Speyer Renée, Cordier Reinie, Denman Deborah, Windsor Catriona, Krisciunas Gintas P, Smithard David, Heijnen Bas J
Department Special Needs Education, University of Oslo, 0318 Oslo, Norway.
Curtin School of Allied Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6102, Australia.
J Clin Med. 2022 Oct 7;11(19):5920. doi: 10.3390/jcm11195920.
. Patient self-evaluation is an important aspect in the assessment of dysphagia and comprises both Functional Health Status (FHS) and Health-Related Quality of Life (HR-QoL). As many measures combine both FHS and HR-QoL, disease-related functioning cannot be distinguished from disease-related quality of life as experienced by the patient. Moreover, current patient self-reported measures are limited by poor and incomplete data on psychometric properties. . This study aimed to establish content validity for the development of two new self-reported measures on FHS and HR-QoL in adults with oropharyngeal dysphagia (OD), in line with the psychometric taxonomy and guidelines from the COSMIN group (nsensus-based tandards for the selection of health easurement struments). . Using the Delphi technique, international expert consensus was achieved; participants and patients with dysphagia evaluated relevance, comprehensiveness, and comprehensibility of definitions of relevant constructs (i.e., dysphagia, FHS and HR-QoL) and potential items. . A total of 66 Delphi participants from 45 countries achieved consensus across two rounds. The Delphi study resulted in two prototype measures, the Functional health status measure of Oropharyngeal Dysphagia (FOD) and the health-related Quality of life measure of Oropharyngeal Dysphagia (QOD), consisting of 37 and 25 items, respectively. Minimal revisions were required based on feedback by patients. . This study provides evidence of good content validity for both newly developed prototype measures FOD and QOD. Future studies will continue the process of refining the measures, and evaluate the remaining psychometric properties using both Classic Test Theory (CTT) and Item Response Theory (IRT) models.
患者自我评估是吞咽困难评估的一个重要方面,包括功能健康状况(FHS)和健康相关生活质量(HR-QoL)。由于许多测量方法同时包含FHS和HR-QoL,因此无法区分与疾病相关的功能和患者所体验到的与疾病相关的生活质量。此外,目前患者自我报告的测量方法受到心理测量学特性数据质量差和不完整的限制。本研究旨在根据COSMIN小组(基于共识的健康测量工具选择标准)的心理测量分类法和指南,为开发两种新的关于口咽吞咽困难(OD)成人的FHS和HR-QoL自我报告测量方法建立内容效度。使用德尔菲技术达成了国际专家共识;吞咽困难患者和参与者评估了相关概念(即吞咽困难、FHS和HR-QoL)定义及潜在条目的相关性、全面性和可理解性。来自45个国家的66名德尔菲参与者在两轮中达成了共识。德尔菲研究产生了两种原型测量方法,即口咽吞咽困难功能健康状况测量方法(FOD)和口咽吞咽困难健康相关生活质量测量方法(QOD),分别由37项和25项组成。根据患者反馈只需进行最少修订。本研究为新开发的原型测量方法FOD和QOD提供了良好内容效度的证据。未来的研究将继续完善这些测量方法的过程,并使用经典测试理论(CTT)和项目反应理论(IRT)模型评估其余的心理测量特性。