From Stanford University, Stanford (T.D.S., S.E.C.), the University of California, Irvine, Medical Center, Orange (S.O.), and Kaiser Permanente National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP)-Permanente Medical Group, Oakland (C.C.Z.) - all in California; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston (X.V.W., R.M.S.); Mayo Clinic, Rochester (N.E.K., C.A.H., J.F.L., M.L.), and Minnesota Oncology, Burnsville (A.K.S.) - both in Minnesota; Northwell Health Cancer Institute, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra-Northwell, Lake Success (J.B.), and University of Rochester, Rochester (P.M.B.) - both in New York; Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ (D.F.J., E.B.); Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis (A.F.C.); Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York (A.R.M., M.T.); Aurora Cancer Care, West Allis, WI (M.P.M.); National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (R.F.L.); and the University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa (H.E.).
N Engl J Med. 2019 Aug 1;381(5):432-443. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1817073.
Data regarding the efficacy of treatment with ibrutinib-rituximab, as compared with standard chemoimmunotherapy with fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab, in patients with previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) have been limited.
In a phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned (in a 2:1 ratio) patients 70 years of age or younger with previously untreated CLL to receive either ibrutinib and rituximab for six cycles (after a single cycle of ibrutinib alone), followed by ibrutinib until disease progression, or six cycles of chemoimmunotherapy with fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab. The primary end point was progression-free survival, and overall survival was a secondary end point. We report the results of a planned interim analysis.
A total of 529 patients underwent randomization (354 patients to the ibrutinib-rituximab group, and 175 to the chemoimmunotherapy group). At a median follow-up of 33.6 months, the results of the analysis of progression-free survival favored ibrutinib-rituximab over chemoimmunotherapy (89.4% vs. 72.9% at 3 years; hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.35; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.22 to 0.56; P<0.001), and the results met the protocol-defined efficacy threshold for the interim analysis. The results of the analysis of overall survival also favored ibrutinib-rituximab over chemoimmunotherapy (98.8% vs. 91.5% at 3 years; hazard ratio for death, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.05 to 0.54; P<0.001). In a subgroup analysis involving patients without immunoglobulin heavy-chain variable region () mutation, ibrutinib-rituximab resulted in better progression-free survival than chemoimmunotherapy (90.7% vs. 62.5% at 3 years; hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.14 to 0.50). The 3-year progression-free survival among patients with mutation was 87.7% in the ibrutinib-rituximab group and 88.0% in the chemoimmunotherapy group (hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.14 to 1.36). The incidence of adverse events of grade 3 or higher (regardless of attribution) was similar in the two groups (in 282 of 352 patients [80.1%] who received ibrutinib-rituximab and in 126 of 158 [79.7%] who received chemoimmunotherapy), whereas infectious complications of grade 3 or higher were less common with ibrutinib-rituximab than with chemoimmunotherapy (in 37 patients [10.5%] vs. 32 [20.3%], P<0.001).
The ibrutinib-rituximab regimen resulted in progression-free survival and overall survival that were superior to those with a standard chemoimmunotherapy regimen among patients 70 years of age or younger with previously untreated CLL. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute and Pharmacyclics; E1912 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02048813.).
此前,ibrutinib-利妥昔单抗与氟达拉滨、环磷酰胺和利妥昔单抗标准化疗免疫疗法相比,在未经治疗的慢性淋巴细胞白血病(CLL)患者中的疗效数据有限。
在一项 3 期试验中,我们将 70 岁及以下未经治疗的 CLL 患者随机分为两组(2:1 比例),一组接受利妥昔单抗联合伊布替尼治疗 6 个周期(伊布替尼单药治疗 1 个周期后),随后继续伊布替尼治疗直至疾病进展;另一组接受氟达拉滨、环磷酰胺和利妥昔单抗 6 个周期的化疗免疫治疗。主要终点是无进展生存期,次要终点是总生存期。我们报告了计划中的中期分析结果。
共有 529 名患者接受了随机分组(354 名患者接受伊布替尼联合利妥昔单抗治疗,175 名患者接受化疗免疫治疗)。中位随访 33.6 个月时,无进展生存期的分析结果表明伊布替尼联合利妥昔单抗优于化疗免疫治疗(3 年时分别为 89.4%和 72.9%;进展或死亡的风险比为 0.35;95%置信区间[CI]为 0.22 至 0.56;P<0.001),并且该结果达到了中期分析的协议定义的疗效阈值。总生存期的分析结果也表明伊布替尼联合利妥昔单抗优于化疗免疫治疗(3 年时分别为 98.8%和 91.5%;死亡风险比为 0.17;95%CI 为 0.05 至 0.54;P<0.001)。在涉及无免疫球蛋白重链可变区()突变患者的亚组分析中,伊布替尼联合利妥昔单抗治疗的无进展生存期优于化疗免疫治疗(3 年时分别为 90.7%和 62.5%;进展或死亡的风险比为 0.26;95%CI 为 0.14 至 0.50)。在 组患者中,伊布替尼联合利妥昔单抗组的 3 年无进展生存率为 87.7%,化疗免疫治疗组为 88.0%(进展或死亡的风险比为 0.44;95%CI 为 0.14 至 1.36)。两组发生 3 级或更高级别的不良事件(无论归因如何)的发生率相似(伊布替尼联合利妥昔单抗组 352 例患者中有 282 例[80.1%],化疗免疫治疗组 158 例患者中有 126 例[79.7%]),而 3 级或更高级别的感染并发症在伊布替尼联合利妥昔单抗组较少见(37 例[10.5%]与 32 例[20.3%]相比,P<0.001)。
在 70 岁及以下未经治疗的 CLL 患者中,伊布替尼联合利妥昔单抗方案与标准化疗免疫治疗方案相比,无进展生存期和总生存期均有改善。(由美国国立癌症研究所和 Pharmacyclics 资助;E1912 ClinicalTrials.gov 编号,NCT02048813。)