Genestreti Paulo R Rizzo, Furtado Remo H M, Salsoso Rocio, Dalçóquio Talia F, Franci Andre, Menezes Fernando R, Caporrino Cesar, Ferrari Aline G, Nakashima Carlos A K, Scanavini Filho Marco A, Lima Felipe G, Giraldez Roberto R C V, Baracioli Luciano M, Nicolau Jose C
Instituto do Coracao (InCor), Unidade de Coronariopatia Aguda, Hospital das Clinicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo (HCFMUSP), Sao Paulo 05403-900, Brazil.
Academic Research Organization, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Sao Paulo 05652-000, Brazil.
J Clin Med. 2022 Sep 29;11(19):5776. doi: 10.3390/jcm11195776.
The management of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) presents several challenges in patients with diabetes, among them the higher rate of recurrent thrombotic events, hyperglycemia and risk of subsequent heart failure (HF). The objective of our study was to evaluate effects of DPP-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) on platelet reactivity (main objective) and cardiac risk markers.
We performed a single-center double-blind randomized trial. A total of 70 patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) with AMI Killip ≤2 on dual-antiplatelet therapy (aspirin plus clopidogrel) were randomized to receive sitagliptin 100 mg or saxagliptin 5 mg daily or matching placebo. Platelet reactivity was assessed at baseline, 4 days (primary endpoint) and 30 days (secondary endpoint) after randomization, using VerifyNow Aspirin™ assay, expressed as aspirin reaction units (ARUs); B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) in pg/mL was assessed at baseline and 30 days after (secondary endpoint).
Mean age was 62.6 ± 8.8 years, 45 (64.3%) male, and 52 (74.3%) of patients presented with ST-segment elevation MI. For primary endpoint, there were no differences in mean platelet reactivity ( = 0.51) between the DPP-4i (8.00 {-65.00; 63.00}) and placebo (-14.00 {-77.00; 52.00}) groups, as well in mean BNP levels ( = 0.14) between DPP-4i (-36.00 {-110.00; 15.00}) and placebo (-13.00 {-50.00; 27.00}). There was no difference between groups in cardiac adverse events.
DPP4 inhibitor did not reduce platelet aggregation among patients with type 2 diabetes hospitalized with AMI. Moreover, the use of DPP-4i did not show an increase in BNP levels or in the incidence of cardiac adverse events. These findings suggests that DPP-4i could be an option for management of T2DM patients with acute MI.
急性心肌梗死(AMI)的管理在糖尿病患者中面临诸多挑战,其中包括复发性血栓事件发生率较高、高血糖以及随后发生心力衰竭(HF)的风险。我们研究的目的是评估二肽基肽酶-4抑制剂(DPP-4i)对血小板反应性(主要目标)和心脏风险标志物的影响。
我们进行了一项单中心双盲随机试验。总共70例2型糖尿病(T2DM)合并AMI Killip≤2且正在接受双联抗血小板治疗(阿司匹林加氯吡格雷)的患者被随机分为每日接受100mg西他列汀或5mg沙格列汀或匹配的安慰剂。在随机分组后的基线、4天(主要终点)和30天(次要终点)使用VerifyNow Aspirin™检测评估血小板反应性,以阿司匹林反应单位(ARUs)表示;在基线和30天后(次要终点)评估以pg/mL为单位的B型利钠肽(BNP)。
平均年龄为62.6±8.8岁,45例(64.3%)为男性,52例(74.3%)患者表现为ST段抬高型心肌梗死。对于主要终点,DPP-4i组(8.00 {-65.00;63.00})和安慰剂组(-14.00 {-77.00;52.00})之间的平均血小板反应性( = 0.51)无差异,DPP-4i组(-36.00 {-110.00;15.00})和安慰剂组(-13.00 {-50.00;27.00})之间的平均BNP水平( = 0.14)也无差异。两组之间的心脏不良事件无差异。
DPP4抑制剂并未降低因AMI住院的2型糖尿病患者的血小板聚集。此外,使用DPP-4i并未显示BNP水平升高或心脏不良事件发生率增加。这些发现表明DPP-4i可能是急性心肌梗死T2DM患者管理的一种选择。