School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane 4067, Australia.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 6;19(19):12822. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912822.
The health sector in Australia and the ASX100 is lagging far behind in the implementation of carbon management and climate risk analysis. This case study highlights the low quantity and quality of the sector compared to its market weight. The analysis of CDP disclosures for Australian healthcare companies shows this delay and a general lack of interest in the Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures' (TCFD) recommendations. Yet, the physical and transitory risks for these companies do exist. The reasons for this inaction represent a knowledge gap in the literature, but several hypotheses are formulated, such as the lack of pressure from public authorities. At the level of the ten largest healthcare companies in the world, this failure to act is not systemic, so the scope of analysis must be broadened to see a pattern emerging.
澳大利亚的卫生部门和澳大利亚证券交易所 100 指数在实施碳管理和气候风险分析方面远远落后。本案例研究强调了该部门相对于其市场权重的数量和质量都较低。对澳大利亚医疗保健公司 CDP 披露的分析显示了这种延迟,以及对气候相关财务披露特别工作组(TCFD)建议的普遍缺乏兴趣。然而,这些公司确实存在物理和过渡性风险。这种不作为的原因在文献中存在知识差距,但提出了一些假设,例如缺乏来自公共当局的压力。在全球最大的十家医疗保健公司层面,这种不作为并非系统性的,因此必须扩大分析范围,才能看到出现的模式。