Department of Orthodontics, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Department of Orthodontics, Dental Research Center, Dentistry Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Int Orthod. 2022 Dec;20(4):100693. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2022.100693. Epub 2022 Oct 12.
Shear bond strength and microleakage are the success factors of fixed retainers. Recently, primer-free composites were introduced to reduce chair time. The main objectives of this study were to compare the shear bond strength (SBS) and microleakage of GC Ortho Connect Flow (OF) and Transbond XT (TXT) with two types of common retainer wires (0.0175-inch twisted wire and 0.028×.0.008-inch ribbon dead soft wire retainers). The secondary objectives of the study were to compare enamel-adhesive interface and wire-adhesive interface microleakages.
This in vitro study was conducted on 132 human mandibular incisors (96 for bond strength and 36 for microleakage). The teeth were randomly divided into four groups for use of ribbon and twisted wires with OF and TXT adhesives. The bond strength was measured by a universal testing machine. Microleakage was evaluated by the dye penetration test using 0.05% fuchsine. Data were analysed by two-way ANOVA (alpha=0.05).
No significant difference was noted in bond strength among the four groups (P>0.05). However, the microleakage of OF was significantly higher than that of TXT at both the enamel-adhesive and wire-adhesive interfaces (P<0.001). The microleakage at the wire-adhesive and enamel-adhesive interface was not significantly different in groups 1 and 4 and was significant in group 2 and 3.
Type of adhesive significantly affected the microleakage, and OF resulted in higher microleakage than TXT at both the enamel-adhesive and wire-adhesive interfaces. Type of wire had no significant effect on microleakage. Although OF showed comparable SBS to TXT, its higher microleakage may compromise its successful long-term clinical service.
固位体的成功因素包括剪切粘结强度和微渗漏。最近,推出了无底漆复合材料以减少椅旁时间。本研究的主要目的是比较 GC Ortho Connect Flow(OF)和 Transbond XT(TXT)与两种常见的固位体钢丝(0.0175 英寸扭线和 0.028×0.008 英寸扁丝死软丝固位体)的剪切粘结强度(SBS)和微渗漏。本研究的次要目的是比较釉质-粘结剂界面和钢丝-粘结剂界面的微渗漏。
本体外研究共纳入 132 个人类下颌切牙(96 个用于粘结强度测试,36 个用于微渗漏测试)。牙齿随机分为四组,分别使用 OF 和 TXT 粘结剂的扁丝和扭线。使用万能试验机测量粘结强度。使用 0.05%碱性品红进行染料渗透试验评估微渗漏。采用双因素方差分析(α=0.05)对数据进行分析。
四组间粘结强度无显著性差异(P>0.05)。然而,OF 在釉质-粘结剂和钢丝-粘结剂界面的微渗漏均显著高于 TXT(P<0.001)。在第 1 组和第 4 组,钢丝-粘结剂和釉质-粘结剂界面的微渗漏无显著性差异,而在第 2 组和第 3 组则有显著性差异。
粘结剂类型显著影响微渗漏,OF 在釉质-粘结剂和钢丝-粘结剂界面的微渗漏均高于 TXT。钢丝类型对微渗漏无显著影响。尽管 OF 的 SBS 与 TXT 相当,但较高的微渗漏可能会影响其长期临床应用。