Suppr超能文献

14 至 16 周行扩张和刮宫术前行当日与隔夜宫颈准备的急性并发症比较。

Acute complications with same-day versus overnight cervical preparation before dilation and evacuation at 14 to 16 weeks.

机构信息

Southern California Permanente Medical Group, San Diego, CA, USA.

Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Contraception. 2023 Jan;117:61-66. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2022.09.126. Epub 2022 Oct 12.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate if same-day cervical preparation is associated with a clinically acceptable complication rate compared with overnight osmotic dilators for dilation and evacuation (D&E).

STUDY DESIGN

This retrospective, noninferiority, cohort study compared complication rates for same-day versus overnight cervical preparation with D&E between 14 and 16 weeks gestation. Cervical preparation was achieved with misoprostol, osmotic dilators, or both. Our primary outcome was the acute complication rate, defined as: hemorrhage (≥500 mL); hospitalization or hospital transfer; transfusion; or unplanned procedure occurring within 24 hours of the index procedure. Secondarily we evaluated nonmajor (re-aspiration, suture repair of cervical laceration, uterine tamponade, or emergency department only transfer) and major (transfusion, uterine artery embolization, abdominal surgery, or hospital admission) complications separately. Inverse probability of treatment weighting using the propensity score was used to perform an adjusted analysis, taking into account age, ethnicity, clinic location, insurance, gestational age, gravidity, and prior pregnancy outcomes.

RESULTS

We analyzed 1,319 subjects (n = 864 same-day, n = 455 overnight). Same-day cervical preparation patients were more likely to have Medicaid and a prior vaginal delivery. In both unadjusted and adjusted analyses, acute complication rates for same-day were noninferior to overnight preparation (unadjusted 0.93% vs 1.98%, difference of -1.05%, CI: -2.48% to 0.38%; adjusted difference -0.50%, CI: -1.45 to 0.44%). Only one major complication in the same-day group, a cervical laceration resulting in hemorrhage requiring transfusion, occurred in the entire sample.

CONCLUSIONS

In this retrospective review, same-day cervical preparation was noninferior to overnight preparation for D&E between 14 and 16 weeks gestation, both with low complication rates.

IMPLICATIONS

For early second trimester dilation and evacuation, same-day cervical preparation should be considered a safe alternative to overnight cervical preparation.

摘要

目的

评估与隔夜渗透扩张器相比,同日行宫颈准备术是否与可接受的临床并发症发生率相关,用于扩张和排空(D&E)。

研究设计

这是一项回顾性非劣效性队列研究,比较了 14-16 周妊娠时 D&E 中同日与隔夜行宫颈准备术的并发症发生率。宫颈准备采用米索前列醇、渗透扩张器或两者联合进行。主要结局为急性并发症发生率,定义为:出血(≥500ml);住院或转院;输血;或在指数手术后 24 小时内计划外手术。其次,我们分别评估了非主要(再抽吸、宫颈裂伤缝合修复、子宫填塞或仅急诊科转院)和主要(输血、子宫动脉栓塞、腹部手术或住院治疗)并发症。采用倾向评分的逆概率治疗加权法进行调整分析,考虑年龄、种族、诊所位置、保险、孕龄、孕次和既往妊娠结局。

结果

我们分析了 1319 名患者(n=864 名同日,n=455 名隔夜)。同日行宫颈准备术的患者更可能有医疗补助和既往阴道分娩。在未调整和调整分析中,同日行宫颈准备术的急性并发症发生率均不劣于隔夜准备术(未调整的 0.93%比 1.98%,差异为-1.05%,CI:-2.48%至 0.38%;调整后的差异为-0.50%,CI:-1.45%至 0.44%)。仅在同一组中发生了 1 例主要并发症,即宫颈裂伤导致出血需要输血。

结论

在这项回顾性研究中,14-16 周妊娠时 D&E 中同日行宫颈准备术与隔夜准备术相比非劣效,且并发症发生率均较低。

意义

对于早期中期扩张和排空,同日行宫颈准备术应被视为隔夜宫颈准备术的安全替代方案。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验