017 Apr;41(4):963-969. doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3832-3.
6
Assessment of the contribution of morbidity and mortality conferences to quality and safety improvement: a survey of participants' perceptions.发病率和死亡率会议对质量与安全改进贡献的评估:参与者认知的调查
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 May 11;16:176. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1431-5.
7
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
8
Toward Best Practices for Surgical Morbidity and Mortality Conferences: A Mixed Methods Study.迈向手术发病率和死亡率会议的最佳实践:一项混合方法研究。
J Surg Educ. 2018 Jan-Feb;75(1):33-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.07.002. Epub 2017 Jul 15.
9
Surgeons' and Trauma Care Physicians' Perception of the Impact of the Globalization of Medical Education on Quality of Care in Lima, Peru.秘鲁利马的外科医生和创伤护理医生对医学教育全球化对医疗质量影响的看法。
JAMA Surg. 2017 Mar 1;152(3):251-256. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4073.
10
A Survey of the Surgical Morbidity and Mortality Conference in the United States and Canada: A Dying Tradition or the Key to Modern Quality Improvement?美国和加拿大外科发病率与死亡率会议调查:是行将消逝的传统还是现代质量改进的关键?
J Surg Educ. 2021 May-Jun;78(3):927-933. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2020.10.008. Epub 2020 Nov 1.

本文引用的文献

1
Status of trauma quality improvement programs in the Andean region: What foundation do we have to build on.安第斯地区创伤质量改进项目的现状:我们有什么可依赖的基础。
Injury. 2017 Sep;48(9):1985-1993. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.03.003. Epub 2017 Apr 7.
2
Mixed-Methods Assessment of Trauma and Acute Care Surgical Quality Improvement Programs in Peru.秘鲁创伤与急性护理外科质量改进项目的混合方法评估
World J Surg. 2017 Apr;41(4):963-969. doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3832-3.
3
Uptake of the World Health Organization's trauma care guidelines: a systematic review.
世界卫生组织创伤护理指南的采用情况:一项系统综述
Bull World Health Organ. 2016 Aug 1;94(8):585-598C. doi: 10.2471/BLT.15.162214. Epub 2016 May 13.
4
An estimate of the number of lives that could be saved through improvements in trauma care globally.全球范围内通过改善创伤护理可拯救的生命数量估计。
World J Surg. 2012 May;36(5):959-963. doi: 10.1007/s00268-012-1459-6.
5
Establishing the evidence base for trauma quality improvement: a collaborative WHO-IATSIC review.建立创伤质量改进的证据基础:世界卫生组织-国际创伤系统协作审查
World J Surg. 2009 May;33(5):1075-86. doi: 10.1007/s00268-009-9959-8.
6
Strengthening care for injured persons in less developed countries: a case study of Ghana and Mexico.加强欠发达国家伤者的护理:以加纳和墨西哥为例的案例研究。
Inj Control Saf Promot. 2003 Mar-Jun;10(1-2):45-51. doi: 10.1076/icsp.10.1.45.14114.
7
Surgical morbidity and mortality meetings.外科手术并发症及死亡率研讨会
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1988 Nov;70(6):363-5.