Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Strahlenther Onkol. 2023 Dec;199(12):1128-1139. doi: 10.1007/s00066-022-02009-x. Epub 2022 Oct 13.
Despite new treatment options, melanoma continues to have an unfavorable prognosis. DNA damage response (DDR) inhibitors are a promising drug class, especially in combination with chemotherapy (CT) or radiotherapy (RT). Manipulating DNA damage repair during RT is an opportunity to exploit the genomic instability of cancer cells and may lead to radiosensitizing effects in tumors that could improve cancer therapy.
A panel of melanoma-derived cell lines of different origin were used to investigate toxicity-related clonogenic survival, cell death, and cell cycle distribution after treatment with a kinase inhibitor (KI) against ATM (AZD0156) or ATR (VE-822, berzosertib), irradiation with 2 Gy, or a combination of KI plus ionizing radiation (IR). Two fibroblast cell lines generated from healthy skin tissue were used as controls.
Clonogenic survival indicated a clear radiosensitizing effect of the ATM inhibitor (ATMi) AZD0156 in all melanoma cells in a synergistic manner, but not in healthy tissue fibroblasts. In contrast, the ATR inhibitor (ATRi) VE-822 led to additive enhancement of IR-related toxicity in most of the melanoma cells. Both inhibitors mainly increased cell death induction in combination with IR. In healthy fibroblasts, VE-822 plus IR led to higher cell death rates compared to AZD0156. A significant G2/M block was particularly induced in cancer cells when combining AZD0156 with IR.
ATMi, in contrast to ATRi, resulted in synergistic radiosensitization regarding colony formation in melanoma cancer cells, while healthy tissue fibroblasts were merely affected with respect to cell death induction. In connection with an increased number of melanoma cells in the G2/M phase after ATMi plus IR treatment, ATMi seems to be superior to ATRi in melanoma cancer cell treatments when combined with RT.
尽管有新的治疗选择,黑色素瘤的预后仍然不佳。DNA 损伤反应(DDR)抑制剂是一种很有前途的药物类别,尤其是与化疗(CT)或放疗(RT)联合使用时。在 RT 过程中操纵 DNA 损伤修复是利用癌细胞基因组不稳定性的机会,可能导致肿瘤产生放射增敏作用,从而改善癌症治疗效果。
使用不同来源的黑色素瘤衍生细胞系进行研究,以研究用 ATM(AZD0156)或 ATR(VE-822,berzosertib)激酶抑制剂治疗、2Gy 照射或激酶抑制剂加电离辐射(IR)联合治疗后与毒性相关的克隆存活、细胞死亡和细胞周期分布。将来自健康皮肤组织的两种成纤维细胞系用作对照。
克隆存活表明,ATM 抑制剂(ATMi)AZD0156 在所有黑色素瘤细胞中均以协同方式表现出明显的放射增敏作用,但在健康组织成纤维细胞中没有。相比之下,ATR 抑制剂(ATRi)VE-822 导致大多数黑色素瘤细胞中 IR 相关毒性的相加增强。两种抑制剂主要通过与 IR 联合增加细胞死亡诱导。在健康成纤维细胞中,与 AZD0156 相比,VE-822 加 IR 导致更高的细胞死亡率。与 IR 联合使用时,AZD0156 特别诱导癌细胞中明显的 G2/M 期阻滞。
与 ATRi 相反,ATMi 导致黑色素瘤癌细胞集落形成的协同放射增敏作用,而健康组织成纤维细胞仅在细胞死亡诱导方面受到影响。与 ATMi 加 IR 治疗后黑色素瘤细胞中 G2/M 期细胞数量增加相关,ATMi 与 RT 联合用于黑色素瘤癌细胞治疗时似乎优于 ATRi。