F. Edward Herbert School of Medicine, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA.
John Sealy School of Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, TX 77555, USA.
Mil Med. 2023 Jul 22;188(7-8):e2489-e2495. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usac293.
Medical physician residency program websites often serve as the first contact for any prospective applicant. No analysis of military residency program websites has yet been conducted, in contrast to their civilian counterparts. This study evaluated all military residency programs certified by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) 2021-2022 to determine program website comprehensiveness and accessibility and identify areas for improvement.
A list of military residency programs in the USA was compiled using Defense Health Agency Graduate Medical Education resources together with the ACGME database. A total of 15 objective website criteria covering education and recruitment content were assessed by two independent evaluators. Accessibility was also scored. Programs' website scores were compared by geographic location, specialty affiliation, type of institution partnership, and program size. Analysis was performed with descriptive statistics and comparison via an unpaired t-test or Kruskal-Wallis analysis, as appropriate.
A total of 124 military residency program websites were evaluated with a range of scores from 0 to 15 out of 15 possible points. Six programs had no identifiable website. All three services were represented with 43% joint-service programs. Content concerning physician education and development was more widely available than content directed toward the recruitment of applicants. The number of residency program websites reporting each content criterion varied greatly, but overall, no single service had a significantly higher score across their residencies' websites. Significant variation occurred among individual specialties (P < .05) but there was no significant difference in surgical and nonsurgical specialties. Civilian-associated programs (18 programs, 14.5%) were associated with significantly greater website comprehensiveness scored best on informatics measures for recruitment and performed 64% better than military-only programs overall.
Program information in an accessible website platform allows prospective applicants to gain comprehensive perspectives of programs during the application process without reliance on personal visits and audition rotations. Limitations to in-person experiences, such as those caused by reductions in travel and concern for student safety during the global pandemic caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, may be alleviated by accessible virtual information. Our results indicate that there is opportunity for all military residency programs to improve their websites and better recruit applicants through understanding their audience and optimizing their reach online.
医学住院医师培训计划网站通常是任何潜在申请人的第一联系点。与他们的平民同行相比,目前还没有对军事住院医师培训计划网站进行分析。本研究评估了所有 2021-2022 年经研究生医学教育认证委员会 (ACGME) 认证的军事住院医师培训计划,以确定计划网站的全面性和可访问性,并确定需要改进的领域。
使用国防卫生局研究生医学教育资源和 ACGME 数据库编制了一份美国军事住院医师培训计划清单。由两名独立评估员评估了涵盖教育和招聘内容的 15 项客观网站标准。还对可访问性进行了评分。根据地理位置、专业隶属关系、机构合作类型和计划规模比较了计划的网站得分。使用描述性统计和适当的配对 t 检验或 Kruskal-Wallis 分析进行分析。
共评估了 124 个军事住院医师培训计划网站,每个网站的得分范围为 0 到 15 分,满分为 15 分。有 6 个计划没有可识别的网站。所有三个服务部门都有 43%的联合服务计划。医生教育和发展方面的内容比针对申请人招聘的内容更广泛。报告每个内容标准的住院医师培训计划网站数量差异很大,但总体而言,没有一个服务部门在其住院医师培训计划的网站上得分明显更高。个别专业之间存在显著差异(P<0.05),但手术和非手术专业之间没有显著差异。与平民相关的计划(18 个计划,占 14.5%)在信息学招聘方面的综合得分最高,整体表现比仅军事相关计划好 64%。
在可访问的网站平台上提供计划信息,使潜在申请人能够在申请过程中全面了解计划,而无需依赖个人访问和试听轮次。由于 SARS-CoV-2 病毒大流行导致旅行减少和学生安全担忧等原因,面对面体验可能会受到限制,而可访问的虚拟信息可能会缓解这些限制。我们的研究结果表明,所有军事住院医师培训计划都有机会通过了解受众并优化在线影响力来改善其网站并更好地招募申请人。