University College London, UK.
University College London, UK.
Ageing Res Rev. 2022 Dec;82:101758. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2022.101758. Epub 2022 Oct 13.
Dementia is a progressive neurodegenerative syndrome that has no cure. Although a significant proportion of people with dementia progress into the severe stages of the disease, evidence on the clinical effectiveness of treatments for people with severe dementia remains limited.
To systematically review the effectiveness of pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments for people living with severe dementia and assess the quality of the evidence.
We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL and online clinical trial registers up to January 2022, for Randomised Controlled Trials (RCT) in people living with severe dementia. Quality and risk of bias were assessed independently by two authors.
A total of 30 trials met our inclusion criteria of which 14 evaluated the effectiveness of pharmacological treatments, and 16 evaluated a non-pharmacological intervention. Pharmacological treatments: Meta-analyses indicated that pharmacological treatments (donepezil: 10 mg, 5 mg; galantamine: 24 mg; memantine: 10 mg) are associated with better outcomes compared to placebo for: severity of symptoms (standardized mean difference (SMD) 0.37, 95% CI 0.26-0.48; 4 studies; moderate-certainty evidence), activities of daily living (SMD 0.15, 95% CI 0.04-0.26; 5 studies; moderate-certainty evidence), and clinical impression of change (Relative Risk (RR) 1.34, 95% CI 1.14-1.57; 4 studies; low-certainty evidence). Pharmacological treatments were also more likely to reduce mortality compared to placebo (RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.40-0.89; 6 studies; low-certainty evidence). Non-pharmacological treatments: Five trials were included in the meta-analyses of non-pharmacological interventions (multi-sensory stimulation, needs assessment, and activities-based interventions); results showed that non-pharmacological interventions may reduce neuropsychiatric symptoms of dementia compared to usual care (SMD -0.33, 95% CI -0.59 to -0.06; low certainty evidence).
There is moderate-certainty evidence that pharmacological treatments may decrease disease severity and improve function for people with severe dementia. Non-pharmacological treatments are probably effective in reducing neuropsychiatric symptoms but the quality of evidence remains low. There is an urgent need for high-quality evidence for other outcomes and for developing service-user informed interventions for this under-served group.
痴呆是一种进行性神经退行性综合征,目前尚无治愈方法。尽管相当一部分痴呆患者会进展为疾病的严重阶段,但关于严重痴呆患者治疗的临床效果的证据仍然有限。
系统评价治疗严重痴呆患者的药物和非药物治疗的有效性,并评估证据质量。
我们检索了 MEDLINE、EMBASE、PsycINFO、CINAHL 和在线临床试验注册处,截至 2022 年 1 月,以寻找患有严重痴呆症的人的随机对照试验 (RCT)。两位作者独立评估质量和偏倚风险。
共有 30 项试验符合纳入标准,其中 14 项评估了药物治疗的有效性,16 项评估了非药物干预措施。药物治疗:Meta 分析表明,与安慰剂相比,药物治疗(多奈哌齐:10mg、5mg;加兰他敏:24mg;美金刚:10mg)在以下方面具有更好的疗效:症状严重程度(标准化均数差 (SMD) 0.37,95%CI 0.26-0.48;4 项研究;中等确定性证据)、日常生活活动(SMD 0.15,95%CI 0.04-0.26;5 项研究;中等确定性证据)和临床印象变化(相对风险 (RR) 1.34,95%CI 1.14-1.57;4 项研究;低确定性证据)。与安慰剂相比,药物治疗也更有可能降低死亡率(RR 0.60,95%CI 0.40-0.89;6 项研究;低确定性证据)。非药物治疗:五项试验被纳入非药物干预措施的 meta 分析(多感官刺激、需求评估和基于活动的干预措施);结果表明,与常规护理相比,非药物干预措施可能会减少痴呆的神经精神症状(SMD-0.33,95%CI-0.59 至-0.06;低确定性证据)。
有中等确定性证据表明,药物治疗可能会降低严重痴呆患者的疾病严重程度并改善其功能。非药物治疗可能在减轻神经精神症状方面有效,但证据质量仍然较低。迫切需要针对这一服务不足人群的其他结局和以服务使用者为中心的干预措施提供高质量证据。