Frustaci Anna Maria, Del Poeta Giovanni, Visentin Andrea, Sportoletti Paolo, Fresa Alberto, Vitale Candida, Murru Roberta, Chiarenza Annalisa, Sanna Alessandro, Mauro Francesca Romana, Reda Gianluigi, Gentile Massimo, Varettoni Marzia, Baratè Claudia, Borella Chiara, Greco Antonino, Deodato Marina, Zamprogna Giulia, Laureana Roberta, Cipiciani Alessandra, Galitzia Andrea, Curto Pelle Angelo, Morelli Francesca, Malvisi Lucio, Coscia Marta, Laurenti Luca, Trentin Livio, Montillo Marco, Cairoli Roberto, Tedeschi Alessandra
Department of Hematology, Niguarda Cancer Center, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Piazza Ospedale Maggiore 3, Milano 20162, Italy.
Hematology, Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University Tor Vergata, Roma, Italy.
Ther Adv Hematol. 2022 Oct 10;13:20406207221127550. doi: 10.1177/20406207221127550. eCollection 2022.
The question of which parameters may be informative on venetoclax outcome in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is still unclear. Furthermore, the choice to treat with venetoclax can be challenging in patients with baseline characteristics or comorbidities that may potentially favor some specific adverse events.
This study was aimed to evaluate whether age, fitness status, patients'/disease characteristics, or concomitant medications may predict outcomes in CLL patients receiving venetoclax.
Retrospective observational study.
Impact of age, presence of Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (CIRS) >6 or severe organ impairment (CIRS3+), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-Performance Status (ECOG-PS), renal function, and concomitant medications were retrospectively analyzed on treatment management (definitive discontinuation due to toxicity, discontinuation due to toxicity, Tox-DTD; permanent dose reduction, PDR) and survival [progression free survival (PFS), event free survival (EFS), overall survival (OS)] in unselected patients receiving venetoclax monotherapy in common practice.
A total of 221 relapsed/refractory patients were included. Tox-DTD and PDR were reported in 5.9% and 21.7%, respectively, and were not influenced by any fitness parameter, age, number or type of concomitant medication, baseline neutropenia, or impaired renal function. None of these factors were associated with tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) development. Age and coexisting conditions had no influence on PFS and EFS. At univariate analysis, OS was significantly shorter only in patients with ECOG-PS >1 ( < 0.0001) and elderly (⩾65 years) with CIRS >6 ( = 0.014) or CIRS3+ ( = 0.031). ECOG-PS >1 retained an independent role only for EFS and OS. While Tox-DTD affected all survival outcomes, no differences in PFS were reported among patients permanently reducing dose or interrupting venetoclax for > 7 days.
Clinical outcome with venetoclax is not influenced by comorbidities, patients' clinical characteristics, or concomitant medications. Differently from other targeted therapies, this demonstrates that, except ECOG-PS, none of the parameters generally considered for treatment choice, including baseline neutropenia or impaired renal function, should rule the decision process with this agent. Anyway, if clinically needed, a correct drug management does not compromise treatment efficacy and may avoid toxicity-driven discontinuations.
• The question of which parameters may be informative on venetoclax outcome in chronic lymphocytic leukemia is still unclear. Furthermore, the choice to treat with venetoclax can be challenging in patients with baseline characteristics or comorbidities that may potentially favor some specific adverse events (e.g. compromised renal function or baseline neutropenia).• In our large series of patients treated outside of clinical trials, we demonstrated that neither age, fitness, comorbidities nor concomitant medications impact on venetoclax management and survival. Importantly, patients presenting with baseline neutropenia or impaired renal function did not have a higher rate of dose reductions or toxicity-driven discontinuations, thus further underlining that venetoclax may be safely administered even in those categories with no preclusions.• Differently from other targeted agents, our data demonstrate that none of the baseline factors commonly considered in treatment decision process retains a role with venetoclax. Finally, permanent dose reductions and temporary interruptions did not adversely impact PFS suggesting that, if clinically needed, a correct drug management should be adopted with no risk of compromising venetoclax efficacy.
在慢性淋巴细胞白血病(CLL)中,哪些参数可能对维奈克拉的治疗结果具有参考价值仍不明确。此外,对于具有可能引发某些特定不良事件的基线特征或合并症的患者,选择使用维奈克拉进行治疗可能具有挑战性。
本研究旨在评估年龄、健康状况、患者/疾病特征或合并用药是否可预测接受维奈克拉治疗的CLL患者的预后。
回顾性观察研究。
回顾性分析年龄、累积疾病评定量表(CIRS)评分>6或存在严重器官功能损害(CIRS3+)、东部肿瘤协作组体能状态(ECOG-PS)、肾功能以及合并用药对常规接受维奈克拉单药治疗的未选择患者的治疗管理(因毒性导致的最终停药、因毒性停药,即Tox-DTD;永久剂量减少,即PDR)和生存情况[无进展生存期(PFS)、无事件生存期(EFS)、总生存期(OS)]的影响。
共纳入221例复发/难治性患者。Tox-DTD和PDR的发生率分别为5.9%和21.7%,且不受任何健康参数、年龄、合并用药的数量或类型、基线中性粒细胞减少或肾功能损害的影响。这些因素均与肿瘤溶解综合征(TLS)的发生无关。年龄和并存疾病对PFS和EFS无影响。单因素分析显示,仅ECOG-PS>1(<0.0001)以及年龄≥65岁且CIRS>6(=0.014)或CIRS3+(=0.031)的患者OS显著缩短。ECOG-PS>1仅对EFS和OS具有独立影响。虽然Tox-DTD影响所有生存结局,但在永久降低剂量或中断维奈克拉治疗>7天的患者中,PFS未报告差异。
维奈克拉的临床疗效不受合并症、患者临床特征或合并用药的影响。与其他靶向治疗不同,这表明除ECOG-PS外,通常在治疗选择时考虑的参数,包括基线中性粒细胞减少或肾功能损害,均不应作为使用该药物决策过程的依据。无论如何,如果临床需要,正确的药物管理不会影响治疗效果,且可避免因毒性导致的停药。
• 关于哪些参数可能对慢性淋巴细胞白血病中维奈克拉的治疗结果具有参考价值的问题仍不明确。此外,对于具有可能引发某些特定不良事件(如肾功能受损或基线中性粒细胞减少)的基线特征或合并症的患者,选择使用维奈克拉进行治疗可能具有挑战性。
• 在我们大量非临床试验治疗的患者中,我们证明年龄、健康状况、合并症及合并用药均不影响维奈克拉的治疗管理和生存情况。重要的是,存在基线中性粒细胞减少或肾功能损害的患者并未有更高的剂量减少率或因毒性导致的停药率,这进一步表明即使在这些无禁忌的患者类别中,维奈克拉也可安全使用。
• 与其他靶向药物不同,我们的数据表明在治疗决策过程中通常考虑的基线因素在维奈克拉治疗中均无影响。最后,永久剂量减少和临时中断治疗对PFS无不利影响,这表明如果临床需要,应采用正确的药物管理,而不会有影响维奈克拉疗效的风险。