Division of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Atlas University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Division of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Bezmialem Vakif University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2022 Dec;279:40-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.10.001. Epub 2022 Oct 5.
The main objective was to assess the relationship between inter-recti distance (IRD) and abdominal muscle endurance, pelvic floor functions, respiratory muscle strength, and postural control in women with Diastasis Recti Abdominis (DRA). Additionally, the secondary purpose of the study is to investigate the independent predictors of IRD in women with DRA.
Fifty-one women who were diagnosed with DRA participated to the study. IRD assessment with a caliper, abdominal muscle endurance test, Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory Questionnaire-20 (PFDI-20), maximum inspiratory and expiratory pressure (MIP and MEP, respectively) tests, Clinical Test of Sensory Integration of Balance (m-CTSIB) under eyes open on a firm surface (EOFS), eyes closed on a firm surface (ECFS), eyes open on a foam surface (EOFoS), and eyes closed on a foam surface (ECFoS) conditions, and Limits of Stability (LOS) tests were performed for all subjects. Pearson or Spearman correlation analyses were used to determine the relationship between IRD and static abdominal flexion endurance test, PFDI-20, MIP and MEP, m-CTSIB, and LOS scores depending on the distribution properties of the data. Additionally, linear regression analysis was utilized for analyzing the independent predictors of IRD among the age, BMI, parity, time since last birth, birth weight, weight gains last pregnancy, and mode of delivery.
IRD had correlations with Colorectal-Anal Distress score of PFDI-20 (r = -0.317, p = 0.03) and EOFS, ECFS, EOFoS, ECFoS and composite score of m-CTSIB (r = 0.356, p = 0.01; r = 0.337, p = 0.02, r = 0.279, p = 0.04; r = 0.265, p = 0.04; r = 0.413, p = 0.004, respectively) and LOS scores (r = 0.422, p = 0.003). Increased IRD did not influence abdominal muscle endurance and respiratory muscle strength in women with DRA (p < 0.05). Age, BMI, time since last birth, weight gains last pregnancy, and mode of delivery were not determined as the factors that influence IRD in women with DRA (p < 0.05).
We concluded that increased IRD is associated with worse postural control, but better colorectal functions in women with DRA. Additionally, IRD does not show a clear association with abdominal muscle endurance, pelvic floor functions, and respiratory muscle strength. According to our results, postural stability assessments may perform in the physiotherapeutic management of women with DRA.
本研究的主要目的是评估腹直肌分离(DRA)女性的腹内距(IRD)与腹部肌肉耐力、盆底功能、呼吸肌力量和姿势控制之间的关系。此外,本研究的次要目的是探讨 DRA 女性 IRD 的独立预测因子。
51 名被诊断为 DRA 的女性参与了本研究。使用卡尺评估 IRD,进行腹部肌肉耐力测试、盆底窘迫问卷-20 (PFDI-20)、最大吸气和呼气压力(MIP 和 MEP)测试、临床感觉整合平衡测试(m-CTSIB)睁眼在坚固表面(EOFS)、闭眼在坚固表面(ECFS)、睁眼在泡沫表面(EOFoS)和闭眼在泡沫表面(ECFoS)条件下,以及稳定性极限(LOS)测试。根据数据的分布特性,使用 Pearson 或 Spearman 相关分析来确定 IRD 与静态腹部屈伸耐力测试、PFDI-20、MIP 和 MEP、m-CTSIB 和 LOS 评分之间的关系。此外,线性回归分析用于分析年龄、BMI、产次、上次分娩后时间、出生体重、上次妊娠体重增加和分娩方式对 IRD 的独立预测因子。
IRD 与 PFDI-20 的直肠-肛门窘迫评分(r = -0.317,p = 0.03)和 EOFS、ECFS、EOFoS、ECFoS 和 m-CTSIB 综合评分(r = 0.356,p = 0.01;r = 0.337,p = 0.02,r = 0.279,p = 0.04;r = 0.265,p = 0.04;r = 0.413,p = 0.004)和 LOS 评分(r = 0.422,p = 0.003)相关。IRD 的增加并没有影响 DRA 女性的腹部肌肉耐力和呼吸肌力量(p < 0.05)。年龄、BMI、上次分娩后时间、上次妊娠体重增加和分娩方式并不是影响 DRA 女性 IRD 的因素(p < 0.05)。
我们得出结论,IRD 的增加与 DRA 女性的姿势控制较差但结直肠功能较好有关。此外,IRD 与腹部肌肉耐力、盆底功能和呼吸肌力量之间没有明显的关联。根据我们的结果,姿势稳定性评估可能在 DRA 女性的物理治疗管理中进行。