Cohen Samuel A, Cohen Landon E, Perez Felipe D, Macario Alex, Xie James
is a medical student, is a Clinical Assistant Professor, is a professor, is a Clinical Assistant Professor in the Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA.
is a is a Medical Student at the Keck School of Medicine at the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.
J Educ Perioper Med. 2022 Jan 1;24(1):E683. doi: 10.46374/volxxiv_issue1_xie. eCollection 2022 Jan-Mar.
The shift to virtual interviews during the COVID-19 pandemic has elevated the vital role of Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education residency program websites in conveying information to applicants. The purpose of our study was to assess the recruitment, education, and diversity and inclusion content on websites for anesthesiology residency programs. Second, we aimed to test the hypothesis that the content scores of websites are higher in programs with more National Institutes of Health funding, in programs that are university-based versus community-based, and in larger programs, as measured by number of residents.
Two independent reviewers evaluated the websites of the 159 anesthesiology residency programs accredited by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education for the presence (yes/no) of 12 recruitment, 6 education, and 8 diversity and inclusion criteria. Multiple linear regression was used to determine which program factors were most associated with total website content score.
Anesthesiology residency program websites contained a mean of 12.9 (SD = 3.4; range, 3-21) of the 26 study-defined criteria. The most common recruitment, education, and diversity and inclusion criteria were, respectively, program description, rotation information, and community demographics. Controlling for program factors, a university-based affiliation ( = .016) was associated with higher website content scores.
There is large variation in the recruitment, education, and diversity and inclusion content on anesthesiology residency program websites nationally. Since program websites averaged only half of criteria, this may provide an impetus for programs to modify their websites, which may inform applicant decisions about which programs align with their training and career goals.
在新冠疫情期间转向虚拟面试,提升了研究生医学教育认证委员会住院医师项目网站在向申请人传达信息方面的重要作用。我们研究的目的是评估麻醉学住院医师项目网站上的招生、教育以及多元化与包容性内容。其次,我们旨在检验以下假设:根据美国国立卫生研究院的资金投入多少、是否为大学附属医院(与社区医院相对)以及住院医师数量衡量的规模大小,资金投入更多、基于大学的项目以及规模更大的项目,其网站内容得分更高。
两名独立评审员评估了研究生医学教育认证委员会认证的159个麻醉学住院医师项目的网站,以确定是否存在(是/否)12项招生标准、6项教育标准以及8项多元化与包容性标准。使用多元线性回归来确定哪些项目因素与网站总内容得分最相关。
麻醉学住院医师项目网站平均包含26项研究定义标准中的12.9项(标准差 = 3.4;范围为3 - 21项)。最常见的招生、教育以及多元化与包容性标准分别是项目描述、轮转信息和社区人口统计信息。在控制项目因素后,大学附属医院的隶属关系(P = 0.016)与更高的网站内容得分相关。
全国范围内麻醉学住院医师项目网站在招生、教育以及多元化与包容性内容方面存在很大差异。由于项目网站平均仅满足一半的标准,这可能促使项目修改其网站,这可能会帮助申请人决定哪些项目符合他们的培训和职业目标。