Chandrapalan Subashini, Khasawneh Farah, Singh Baljit, Lewis Stephen, Turvill James, Persaud Krishna, Arasaradnam Ramesh P
University Hospital of Coventry and Warwickshire, Coventry CV2 2DX, UK.
Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK.
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Oct 9;14(19):4951. doi: 10.3390/cancers14194951.
(1) Background: The service capacity for colonoscopy remains constrained, and while efforts are being made to recover elective services, polyp surveillance remains a challenge. (2) Methods: This is a multi-centre study recruiting patients already on polyp surveillance. Stool and urine samples were collected for the faecal immunochemical test (FIT) and volatile organic compounds (VOC) analysis, and all participants then underwent surveillance colonoscopy. (3) Results: The sensitivity and specificity of VOC for the detection of a high-risk finding ((≥2 premalignant polyps including ≥1 advanced polyp or ≥5 premalignant polyps) were 0.94 (95% CI, 0.88 to 0.98) and 0.69 (95% CI, 0.64 to 0.75) respectively. For FIT, the sensitivity was (≥10 µg of haemoglobin (Hb) / g faeces) 0.54 (95% CI, 0.43 to 0.65) and the specificity was 0.79 (95% CI, 0.73 to 0.84). The probability reduction for having a high-risk finding following both negative VOC and FIT will be 24% if both tests are applied sequentially. (4) Conclusion: The diagnostic performance of VOC is superior to FIT for the detection of a high-risk finding. The performance further improves when VOC is applied together with FIT sequentially (VOC first and then FIT). VOC alone or the combination of VOC and FIT can be used as a triage tool for patients awaiting colonoscopy within a polyp surveillance population, especially in resource-constrained healthcare systems.
(1) 背景:结肠镜检查的服务能力仍然受限,尽管正在努力恢复择期服务,但息肉监测仍是一项挑战。(2) 方法:这是一项多中心研究,招募已在接受息肉监测的患者。收集粪便和尿液样本进行粪便免疫化学检测(FIT)和挥发性有机化合物(VOC)分析,然后所有参与者均接受监测结肠镜检查。(3) 结果:VOC检测高危发现(≥2个癌前息肉,包括≥1个高级别息肉或≥5个癌前息肉)的敏感性和特异性分别为0.94(95%可信区间,0.88至0.98)和0.69(95%可信区间,0.64至0.75)。对于FIT,敏感性(≥10微克血红蛋白(Hb)/克粪便)为0.54(95%可信区间,0.43至0.65),特异性为0.79(95%可信区间,0.73至0.84)。如果依次应用这两种检测,VOC和FIT均为阴性后出现高危发现的概率降低24%。(4) 结论:对于高危发现的检测,VOC的诊断性能优于FIT。当VOC与FIT依次联合应用(先VOC后FIT)时,性能进一步提高。单独使用VOC或VOC与FIT的组合可作为息肉监测人群中等待结肠镜检查患者的分诊工具,尤其是在资源有限的医疗系统中。