• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

运用经典测量理论评估吞咽障碍指数的心理测量学特性。

Using Classical Test Theory to Determine the Psychometric Properties of the Deglutition Handicap Index.

机构信息

Department Special Needs Education, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

School of Occupational Therapy, Social Work and Speech Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, Australia.

出版信息

Dysphagia. 2022 Feb;37(1):65-73. doi: 10.1007/s00455-021-10250-2. Epub 2021 Jan 30.

DOI:10.1007/s00455-021-10250-2
PMID:33515311
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8844159/
Abstract

The Deglutition Handicap Index (DHI) is a self-report measure for patients at risk of oropharyngeal dysphagia on deglutition-related aspects of functional health status (FHS) and health-related quality of life (HR-QoL). The DHI consists of 30 items which are subsumed within the Symptom, Functional and Emotional subscales. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the DHI using Classic Test Theory according to the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) criteria. A total of 453 patients with dysphagia with different aetiologies were recruited concurrently at two academic hospitals. Dysphagia was confirmed by fiberoptic endoscopic and/or videofluoroscopic evaluation of swallowing. In addition, a healthy control group of 132 participants were recruited. Structural validity was determined using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses and internal consistency by calculating Cronbach's alpha coefficients. Hypothesis testing was evaluated using Mann-Whitney U-tests, linear regression analysis and correlations analysis. Diagnostic performance and receiver operating characteristic curves analysis were calculated. Factor analyses indicated that the DHI is a unidimensional measure. The DHI has good internal consistency with some indication of item redundancy, weak to moderate structural validity and strong hypothesis testing for construct validity. The DHI shows high diagnostic performance as part of criterion validity. These findings support that the DHI is an appropriate choice as a patient self-report measure to evaluate FHS and HR-QoL in dysphagia. Ongoing validation to assess the measure for possible item redundancy and to examine the dimensionality of the DHI using item response theory is recommended.

摘要

吞咽障碍指数(DHI)是一种自评量表,用于评估有发生吞咽困难风险的患者的吞咽相关功能健康状况(FHS)和健康相关生活质量(HR-QoL)。DHI 由 30 个项目组成,分为症状、功能和情绪三个子量表。本研究旨在根据共识标准选择健康测量仪器(COSMIN)标准,使用经典测量理论评估 DHI 的心理测量特性。共有 453 名不同病因的吞咽困难患者在两所学术医院同时入组。吞咽困难通过纤维内镜和/或吞咽视频透视检查得到确认。此外,还招募了 132 名健康对照组参与者。结构效度通过探索性和验证性因子分析以及计算 Cronbach's alpha 系数来评估内部一致性。假设检验采用 Mann-Whitney U 检验、线性回归分析和相关性分析进行评估。还计算了诊断性能和受试者工作特征曲线分析。因子分析表明,DHI 是一种单维度的测量工具。DHI 具有良好的内部一致性,部分项目存在冗余,结构效度较弱到中等,对结构效度的假设检验较强。DHI 在作为标准有效性的一部分时表现出较高的诊断性能。这些发现支持 DHI 是评估吞咽困难患者 FHS 和 HR-QoL 的一种合适的患者自评量表。建议进行进一步的验证,以评估该量表是否存在项目冗余,并使用项目反应理论检验 DHI 的维度结构。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a9ed/8844159/e3bdc200aaee/455_2021_10250_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a9ed/8844159/d1be15e3bcc4/455_2021_10250_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a9ed/8844159/e3bdc200aaee/455_2021_10250_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a9ed/8844159/d1be15e3bcc4/455_2021_10250_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a9ed/8844159/e3bdc200aaee/455_2021_10250_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Using Classical Test Theory to Determine the Psychometric Properties of the Deglutition Handicap Index.运用经典测量理论评估吞咽障碍指数的心理测量学特性。
Dysphagia. 2022 Feb;37(1):65-73. doi: 10.1007/s00455-021-10250-2. Epub 2021 Jan 30.
2
Translation and Validation of the Dysphagia Handicap Index in Hebrew-Speaking Patients.希伯来语患者吞咽障碍指数的翻译与验证。
Dysphagia. 2019 Feb;34(1):63-72. doi: 10.1007/s00455-018-9914-7. Epub 2018 Jun 7.
3
Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Italian Version of the Dysphagia Handicap Index (I-DHI).跨文化调适与义大利版吞咽障碍生活质量问卷(I-DHI)的验证。
Dysphagia. 2022 Oct;37(5):1120-1136. doi: 10.1007/s00455-021-10369-2. Epub 2021 Sep 28.
4
Quality of life in oncological patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia: validity and reliability of the Dutch version of the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory and the Deglutition Handicap Index.头颈部癌吞咽困难患者的生活质量:荷兰版 MD Anderson 吞咽困难指数和吞咽障碍指数的信度和效度。
Dysphagia. 2011 Dec;26(4):407-14. doi: 10.1007/s00455-011-9327-3. Epub 2011 Jan 29.
5
Clinical Usefulness of the Korean Version of the Dysphagia Handicap Index: Reliability, Validity, and Role as a Screening Test.《韩文版吞咽障碍指数量表的临床实用性:信度、效度和筛查测试作用》。
Dysphagia. 2022 Feb;37(1):183-191. doi: 10.1007/s00455-021-10262-y. Epub 2021 Feb 13.
6
Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the European Portuguese Dysphagia Handicap Index.欧洲葡萄牙语吞咽障碍 handicap 指数的跨文化适应与验证
Dysphagia. 2023 Aug;38(4):1072-1079. doi: 10.1007/s00455-022-10527-0. Epub 2022 Oct 7.
7
Translation and Validation of the Dysphagia Handicap Index in Polish-Speaking Patients.波兰语患者吞咽障碍指数的翻译与验证。
Dysphagia. 2023 Aug;38(4):1200-1211. doi: 10.1007/s00455-022-10545-y. Epub 2022 Dec 12.
8
Psychometric characteristics of health-related quality-of-life questionnaires in oropharyngeal dysphagia.口咽吞咽困难患者健康相关生活质量问卷的心理测量学特征
Dysphagia. 2014 Apr;29(2):183-98. doi: 10.1007/s00455-013-9511-8. Epub 2014 Mar 5.
9
Using Rasch Analysis to Evaluate the Reliability and Validity of the Swallowing Quality of Life Questionnaire: An Item Response Theory Approach.运用拉施分析评估吞咽生活质量问卷的信度和效度:一种项目反应理论方法。
Dysphagia. 2018 Aug;33(4):441-456. doi: 10.1007/s00455-017-9873-4. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
10
Development of the Arabic Version of Dysphagia Handicap Index (DHI).吞咽障碍 handicap 指数(DHI)阿拉伯语版本的开发。
Dysphagia. 2014 Aug;29(4):459-67. doi: 10.1007/s00455-014-9528-7. Epub 2014 May 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of the Deglutition Handicap Index.吞咽障碍 handicap 指数土耳其语版本的信度和效度
Dysphagia. 2024 Nov 7. doi: 10.1007/s00455-024-10776-1.
2
UMSARS Versus Laryngoscopy-Based Assessment of Dysphagia.基于UMSARS与喉镜检查的吞咽困难评估
Mov Disord Clin Pract. 2023 Apr 12;10(6):974-979. doi: 10.1002/mdc3.13734. eCollection 2023 Jun.
3
Translation and Validation of the Dysphagia Handicap Index in Polish-Speaking Patients.波兰语患者吞咽障碍指数的翻译与验证。

