Suppr超能文献

采用德尔菲技术制定两项针对口咽吞咽困难成人的患者自我报告的功能健康状况(FOD)和健康相关生活质量(QOD)测量指标。

Development of Two Patient Self-Reported Measures on Functional Health Status (FOD) and Health-Related Quality of Life (QOD) in Adults with Oropharyngeal Dysphagia Using the Delphi Technique.

作者信息

Speyer Renée, Cordier Reinie, Denman Deborah, Windsor Catriona, Krisciunas Gintas P, Smithard David, Heijnen Bas J

机构信息

Department Special Needs Education, University of Oslo, 0318 Oslo, Norway.

Curtin School of Allied Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6102, Australia.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2022 Oct 7;11(19):5920. doi: 10.3390/jcm11195920.

Abstract

. Patient self-evaluation is an important aspect in the assessment of dysphagia and comprises both Functional Health Status (FHS) and Health-Related Quality of Life (HR-QoL). As many measures combine both FHS and HR-QoL, disease-related functioning cannot be distinguished from disease-related quality of life as experienced by the patient. Moreover, current patient self-reported measures are limited by poor and incomplete data on psychometric properties. . This study aimed to establish content validity for the development of two new self-reported measures on FHS and HR-QoL in adults with oropharyngeal dysphagia (OD), in line with the psychometric taxonomy and guidelines from the COSMIN group (nsensus-based tandards for the selection of health easurement struments). . Using the Delphi technique, international expert consensus was achieved; participants and patients with dysphagia evaluated relevance, comprehensiveness, and comprehensibility of definitions of relevant constructs (i.e., dysphagia, FHS and HR-QoL) and potential items. . A total of 66 Delphi participants from 45 countries achieved consensus across two rounds. The Delphi study resulted in two prototype measures, the Functional health status measure of Oropharyngeal Dysphagia (FOD) and the health-related Quality of life measure of Oropharyngeal Dysphagia (QOD), consisting of 37 and 25 items, respectively. Minimal revisions were required based on feedback by patients. . This study provides evidence of good content validity for both newly developed prototype measures FOD and QOD. Future studies will continue the process of refining the measures, and evaluate the remaining psychometric properties using both Classic Test Theory (CTT) and Item Response Theory (IRT) models.

摘要

患者自我评估是吞咽困难评估的一个重要方面,包括功能健康状况(FHS)和健康相关生活质量(HR-QoL)。由于许多测量方法同时包含FHS和HR-QoL,因此无法区分与疾病相关的功能和患者所体验到的与疾病相关的生活质量。此外,目前患者自我报告的测量方法受到心理测量学特性数据质量差和不完整的限制。本研究旨在根据COSMIN小组(基于共识的健康测量工具选择标准)的心理测量分类法和指南,为开发两种新的关于口咽吞咽困难(OD)成人的FHS和HR-QoL自我报告测量方法建立内容效度。使用德尔菲技术达成了国际专家共识;吞咽困难患者和参与者评估了相关概念(即吞咽困难、FHS和HR-QoL)定义及潜在条目的相关性、全面性和可理解性。来自45个国家的66名德尔菲参与者在两轮中达成了共识。德尔菲研究产生了两种原型测量方法,即口咽吞咽困难功能健康状况测量方法(FOD)和口咽吞咽困难健康相关生活质量测量方法(QOD),分别由37项和25项组成。根据患者反馈只需进行最少修订。本研究为新开发的原型测量方法FOD和QOD提供了良好内容效度的证据。未来的研究将继续完善这些测量方法的过程,并使用经典测试理论(CTT)和项目反应理论(IRT)模型评估其余的心理测量特性。

相似文献

3
Visuoperceptual Analysis of the Videofluoroscopic Study of Swallowing: An International Delphi Study.
Dysphagia. 2021 Aug;36(4):595-613. doi: 10.1007/s00455-020-10174-3. Epub 2020 Sep 4.
4
Using Classical Test Theory to Determine the Psychometric Properties of the Deglutition Handicap Index.
Dysphagia. 2022 Feb;37(1):65-73. doi: 10.1007/s00455-021-10250-2. Epub 2021 Jan 30.
10
Cultural adaptation and validation of the Norwegian version of the swallowing quality of life questionnaire (SWAL-QOL).
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2019 Dec 5;17(1):179. doi: 10.1186/s12955-019-1248-0.

本文引用的文献

1
Prevalence of dysphagia and risk of pneumonia and mortality in acute stroke patients: a meta-analysis.
BMC Geriatr. 2022 May 13;22(1):420. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-02960-5.
2
3
A Scientometric Review of Rasch Measurement: The Rise and Progress of a Specialty.
Front Psychol. 2019 Oct 22;10:2197. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02197. eCollection 2019.
4
Higher number of items associated with significantly lower response rates in COS Delphi surveys.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Apr;108:110-120. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.12.010. Epub 2018 Dec 15.
5
COSMIN methodology for evaluating the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: a Delphi study.
Qual Life Res. 2018 May;27(5):1159-1170. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1829-0. Epub 2018 Mar 17.
6
COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures.
Qual Life Res. 2018 May;27(5):1147-1157. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1798-3. Epub 2018 Feb 12.
7
Health-Related Quality of Life and Oropharyngeal Dysphagia: A Systematic Review.
Dysphagia. 2018 Apr;33(2):141-172. doi: 10.1007/s00455-017-9844-9. Epub 2017 Sep 2.
9
Psychometric characteristics of health-related quality-of-life questionnaires in oropharyngeal dysphagia.
Dysphagia. 2014 Apr;29(2):183-98. doi: 10.1007/s00455-013-9511-8. Epub 2014 Mar 5.
10
Defining consensus: a systematic review recommends methodologic criteria for reporting of Delphi studies.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Apr;67(4):401-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.12.002.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验