Suppr超能文献

乌干达西南部三个地区基层医疗设施抗生素处方合理性评估

An Evaluation of Antibiotic Prescription Rationality at Lower Primary Healthcare Facilities in Three Districts of South-Western Uganda.

作者信息

Nantongo Hanifah, Kiguba Ronald, Batwala Vincent, Mukonzo Jackson

机构信息

Department of Nursing, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda.

Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Makerere University, Makerere, Uganda.

出版信息

J Multidiscip Healthc. 2022 Oct 6;15:2249-2259. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S384297. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Antimicrobial resistance is now one of the leading five causes of death globally. This study evaluated the rationality of antibiotic prescriptions at lower primary care levels in three districts of Southwestern Uganda.

METHODS

This prospective cross-sectional study reviewed 9899 antibiotic prescriptions at 39 health centers following a drug delivery cycle by National Medical Stores in three phases (19 days each on average). Phase 1 started 3 days after delivery, mid-way (Phase 2) and towards the end (Phase 3). The proportion of rationally prescribed antibiotics was determined using a modified criterion by Badar and in reference to Uganda Clinical Guidelines (UCG). Using multivariate logistic regression, the factors associated with rational prescription were determined with 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

Seven of every 10 antibiotic prescriptions were irrational. Half the prescriptions were made by unauthorized personnel (nurses) and many of the pediatric prescriptions (916, 46.5%) did not bear body weight measurements to guide appropriate dosing. Also, the proportion of rational prescriptions in reference to UCG, 2016 was very low (3387, 34.2%). However, a high proportion of antibiotic prescriptions were legibly written (9462, 95.7%), prescribed by generic names (9083, 91.8%) and had a diagnosis (9677, 97.8%) indicated. Multivariate logistic analysis showed that; availability of medicines (phase 1) (phase 2 AOR=1.14, 95% CI:1.02-1.28, phase 3, AOR=1.23, 95% CI:1.1-1.38), legibly written prescription (AOR=0.61, 95% CI: 0.47-0.78), indication of a date on the prescription (AOR=0.56, 95% CI0.38-0.81) and being a medical officer were factors associated with rational antibiotic prescription.

CONCLUSION

We observed a high rate of irrational prescription in the study sites and the majority of these were by unauthorized personnel. A review of antibiotic use policies and focused interventions is crucial in these settings.

摘要

目的

抗菌素耐药性现已成为全球五大主要死因之一。本研究评估了乌干达西南部三个地区基层医疗水平较低的医疗机构抗生素处方的合理性。

方法

这项前瞻性横断面研究在39个医疗中心对9899份抗生素处方进行了审查,这些处方是在国家医疗用品商店分三个阶段(每个阶段平均19天)的药品配送周期之后开具的。第一阶段在配送后3天开始,中间阶段(第二阶段)和接近尾声阶段(第三阶段)。使用巴达尔修改后的标准并参照乌干达临床指南(UCG)来确定合理开具抗生素的比例。通过多变量逻辑回归确定与合理处方相关的因素,并给出95%的置信区间。

结果

每10份抗生素处方中有7份不合理。一半的处方是由未经授权的人员(护士)开具的,而且许多儿科处方(916份,占46.5%)没有记录体重测量数据以指导适当的剂量。此外,参照2016年UCG的合理处方比例非常低(3387份,占34.2%)。然而,很大一部分抗生素处方书写清晰(9462份,占95.7%),采用通用名开具(9083份,占91.8%),并且注明了诊断(9677份,占97.8%)。多变量逻辑分析表明;药品的可获得性(第一阶段)(第二阶段调整后比值比=1.14,95%置信区间:1.02-1.28,第三阶段,调整后比值比=1.23,95%置信区间:1.1-1.38)、书写清晰的处方(调整后比值比=0.61,95%置信区间:0.47-0.78)、处方上注明日期(调整后比值比=0.56,95%置信区间0.38-0.81)以及作为医疗官员是与合理抗生素处方相关的因素。

结论

我们在研究地点观察到了较高的不合理处方率,其中大多数是由未经授权的人员开具的。在这些环境中,对抗生素使用政策进行审查并采取针对性干预措施至关重要。

相似文献

1
An Evaluation of Antibiotic Prescription Rationality at Lower Primary Healthcare Facilities in Three Districts of South-Western Uganda.
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2022 Oct 6;15:2249-2259. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S384297. eCollection 2022.
2
Antibiotic prescription practices among prescribers for children under five at public health centers III and IV in Mbarara district.
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 28;15(12):e0243868. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243868. eCollection 2020.
5
A retrospective audit of antibiotic prescriptions in primary health-care facilities in Eastern Region, Ghana.
Health Policy Plan. 2016 Mar;31(2):250-8. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czv048. Epub 2015 Jun 4.
7
Use and prescription of antibiotics in primary health care settings in China.
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Dec;174(12):1914-20. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.5214.
9
Factors related to rational antibiotic prescriptions in community health centers in Depok City, Indonesia.
J Infect Public Health. 2017 Jan-Feb;10(1):41-48. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2016.01.012. Epub 2016 Mar 4.

本文引用的文献

1
Inappropriate use of antibiotics and its predictors in pediatric patients admitted at the Central Hospital of Nampula, Mozambique.
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2022 Jun 2;11(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s13756-022-01115-w.
2
Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: a systematic analysis.
Lancet. 2022 Feb 12;399(10325):629-655. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02724-0. Epub 2022 Jan 19.
4
An Evaluation of Antibiotic Prescribing Practices in a Rural Refugee Settlement District in Uganda.
Antibiotics (Basel). 2021 Feb 9;10(2):172. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10020172.
6
Antibiotic prescription practices among prescribers for children under five at public health centers III and IV in Mbarara district.
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 28;15(12):e0243868. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243868. eCollection 2020.
7
Non-Medical prescribing policies: A global scoping review.
Health Policy. 2020 Jul;124(7):721-726. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.04.015. Epub 2020 May 23.
8
Nurse prescribing of medicines in 13 European countries.
Hum Resour Health. 2019 Dec 9;17(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s12960-019-0429-6.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验