本文引用的文献

1
Item analysis of the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10) by the Rasch model: a secondary analysis of cross-sectional survey data obtained among community-dwelling elders.运用 Rasch 模型对饮食评估工具(EAT-10)进行项目分析:一项基于社区居住老年人的横断面调查数据的二次分析。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 May 13;18(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01384-2.
2
A Scientometric Review of Rasch Measurement: The Rise and Progress of a Specialty.拉施测量的科学计量学综述:一个专业领域的兴起与发展
Front Psychol. 2019 Oct 22;10:2197. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02197. eCollection 2019.
3
Psychometric Properties of Visuoperceptual Measures of Videofluoroscopic and Fibre-Endoscopic Evaluations of Swallowing: A Systematic Review.
Dysphagia. 2023 Aug;38(4):1200-1211. doi: 10.1007/s00455-022-10545-y. Epub 2022 Dec 12.
4
Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Premature Infant Pain Profile-Revised (PIPP-R) Pain Measurement Scale: Research Protocol.早产儿疼痛行为量表修订版(PIPP-R)的文化调适与验证:研究方案。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 28;19(19):12338. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912338.
5
Short and Long-Term Voice and Swallowing-Related Quality of Life in Patients Who Underwent Total Laryngectomy and Tracheoesophageal Puncture.接受全喉切除术和气管食管穿刺术患者的短期和长期嗓音及吞咽相关生活质量
Cureus. 2022 Aug 2;14(8):e27609. doi: 10.7759/cureus.27609. eCollection 2022 Aug.
视感知测量法在吞咽的视频透视和纤维内镜评估中的心理测量学特性:系统评价。
Dysphagia. 2019 Feb;34(1):2-33. doi: 10.1007/s00455-018-9918-3. Epub 2018 Jul 17.
4
An introduction to Item Response Theory and Rasch Analysis of the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10).饮食评估工具(EAT-10)的项目反应理论与拉施分析介绍
Brain Impair. 2018 Mar;19(Spec Iss 1):91-102. doi: 10.1017/BrImp.2017.31. Epub 2017 Dec 7.
5
COSMIN methodology for evaluating the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: a Delphi study.COSMIN 方法学用于评估患者报告结局测量的内容效度:一项德尔菲研究。
Qual Life Res. 2018 May;27(5):1159-1170. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1829-0. Epub 2018 Mar 17.
6
COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures.COSMIN 患者报告结局测量系统评价指南。
Qual Life Res. 2018 May;27(5):1147-1157. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1798-3. Epub 2018 Feb 12.
7
Using Rasch Analysis to Evaluate the Reliability and Validity of the Swallowing Quality of Life Questionnaire: An Item Response Theory Approach.运用拉施分析评估吞咽生活质量问卷的信度和效度:一种项目反应理论方法。
Dysphagia. 2018 Aug;33(4):441-456. doi: 10.1007/s00455-017-9873-4. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
8
COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures.COSMIN 患者报告结局测量系统评价偏倚风险清单。
Qual Life Res. 2018 May;27(5):1171-1179. doi: 10.1007/s11136-017-1765-4. Epub 2017 Dec 19.
9
Construct validity of the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10).进食评估工具(EAT-10)的建构效度。
Disabil Rehabil. 2019 Mar;41(5):549-559. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1398787. Epub 2017 Nov 9.
10
Validation of the Dutch version of the Swallowing Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (DSWAL-QoL) and the adjusted DSWAL-QoL (aDSWAL-QoL) using item analysis with the Rasch model: a pilot study.使用拉施模型进行项目分析对荷兰版吞咽生活质量问卷(DSWAL-QoL)及调整后的DSWAL-QoL(aDSWAL-QoL)进行验证:一项试点研究。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Apr 7;15(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0639-3.