Azam Aqeem, Sapru Karuna, Jones Andrew M, Vasant Dipesh H, Kelly Anne-Marie, Horsman Graham, Bright-Thomas Rowland J, Iqbal Javaid, Barry Peter J
Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
The University of Manchester, Manchester, England, UK.
BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2025 Sep 9;12(1):e001954. doi: 10.1136/bmjgast-2025-001954.
People with cystic fibrosis (pwCF) are at significantly increased risk of colorectal cancer (CRC), prompting international recommendations for earlier screening with colonoscopy. The utility of faecal immunochemical testing (FIT) as a screening adjunct in pwCF remains unclear. This study evaluates FIT's diagnostic performance and uptake within a CRC screening programme in a UK CF centre.
PwCF aged ≥40 years were invited in person to participate in a screening protocol including FIT and colonoscopy. FIT results were interpreted using three thresholds: ≥10 µg Hb/g (primary), ≥80 µg Hb/g and ≥120 µg Hb/g. Colonoscopy findings and polyp histology were recorded.
Of 113 eligible patients, 66 (58.4%) returned FIT, 49 (43.4%) had FIT and colonoscopy, and 27 (23.9%) underwent colonoscopy only. Colonic polyps were detected in 27.6% (21/76), which were predominantly adenomatous, and no CRCs were detected. For polyp detection, FIT demonstrated poor sensitivity (14%) and modest specificity (86%) at the 10 µg Hb/g threshold. Quantitative FIT values did not correlate with polyp presence (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.48). Bowel preparation was generally adequate (mean Boston Bowel Preparation Scale 6.8), with a low repeat colonoscopy rate (14.5%).
In this study, no cancer was detected in 76 consecutive eligible individuals who underwent colonoscopy. In 49 patients who had both FIT and colonoscopy, FIT did not aid colonic polyp detection, showing low sensitivity and no correlation between faecal haemoglobin and adenoma detection. Given the high adenoma prevalence, the limitations of FIT and the poor FIT return rate, colonoscopy should remain the preferred modality for CRC screening in pwCF.
囊性纤维化患者(pwCF)患结直肠癌(CRC)的风险显著增加,这促使国际上建议更早地进行结肠镜筛查。粪便免疫化学检测(FIT)作为pwCF筛查辅助手段的效用仍不明确。本研究评估了FIT在英国一家囊性纤维化中心的结直肠癌筛查项目中的诊断性能及接受情况。
邀请年龄≥40岁的pwCF亲自参与包括FIT和结肠镜检查的筛查方案。FIT结果采用三个阈值进行解读:≥10μg血红蛋白/克(主要阈值)、≥80μg血红蛋白/克和≥120μg血红蛋白/克。记录结肠镜检查结果和息肉组织学情况。
在113名符合条件的患者中,66名(58.4%)返回了FIT检测结果,49名(43.4%)进行了FIT和结肠镜检查,27名(23.9%)仅接受了结肠镜检查。在76名接受检查者中,27.6%(21/76)检测出结肠息肉,主要为腺瘤性息肉,未检测到结直肠癌。对于息肉检测,在10μg血红蛋白/克阈值时,FIT显示出较差的敏感性(14%)和中等的特异性(86%)。FIT定量值与息肉存在情况无关(受试者操作特征曲线下面积为0.48)。肠道准备总体充分(平均波士顿肠道准备评分6.8),结肠镜复查率较低(14.5%)。
在本研究中,76名连续接受结肠镜检查的符合条件个体均未检测到癌症。在49名同时进行FIT和结肠镜检查的患者中,FIT无助于结肠息肉检测,敏感性较低,粪便血红蛋白与腺瘤检测之间无相关性。鉴于腺瘤患病率高、FIT的局限性以及FIT返回率低,结肠镜检查仍应是pwCF结直肠癌筛查的首选方式。