Smith J R, King W W, Tang W Y, Metreweli C
Clin Radiol. 1987 Jul;38(4):345-9. doi: 10.1016/s0009-9260(87)80205-2.
Parotid computed tomography (CT) combined with sialography is an established method of determining intrinsic from extrinsic tumours in and around the parotid gland. However, differentiation of deep from superficial lobe tumours lacks reliability. Various anatomical landmarks including Stensen's duct, the retromandibular vein, the styloid process, the posterior belly of the digastric muscle and more recently an arc 8.5 mm from the posterior border of the mandible have been used to predict the course of the facial nerve and hence divide the parotid into its deep and superficial portions. Our recent experience of CT in 17 cases of intrinsic parotid tumours and the results of surgery have been reviewed in an attempt to assess the reliability of these various landmarks. In 14 out of the 17 cases (82%) the relationship of the Stensen's duct to the tumour was well shown, and correct differentiation of deep from superficial lobe tumours could be made. We conclude that the relationship of the tumour to the Stensen's duct is most accurate in differentiating tumours of the deep and superficial lobes of the parotid.
腮腺计算机断层扫描(CT)联合涎管造影是确定腮腺及其周围肿瘤是源于腮腺内部还是外部的一种成熟方法。然而,区分腮腺深叶和浅叶肿瘤的可靠性不足。包括腮腺导管、下颌后静脉、茎突、二腹肌后腹等各种解剖标志,以及最近发现的距下颌骨后缘8.5毫米的一条弧线,都被用于预测面神经的走行,从而将腮腺分为深叶和浅叶。我们回顾了近期对17例腮腺原发性肿瘤进行CT检查的经验及手术结果,试图评估这些不同解剖标志的可靠性。在17例病例中的14例(82%)中,腮腺导管与肿瘤的关系显示良好,能够正确区分深叶和浅叶肿瘤。我们得出结论,在区分腮腺深叶和浅叶肿瘤方面,肿瘤与腮腺导管的关系最为准确。