Department of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Istanbul Saglik Bilimleri University Basaksehir Cam and Sakura Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Istanbul Saglik Bilimleri University Basaksehir Cam and Sakura Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Pediatr Int. 2022 Jan;64(1):e15270. doi: 10.1111/ped.15270.
We aimed to compare the frequency of acute kidney injury (AKI) and its effects on mortality and morbidity with different classification systems in pediatric patients who had surgery under cardiopulmonary bypass for congenital heart disease.
This study included children younger than 18 years old who were followed up in the pediatric cardiac intensive care unit between September 1 and December 1, 2020, after congenital heart surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. Each case was categorized postoperatively in terms of AKI using Pediatric-Modified Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss, and End-Stage (pRIFLE), Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN), and Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO). Hospital mortality (developed within the first 30 days postoperatively) and morbidity (longer than 7 days intensive care unit stay) were compared by three model classes. Results were evaluated statistically.
One hundred patients were included in the study. The median age was 3 months (1 day-180 months). Acute kidney injury was diagnosed in 49% of the cases according to the pRIFLE classification. It was diagnosed in 31% of the patients by AKIN classification. It was diagnosed in 41% of the patients with the KDIGO criteria. Morbidity was observed in 25% (n = 25) of all cases. The morbidity predictor was 0.800 for pRIFLE, 0.747 for AKIN and 0.853 for KDIGO by receiver operating characteristics analysis. All three categories predicted morbidity significantly (P < 0.001). Mortality was 10% (n = 10) for all groups. The mortality predictor was 0.783 for pRIFLE, 0.717 for AKIN and 0.794 for KDIGO by receiver operating characteristics analysis, and all three categories predicted mortality significantly (P < 0.001).
Regardless of the three methods used, AKI was commonly detected in pediatric patients undergoing congenital heart surgery. pRIFLE classification diagnosed more patients with AKI than AKIN and KDIGO. The KDIGO and pRIFLE classifications were better in predicting hospital mortality.
我们旨在比较不同分类系统在接受体外循环心脏手术的先天性心脏病患儿中的急性肾损伤(AKI)的发生率及其对死亡率和发病率的影响。
本研究纳入了 2020 年 9 月 1 日至 12 月 1 日期间在小儿心脏重症监护病房接受体外循环心脏手术后随访的 18 岁以下儿童。术后根据小儿改良风险、损伤、衰竭、丧失和终末期(pRIFLE)、急性肾损伤网络(AKIN)和肾脏病:改善全球结局(KDIGO)标准对 AKI 进行分类。通过三种模型类别比较医院死亡率(术后 30 天内发生)和发病率(重症监护病房住院时间超过 7 天)。对结果进行统计学评估。
研究纳入了 100 例患者。中位年龄为 3 个月(1 天-180 个月)。根据 pRIFLE 分类,49%的病例诊断为急性肾损伤。AKIN 分类中 31%的患者诊断为急性肾损伤。KDIGO 标准中 41%的患者诊断为急性肾损伤。所有病例中有 25%(n=25)出现发病率。pRIFLE、AKIN 和 KDIGO 的 ROC 分析预测发病率的能力分别为 0.800、0.747 和 0.853。所有三个类别均显著预测发病率(P<0.001)。所有组的死亡率均为 10%(n=10)。pRIFLE、AKIN 和 KDIGO 的 ROC 分析预测死亡率的能力分别为 0.783、0.717 和 0.794,所有三个类别均显著预测死亡率(P<0.001)。
无论使用三种方法中的哪一种,接受先天性心脏病手术的儿科患者中 AKI 均较为常见。pRIFLE 分类比 AKIN 和 KDIGO 诊断出更多 AKI 患者。KDIGO 和 pRIFLE 分类在预测医院死亡率方面更好。