Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemical Engineering, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Carretera Utrera km.1, 41013, Seville, Spain.
Swedish Collegium for Advanced Study, Thunbergsvägen 2, SE-75238, Uppsala, Sweden.
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2023 Feb;98(1):352-375. doi: 10.1111/brv.12910. Epub 2022 Oct 12.
Evolutionary theory has made large impacts on our understanding and management of the world, in part because it has been able to incorporate new data and new insights successfully. Nonetheless, there is currently a tension between certain biological phenomena and mainstream evolutionary theory. For example, how does the inheritance of molecular epigenetic changes fit into mainstream evolutionary theory? Is niche construction an evolutionary process? Is local adaptation via habitat choice also adaptive evolution? These examples suggest there is scope (and perhaps even a need) to broaden our views on evolution. We identify three aspects whose incorporation into a single framework would enable a more generalised approach to the understanding and study of adaptive evolution: (i) a broadened view of extended phenotypes; (ii) that traits can respond to each other; and (iii) that inheritance can be non-genetic. We use causal modelling to integrate these three aspects with established views on the variables and mechanisms that drive and allow for adaptive evolution. Our causal model identifies natural selection and non-genetic inheritance of adaptive parental responses as two complementary yet distinct and independent drivers of adaptive evolution. Both drivers are compatible with the Price equation; specifically, non-genetic inheritance of parental responses is captured by an often-neglected component of the Price equation. Our causal model is general and simplified, but can be adjusted flexibly in terms of variables and causal connections, depending on the research question and/or biological system. By revisiting the three examples given above, we show how to use it as a heuristic tool to clarify conceptual issues and to help design empirical research. In contrast to a gene-centric view defining evolution only in terms of genetic change, our generalised approach allows us to see evolution as a change in the whole causal structure, consisting not just of genetic but also of phenotypic and environmental variables.
进化理论对我们理解和管理世界产生了重大影响,部分原因是它能够成功地纳入新的数据和新的见解。尽管如此,目前某些生物现象与主流进化理论之间存在紧张关系。例如,分子表观遗传变化的遗传如何适应主流进化理论?生态位构建是一个进化过程吗?通过栖息地选择进行的局部适应也是适应性进化吗?这些例子表明,我们有必要拓宽对进化的看法。我们确定了三个方面,如果将这些方面纳入一个单一的框架中,将能够更全面地理解和研究适应性进化:(i)扩展表型的广泛观点;(ii)性状可以相互响应;和(iii)遗传可以是非遗传的。我们使用因果建模将这三个方面与驱动和允许适应性进化的变量和机制的既定观点结合起来。我们的因果模型将自然选择和适应性亲本反应的非遗传遗传确定为适应性进化的两个互补但不同且独立的驱动因素。这两个驱动因素都与普赖斯方程兼容;具体来说,亲本反应的非遗传遗传由普赖斯方程中经常被忽视的一个组成部分来捕获。我们的因果模型是通用的和简化的,但可以根据研究问题和/或生物系统灵活调整变量和因果关系。通过重新审视上面给出的三个例子,我们展示了如何将其用作启发式工具来澄清概念问题并帮助设计经验研究。与仅根据遗传变化定义进化的基因中心观点相反,我们的广义方法使我们能够将进化视为整个因果结构的变化,不仅包括遗传,还包括表型和环境变量。