Scottish Centre for Respiratory Research, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, University of Dundee, Dundee, Scotland, DD1 9SY, UK.
Lung. 2022 Dec;200(6):691-696. doi: 10.1007/s00408-022-00579-2. Epub 2022 Oct 14.
The small airways dysfunction (SAD) asthma phenotype is characterised by narrowing of airways < 2 mm in diameter between generations 8 and 23 of the bronchial tree. Recently, this has become particularly relevant as measurements of small airways using airway oscillometry for example, are strong determinants of asthma control and exacerbations in moderate-to-severe asthma. The small airways can be assessed using spirometry as forced expiratory flow rate between 25 and 75% of forced vital capacity (FEF) and has been deemed more accurate in detecting small airways dysfunction than forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV). Oscillometry as the heterogeneity in resistance between 5 and 20 Hz (R5-R20), low frequency reactance at 5 Hz (X5) or area under the reactance curve between 5 Hz and the resonant frequency can also be used to assess the small airways. The small airways can also be assessed using the multiple breath nitrogen washout (MBNW) test giving rise to values including functional residual capacity, lung clearance index and ventilation distribution heterogeneity in the conducting (Scond) and the acinar (Sacin) airways. The ATLANTIS group showed that the prevalence of small airways disease in asthma defined on FEF, oscillometry and MBNW all increased with progressive GINA asthma disease stages. As opposed to topical inhaler therapy that might not adequately penetrate the small airways, it is perhaps more intuitive that systemic anti-inflammatory therapy with biologics targeting downstream cytokines and upstream epithelial anti-alarmins may offer a promising solution to SAD. Here we therefore aim to appraise the available evidence for the effect of anti-IgE, anti-IL5 (Rα), anti-IL4Rα, anti-TSLP and anti-IL33 biologics on small airways disease in patients with severe asthma.
小气道功能障碍 (SAD) 哮喘表型的特征是支气管树第 8 代和第 23 代之间直径<2mm 的气道变窄。最近,这一点变得尤为重要,因为使用气道振荡测量等方法测量小气道,是中重度哮喘控制和加重的重要决定因素。小气道可以通过肺活量测定法进行评估,例如用力呼气流量在用力肺活量的 25%至 75%之间(FEF),并且比 1 秒用力呼气量 (FEV) 更能准确检测小气道功能障碍。振荡测量法作为 5 至 20Hz 之间阻力的异质性(R5-R20)、5Hz 时低频电抗(X5)或电抗曲线在 5Hz 和共振频率之间的面积也可用于评估小气道。还可以使用多次呼吸氮冲洗(MBNW)测试评估小气道,得出的数值包括功能残气量、肺清除指数和传导气道(Scond)和腺泡气道(Sacin)的通气分布异质性。ATLANTIS 小组表明,根据 FEF、振荡测量法和 MBNW 定义的哮喘中小气道疾病的患病率随着 GINA 哮喘疾病阶段的进展而增加。与可能无法充分渗透小气道的局部吸入器疗法相反,针对下游细胞因子和上游上皮抗警报素的全身性抗炎疗法可能为 SAD 提供有前途的解决方案,这也许更直观。因此,我们旨在评估抗 IgE、抗 IL5 (Rα)、抗 IL4Rα、抗 TSLP 和抗 IL33 生物制剂对重度哮喘患者小气道疾病的疗效的现有证据。