Isberner Nora, Gesierich Anja, Balakirouchenane David, Schilling Bastian, Aghai-Trommeschlaeger Fatemeh, Zimmermann Sebastian, Kurlbaum Max, Puszkiel Alicja, Blanchet Benoit, Klinker Hartwig, Scherf-Clavel Oliver
Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Strasse 6, 97080 Würzburg, Germany.
Department of Dermatology, Venerology and Allergology, University Hospital Würzburg, Josef-Schneider-Strasse 2, 97080 Würzburg, Germany.
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Sep 20;14(19):4566. doi: 10.3390/cancers14194566.
Patients treated with dabrafenib and trametinib for BRAF-mutant melanoma often experience dose reductions and treatment discontinuations. Current knowledge about the associations between patient characteristics, adverse events (AE), and exposure is inconclusive. Our study included 27 patients (including 18 patients for micro-sampling). Dabrafenib and trametinib exposure was prospectively analyzed, and the relevant patient characteristics and AE were reported. Their association with the observed concentrations and Bayesian estimates of the pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of (hydroxy-)dabrafenib and trametinib were investigated. Further, the feasibility of at-home sampling of capillary blood was assessed. A population pharmacokinetic (popPK) model-informed conversion model was developed to derive serum PK parameters from self-sampled capillary blood. Results showed that (hydroxy-)dabrafenib or trametinib exposure was not associated with age, sex, body mass index, or toxicity. Co-medication with P-glycoprotein inducers was associated with significantly lower trough concentrations of trametinib ( = 0.027) but not (hydroxy-)dabrafenib. Self-sampling of capillary blood was feasible for use in routine care. Our conversion model was adequate for estimating serum PK parameters from micro-samples. Findings do not support a general recommendation for monitoring dabrafenib and trametinib but suggest that monitoring can facilitate making decisions about dosage adjustments. To this end, micro-sampling and the newly developed conversion model may be useful for estimating precise PK parameters.
接受达拉非尼和曲美替尼治疗的BRAF突变型黑色素瘤患者常出现剂量减少和治疗中断。目前关于患者特征、不良事件(AE)与暴露之间关联的认识尚无定论。我们的研究纳入了27例患者(包括18例用于微量采样的患者)。对达拉非尼和曲美替尼的暴露情况进行了前瞻性分析,并报告了相关的患者特征和不良事件。研究了它们与观察到的(羟基)达拉非尼和曲美替尼药代动力学(PK)参数浓度及贝叶斯估计值之间的关联。此外,评估了在家采集毛细血管血样的可行性。建立了一个群体药代动力学(popPK)模型指导的转换模型,以从自行采集的毛细血管血样中推导出血清PK参数。结果显示,(羟基)达拉非尼或曲美替尼的暴露与年龄、性别、体重指数或毒性无关。与P-糖蛋白诱导剂合用与曲美替尼的谷浓度显著降低相关( = 0.027),但与(羟基)达拉非尼无关。在家自行采集毛细血管血样可用于常规护理。我们的转换模型足以从微量样本中估计血清PK参数。研究结果不支持对监测达拉非尼和曲美替尼提出一般性建议,但表明监测有助于做出剂量调整决策。为此,微量采样和新开发的转换模型可能有助于估计精确的PK参数。