Ma Aiping, Wang Guangdong, Du Yan, Guo Weixi, Guo Jiaxi, Hu Yi, Bai Dongyu, Huang Huiping, Zhuang Lianjin, Chen Jinhan, Liu Qun
Department of Respiratory and Critical Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Department of Thoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Front Oncol. 2022 Sep 27;12:902955. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.902955. eCollection 2022.
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) coexisting with lung cancer is associated with severe mortality and a worse prognosis. Inflammation plays an important role in common pathogenic pathways and disease progression. However, a few studies have identified the clinical value of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in COPD with lung cancer, which are systemic inflammatory response markers in the blood. This study aimed to determine the association of the NLR or PLR with clinical characteristics and whether NLR or PLR can be diagnostic markers for COPD with lung cancer.
Between 2015 and 2021, we conducted a retrospective analysis of 236 COPD patients with lung cancer and 500 patients without lung cancer (control group). Clinical information, blood routine examination, and spirometry results were collected and analyzed. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to identify the best cutoff point of NLR or PLR. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the association of NLR or PLR with the diagnosis and prognosis of COPD with lung cancer.
Compared to patients in the COPD-only group, patients in the lung cancer group had a higher percentage of current smoking and emphysema, and it was found that NLR or PLR was significantly higher in the lung cancer group. Multivariate analysis showed that age, smoking status, FEV1%pred, emphysema, NLR, and PLR were independent risk factors for lung cancer development in COPD. Furthermore, the high level of NLR or PLR was associated with age over 70 years old, current smoking status, and ineligible surgery treatment. The level of PLR or NLR markedly increased with hypercoagulation status, the severity of airflow limitation, and advanced progression of lung cancer. Additionally, the ROC analysis also revealed that elevated NLR or PLR was an independent predictor of COPD in lung cancer patients, TNM stages IIIB-IV at first diagnosis in lung cancer, and ineligible surgery in lung cancer patients.
Increased NLR or PLR values might be an important and easily measurable inflammation biomarker to predict the diagnosis and severity of lung cancer with COPD.
慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)合并肺癌与严重的死亡率及更差的预后相关。炎症在共同的致病途径和疾病进展中起重要作用。然而,仅有少数研究确定了中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)和血小板与淋巴细胞比值(PLR)在COPD合并肺癌中的临床价值,它们是血液中的全身炎症反应标志物。本研究旨在确定NLR或PLR与临床特征的关联,以及NLR或PLR是否可作为COPD合并肺癌的诊断标志物。
2015年至2021年期间,我们对236例COPD合并肺癌患者和500例无肺癌患者(对照组)进行了回顾性分析。收集并分析了临床信息、血常规检查和肺功能检查结果。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线确定NLR或PLR的最佳截断点。进行多因素逻辑回归分析,以评估NLR或PLR与COPD合并肺癌的诊断及预后的关联。
与单纯COPD组患者相比,肺癌组患者当前吸烟和肺气肿的比例更高,且发现肺癌组的NLR或PLR显著更高。多因素分析表明,年龄、吸烟状态、FEV1%预计值、肺气肿、NLR和PLR是COPD患者发生肺癌的独立危险因素。此外,NLR或PLR高水平与70岁以上年龄、当前吸烟状态及不适合手术治疗相关。PLR或NLR水平随高凝状态、气流受限严重程度及肺癌进展而显著升高。此外,ROC分析还显示,NLR或PLR升高是肺癌患者中COPD、肺癌首次诊断时TNM分期为IIIB-IV期以及肺癌患者不适合手术的独立预测因素。
NLR或PLR值升高可能是预测COPD合并肺癌的诊断及严重程度的重要且易于测量的炎症生物标志物。