Suppr超能文献

俯卧位机器人辅助微创食管切除术能量设备的特点与应用:一项叙述性综述

Features and applications of energy devices for prone robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: a narrative review.

作者信息

Hirahara Noriyuki, Matsubara Takeshi, Hayashi Hikota, Tajima Yoshitsugu

机构信息

Department of Digestive and General Surgery, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Izumo, Japan.

出版信息

J Thorac Dis. 2022 Sep;14(9):3606-3612. doi: 10.21037/jtd-22-559.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Robot-assisted surgery is particularly useful in esophagectomy for esophageal cancer because robotic systems have high-resolution three-dimensional imaging, tremor filtering, and articulated instruments. This review article focuses on the applications and limitations of surgical devices in robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE).

METHODS

A narrative search of Medline was performed for articles published using the keywords "robot-assisted esophagectomy", "technique", "postoperative complication", and "short-term outcomes".

KEY CONTENTS AND FINDINGS

Monopolar scissors: these devices with a sharp tip have an articulating function that allows for fast, sharp dissection without an electrical source. However, scissor-type devices cannot compress the organ, and their hemostatic ability is rather weak. Maryland bipolar forceps: the device has a very thin tip that allows for accurate dissection as well as stronger hemostatic ability by closing the forceps to compress tissues and applying electric current. The disadvantage is longer operation time because the forceps need to be constantly closed and reopened. Long Maryland bipolar grasper: the tip of the long Maryland bipolar grasper is slightly blunt and has the advantage of versatility because it can grip the tissue more delicately. Ultrasonic scalpel: the device can transect tissues speedily without bleeding, shortening operation time, but lacks articulating function. Although thermal spread to the surroundings is relatively narrow, activation time increases with the amount of tissue to be grasped; this raises the temperature above that of the vessel sealer. Vessel sealer: the device is one of the most powerful hemostatic energy devices, based on bipolar electrodes. The articulating jaws on both sides are more suited for sharp transection rather than meticulous dissection because of its powerful hemostatic force and blunt tip. It is also important to note that the vessel sealer produces widespread high-temperature steam. SynchroSeal: the device offers fast activation time, and due to the tip of the device being finely divided, which requires relatively precise manipulation.

CONCLUSIONS

Robot-assisted surgery reduces the limitations of conventional endoscopic surgery by offering stable high-resolution three-dimensional imaging, tremor filtering, and articulated instruments. It is important to understand and exploit the advantages of energy devices suitable for RAMIE.

摘要

背景与目的

机器人辅助手术在食管癌食管切除术中特别有用,因为机器人系统具有高分辨率三维成像、震颤过滤和关节式器械。这篇综述文章重点关注手术器械在机器人辅助微创食管切除术(RAMIE)中的应用及局限性。

方法

对Medline进行叙述性检索,查找使用关键词“机器人辅助食管切除术”“技术”“术后并发症”和“短期结局”发表的文章。

关键内容与发现

单极剪刀:这些尖端锋利的器械具有关节运动功能,无需电源即可快速、精准地进行解剖。然而,剪刀式器械无法压迫器官,其止血能力较弱。马里兰双极钳:该器械尖端非常细,通过闭合钳子压迫组织并施加电流,既能进行精确解剖,又具有更强的止血能力。缺点是操作时间较长,因为钳子需要不断闭合和打开。长马里兰双极抓钳:长马里兰双极抓钳的尖端稍钝,具有多功能性优势,因为它能更精细地抓取组织。超声刀:该器械能快速横断组织且不出血,缩短手术时间,但缺乏关节运动功能。尽管热扩散到周围组织的范围相对较窄,但激活时间会随着抓取组织量的增加而延长;这会使温度升高到高于血管闭合器的温度。血管闭合器:该器械是基于双极电极的最强大的止血能量器械之一。由于其强大的止血力和钝头,两侧的关节钳更适合锐利横断而非精细解剖。还需注意的是,血管闭合器会产生广泛的高温蒸汽。同步闭合器:该器械激活时间快,且由于器械尖端精细分割,需要相对精确的操作。

结论

机器人辅助手术通过提供稳定的高分辨率三维成像、震颤过滤和关节式器械,减少了传统内镜手术的局限性。了解并利用适合RAMIE的能量器械的优势很重要。

相似文献

2
Robot assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) for esophageal cancer.
Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2018 Oct-Dec;36-37:81-83. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2018.11.004. Epub 2018 Nov 29.
4
Initial Experience of Robot-Assisted Adrenalectomy in Japan: What is the Optimal Selection of Robotic Forceps for Adrenalectomy?
Yonago Acta Med. 2022 May 23;65(2):176-180. doi: 10.33160/yam.2022.05.008. eCollection 2022 May.
5
Current status of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: what is the real benefit?
Surg Today. 2022 Sep;52(9):1246-1253. doi: 10.1007/s00595-021-02432-0. Epub 2021 Dec 1.
7
Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: A systematic review.
J Surg Oncol. 2015 Sep;112(3):257-65. doi: 10.1002/jso.23922.

引用本文的文献

1
Deep pelvis and low visceral fat mass as risk factors for neurogenic bladder after rectal cancer surgery.
BMC Gastroenterol. 2024 Sep 27;24(1):323. doi: 10.1186/s12876-024-03433-2.
2
Robotic liver parenchymal transection using the SynchroSeal.
Surg Endosc. 2024 Sep;38(9):4947-4955. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11005-4. Epub 2024 Jul 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Transition from da Vinci to Versius robotic surgical system: initial experience and outcomes of over 100 consecutive procedures.
J Robot Surg. 2023 Apr;17(2):419-426. doi: 10.1007/s11701-022-01422-9. Epub 2022 Jun 26.
2
Initial Experience of Robot-Assisted Adrenalectomy in Japan: What is the Optimal Selection of Robotic Forceps for Adrenalectomy?
Yonago Acta Med. 2022 May 23;65(2):176-180. doi: 10.33160/yam.2022.05.008. eCollection 2022 May.
7
Robotic Vessel Sealer Device for Lymphocele Prevention After Pelvic Lymphadenectomy: Results of a Randomized Trial.
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2022 Jul;32(7):721-726. doi: 10.1089/lap.2021.0531. Epub 2021 Oct 22.
8
Challenges in improving the minimal invasiveness of the surgical treatment for gastric cancer using robotic technology.
Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2021 May 4;5(5):604-613. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12463. eCollection 2021 Sep.
10
Repeated partial tissue bite with inadequate cooling time for an energy device may cause thermal injury.
Surg Endosc. 2021 Jun;35(6):3189-3198. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08322-3. Epub 2021 Feb 1.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验