Health Campus The Hague, Leiden University Medical Center, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
BMC Public Health. 2022 Oct 15;22(1):1925. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14312-4.
The Netherlands hosts, as many other European countries, three population-based cancer screening programmes (CSPs). The overall uptake among these CSPs is high, but has decreased over recent years. Especially in highly urbanized regions the uptake rates tend to fall below the minimal effective rate of 70% set by the World Health Organization. Understanding the reasons underlying the decision of citizens to partake in a CPS are essential in order to optimize the current screening participation rates. The aim of this study was to explore the various perspectives concerning cancer screening among inhabitants of The Hague, a highly urbanized region of the Netherlands.
A Q-methodology study was conducted to provide insight in the prevailing perspectives on partaking in CSPs. All respondents were inhabitants of the city of The Hague, the Netherlands. In an online application they ranked a set of 31 statements, based on the current available literature and clustered by the Integrated Change model, into a 9-column forced ranking grid according to level of agreement, followed by a short survey. Respondents were asked to participate in a subsequent interview to explain their ranking. By-person factor analysis was used to identify distinct perspectives, which were interpreted using data from the rankings and interviews.
Three distinct perspectives were identified: 1). "Positive about participation", 2). "Thoughtful about participation", and 3). "Fear drives participation". These perspectives provide insight into how potential respondents, living in an urbanized region in the Netherlands, decide upon partaking in CSPs.
Since CSPs will only be effective when participation rates are sufficiently high, it is essential to have insight into the different perspectives among potential respondents concerning partaking in a CSP. This study adds new insights concerning these perspectives and suggests several ideas for future optimization of the CSPs.
荷兰与许多其他欧洲国家一样,拥有三个基于人群的癌症筛查计划(CSP)。这些 CSP 的总体参与率很高,但近年来有所下降。特别是在高度城市化的地区,参与率往往低于世界卫生组织设定的 70%的最低有效率。了解公民决定参加 CPS 的背后原因对于优化当前的筛查参与率至关重要。本研究旨在探讨荷兰海牙市居民对癌症筛查的各种看法,海牙市是荷兰高度城市化的地区。
采用 Q 方法学研究来深入了解参与 CSP 的各种观点。所有受访者均为荷兰海牙市的居民。他们在一个在线应用程序中,根据当前可用的文献并按照综合变革模型进行分组,根据同意程度将 31 个陈述排列在一个 9 列强制排序网格中,然后进行简短的调查。要求受访者参加后续访谈以解释他们的排名。逐人因素分析用于识别不同的观点,并使用排名和访谈中的数据进行解释。
确定了三个不同的观点:1)“积极参与”,2)“慎重参与”和 3)“恐惧驱动参与”。这些观点深入了解了生活在荷兰城市化地区的潜在受访者如何决定参加 CSP。
由于只有当参与率足够高时,CSP 才会有效,因此必须深入了解潜在受访者对参加 CSP 的不同看法。本研究为这些观点提供了新的见解,并为未来优化 CSP 提出了一些想法。