Institute of Environmental Processes and Pollution Control, and School of Environmental and Civil Engineering, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, 214122, China; CAS Key Laboratory of Soil Environment and Pollution Remediation, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing, 210008, China; Department of Renewable Resources, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2E3, Canada; University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China.
CAS Key Laboratory of Soil Environment and Pollution Remediation, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing, 210008, China; University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China.
Environ Pollut. 2022 Dec 15;315:120433. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2022.120433. Epub 2022 Oct 13.
Emerging microplastic pollution and biochar application result in their coexistence in the soil. In this study, a polyethylene microplastic, a straw biochar, and a manure biochar were applied alone or in combination to an agricultural soil to explore their interactive effects on microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen, bacterial community composition, structure and function, and the resultant greenhouse gas emissions in a 45-day laboratory incubation. At the end of incubation, the co-application of microplastic and biochar suppressed the global warming potential of cumulative greenhouse gas emissions compared with the sum of their application alone. Specifically, coexisting with microplastics increased NO emissions by 37.5% but decreased CH emissions by 35.8% in the straw biochar added soil, and decreased NO, CO and CH emissions by 24.8, 6.2, and 65.2%, respectively, in the manure biochar added soil. A correlation network analysis illustrated that the increased global warming potential was related to the changed bacterial function and microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen in the treatments with straw biochar and/or polyethylene microplastic added, and by the changed bacterial community structure and function in the treatments with manure biochar and/or polyethylene microplastic added. Bacterial functions associated with tricarboxylic acid cycle contributed to CO emissions. Bacterial functions associated with the nitrogen cycle such as nosZ and AOBamoABC were negatively and positively correlated with NO emissions, respectively. The interaction between different types of microplastics and soil amendments and the resultant effects on ecosystem function deserve further research.
新兴的微塑料污染和生物炭的应用导致它们在土壤中共存。本研究采用单一或组合的聚乙烯微塑料、秸秆生物炭和粪肥生物炭应用于农业土壤,以探索它们对微生物生物量碳和氮、细菌群落组成、结构和功能以及 45 天实验室培养过程中温室气体排放的交互影响。培养结束时,与生物炭共存的微塑料抑制了与单独应用相比,累计温室气体排放的全球变暖潜势。具体而言,在添加秸秆生物炭的土壤中,微塑料共存增加了 37.5%的 NO 排放,但降低了 35.8%的 CH 排放;在添加粪肥生物炭的土壤中,NO、CO 和 CH 排放分别降低了 24.8%、6.2%和 65.2%。相关网络分析表明,与添加秸秆生物炭和/或聚乙烯微塑料的处理中微生物生物量碳和氮以及添加粪肥生物炭和/或聚乙烯微塑料的处理中细菌群落结构和功能变化有关的微生物功能与增加的全球变暖潜势有关。与三羧酸循环相关的细菌功能与 CO 排放有关。与氮循环相关的细菌功能,如 nosZ 和 AOBamoABC,与 NO 排放呈负相关和正相关。不同类型的微塑料和土壤改良剂之间的相互作用及其对生态系统功能的影响值得进一步研究。