Park Eun Joo, Kim Seung Ho, Park Sang Joon, Baek Tae Wook
Taehan Yongsang Uihakhoe Chi. 2021 Jan;82(1):116-127. doi: 10.3348/jksr.2019.0185. Epub 2020 Aug 3.
To evaluate the feasibility of texture analysis of gray-scale ultrasound (US) images for staging of hepatic fibrosis.
Altogether, 167 patients who had undergone routine US and laboratory tests for a fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) index were included. Texture parameters were measured using a dedicated in-house software. Regions of interest were placed in five different segments (3, 5, 6, 7, 8) for each patient. The FIB-4 index was used as the reference standard for hepatic fibrosis grade. Comparisons of the texture parameters between different fibrosis groups were performed with the Student's -test or Mann-Whitney U-test. Diagnostic performance was evaluated by receiver operating curve analysis.
The study population comprised of patients with no fibrosis (FIB-4 < 1.45, = 50), mild fibrosis (1.45 ≤ FIB-4 ≤ 2.35, = 37), moderate fibrosis (2.35 < FIB-4 ≤ 3.25, = 27), and severe fibrosis (FIB-4 > 3.25, = 53). Skewness in hepatic segment 5 showed a difference between patients with no fibrosis and mild fibrosis (0.2392 ± 0.3361, 0.4134 ± 0.3004, respectively, = 0.0109). The area under the curve of skewness for discriminating patients with no fibrosis from those with mild fibrosis was 0.660 (95% confidence interval, 0.551-0.758), with an estimated accuracy, sensitivity, specificity of 64%, 87%, 48%, respectively.
A significant difference was observed regarding skewness in segment 5 between patients with no fibrosis and patients with mild fibrosis.
评估灰度超声(US)图像纹理分析用于肝纤维化分期的可行性。
共纳入167例行常规超声及纤维化-4(FIB-4)指数实验室检查的患者。使用专门的内部软件测量纹理参数。为每位患者在五个不同肝段(3、5、6、7、8)放置感兴趣区。FIB-4指数用作肝纤维化分级的参考标准。采用Student's t检验或Mann-Whitney U检验比较不同纤维化组之间的纹理参数。通过受试者工作特征曲线分析评估诊断性能。
研究人群包括无纤维化患者(FIB-4<1.45,n = 50)、轻度纤维化患者(1.45≤FIB-4≤2.35,n = 37)、中度纤维化患者(2.35<FIB-4≤3.25,n = 27)和重度纤维化患者(FIB-4>3.25,n = 53)。肝段5的偏度在无纤维化患者和轻度纤维化患者之间存在差异(分别为0.2392±0.3361和0.4134±0.3004,P = 0.0109)。区分无纤维化患者和轻度纤维化患者的偏度曲线下面积为0.660(95%置信区间,0.551 - 0.758),估计准确度、灵敏度、特异度分别为64%、87%、48%。
观察到无纤维化患者和轻度纤维化患者在肝段5的偏度方面存在显著差异。