Blum Philipp, Putzer David, Neugebauer Johannes, Neubauer Markus, Süß Markus, Dammerer Dietmar
Department of Trauma Surgery, BG Trauma Center Murnau, Prof.-Küntscher-Str. 8, 82418 Murnau, Germany.
Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstraße 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
J Clin Med. 2022 Oct 3;11(19):5857. doi: 10.3390/jcm11195857.
Background: Massive osteolysis of the proximal femur makes stem revision a challenging procedure. EBRA-FCA provides the opportunity to determine stem migration, which is considered a predictive factor for implant survival. In this study, we aimed to analyze the migration behavior of a modular, distally fixed reconstruction prosthesis. Methods: Applying a retrospective study design, we reviewed all consecutive patients who received a cementless MP reconstruction prosthesis (Waldemar Link GmbH & Co. KG, Hamburg, Germany) at our Department between 2005 and 2019. We reviewed medical histories and performed radiological measurements using EBRA-FCA software. Results: A total of 67 stems in 62 patients (female 26; male 36) fulfilled our inclusion criteria. Mean age at surgery was 68.0 (range 38.7−88.44) years. EBRA migration analysis showed a median subsidence of 1.6 mm (range 0.0−20.6) at 24 months. The angle between stem and femur axis was 0.3° (range 0.0°−2.9°) at final follow-up. No correlation between body mass index and increased subsidence was found (p > 0.05). Overall revision-free rate amounted to 92.5% and revision-free rate for aseptic loosening to 98.5%. Furthermore, no case of material breakage was detected. Conclusions: In summary, the MP reconstruction prosthesis showed low subsidence and reduction in the migration rate over the investigated follow-up. Based on this, the modular stem can be considered as a good therapy option in challenging stem revisions offering various options to address the individual anatomical situation.
股骨近端的大量骨质溶解使翻修手术成为一项具有挑战性的操作。EBRA-FCA提供了确定假体柄迁移的机会,而假体柄迁移被认为是植入物存活的一个预测因素。在本研究中,我们旨在分析一种模块化、远端固定的重建假体的迁移行为。方法:采用回顾性研究设计,我们回顾了2005年至2019年期间在我院接受非骨水泥型MP重建假体(德国汉堡的Waldemar Link GmbH & Co. KG公司生产)的所有连续患者。我们查阅了病史,并使用EBRA-FCA软件进行了放射学测量。结果:62例患者(女性26例;男性36例)共67个假体柄符合我们的纳入标准。手术时的平均年龄为68.0岁(范围38.7 - 88.44岁)。EBRA迁移分析显示,24个月时的中位下沉量为1.6毫米(范围0.0 - 20.6毫米)。末次随访时,假体柄与股骨干轴线的夹角为0.3°(范围0.0° - 2.9°)。未发现体重指数与下沉增加之间存在相关性(p>0.05)。总体无翻修率为92.5%,无菌性松动的无翻修率为98.5%。此外,未检测到材料断裂的病例。结论:总之,在研究的随访期间,MP重建假体显示出低下沉率和迁移率降低。基于此,模块化假体柄可被视为具有挑战性的假体柄翻修中的一种良好治疗选择,它提供了多种选择来应对个体解剖情况。