Department of Social Work and Criminology, Faculty of Health and Occupational Studies, University of Gävle, 80176 Gävle, Sweden.
Faculty of Literacy, Rowan-Cabarrus Community College, Salisbury, NC 28146, USA.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 3;19(19):12669. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912669.
In this paper, we examined how university staff and students coped with challenges related to working or studying from home during the COVID-19 pandemic, and the level of satisfaction with working from home. An online survey was conducted among faculty, staff, and students at universities in 24 countries ( 674). The results show that over 80% of the respondents used multiple coping methods. Three clusters of coping methods were generated through factor analysis: (1) social and health factor, with focus on personal health and the social surrounding, (2) activity factor, i.e., being busy with work or studies, finding up-to-date information about COVID-19, while thinking about what one could do rather than what one could not do, and (3) public health factor, which meant trusting health authorities while avoiding misinformation from sources such as social media. Furthermore, 56% of the respondents were very or somewhat satisfied with working from home. Differences in the methods of coping and satisfaction with working from home highlight the need for employers to prepare for working from home beyond the COVID-19 pandemic.
在本文中,我们研究了在 COVID-19 大流行期间,大学教职员工和学生如何应对在家工作或学习的挑战,以及他们对在家工作的满意度。我们在 24 个国家的大学中对教职员工和学生进行了在线调查(674 人)。结果表明,超过 80%的受访者使用了多种应对方法。通过因子分析生成了三组应对方法:(1)社会和健康因素,关注个人健康和社会环境;(2)活动因素,即忙于工作或学习,寻找有关 COVID-19 的最新信息,同时思考自己能做什么而不是不能做什么;(3)公共卫生因素,这意味着信任卫生当局,同时避免来自社交媒体等来源的错误信息。此外,56%的受访者对在家工作非常满意或比较满意。应对方法和对在家工作的满意度的差异突出表明,雇主需要为 COVID-19 大流行之外的在家工作做好准备。