Alghamdi Nabeel Hamdan, Pohlig Ryan T, Megan Sions Jaclyn, Silbernagel Karin Grävare
Department of Physical Therapy, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Department of Physical Therapy, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA.
Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2022 Apr-Jun;12(2):115-121. doi: 10.32098/mltj.02.2022.04.
The purpose of this study was to determine structural and pathological differences of Achilles tendon insertion between insertional Achilles tendinopathy (IAT) and midportion Achilles tendinopathy (MidAT) in both injured and uninjured sides.
Patients (n=34; 58.8% male) with unilateral Achilles tendinopathy (50% with IAT; 50% with MidAT) were recruited. Median age 52 years and Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment - Achilles (VISA-A) score mean 59, and 17 (12 male) had MidAT, median(range) age of 58(48)years, and VISA-A score mean(SD) 59.1(19.7). Ultrasound imaging was used to evaluate structural measurements at the insertion (insertional length, bone-to-insertion length, and tendon insertion angle), tendon length (calcaneus to soleus), tendon thickness at the calcaneal edge, and the presence of pathological changes (boney deformity and/or calcification). A 2×2 mixed Analysis of Variance (group by side) was used to compare IAT and MidAT groups and injured and uninjured sides.
Tendon thickness at the calcaneus on the injured side was significantly greater than the uninjured side in the IAT group but not in the MidAT group (P=.001). VISA-A score was 59.9(18.7) in IAT group and 59.1(19.7) for MidAT group (P=.909). There were no significant group-by-side interactions for structural measurements at insertion site.
Calcaneal edge tendon thickness was the only significant structural difference observed between involved and uninvolved sides in IAT, although this was not found in in MidAT.
本研究旨在确定在受伤侧和未受伤侧,插入性跟腱病(IAT)与跟腱中部病变(MidAT)之间跟腱附着点的结构和病理差异。
招募了单侧跟腱病患者(n = 34;58.8%为男性)(50%为IAT;50%为MidAT)。中位年龄52岁,维多利亚运动评估机构 - 跟腱(VISA - A)评分平均为59分,其中17例(12例男性)患有MidAT,中位(范围)年龄为58(48)岁,VISA - A评分平均(标准差)为59.1(19.7)。采用超声成像评估附着点处的结构测量值(插入长度、骨 - 插入长度和肌腱插入角度)、肌腱长度(跟骨至比目鱼肌)、跟骨边缘处的肌腱厚度以及病理变化的存在情况(骨畸形和/或钙化)。采用2×2混合方差分析(组×侧)比较IAT组和MidAT组以及受伤侧和未受伤侧。
IAT组中,受伤侧跟骨处的肌腱厚度显著大于未受伤侧,而MidAT组则无此差异(P = 0.001)。IAT组的VISA - A评分为59.9(18.7),MidAT组为59.1(19.7)(P = 0.909)。在附着点处的结构测量中,未发现显著的组×侧交互作用。
跟骨边缘肌腱厚度是IAT中患侧与未患侧之间观察到的唯一显著结构差异,尽管在MidAT中未发现此差异。