Lobina David J, Demestre Josep, García-Albea José E, Guasch Marc
Psycholinguistics Research Group, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona, Spain.
Department of Psychology and Research Center for Behavior Assessment, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona, Spain.
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 28;13:962099. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.962099. eCollection 2022.
Combining two thoughts into a compound mental representation is a central feature of our verbal and non-verbal logical abilities. We here approach this issue by focusing on the contingency that while natural languages have typically lexicalised only two of the possible 16 binary connectives from formal logic to express compound thoughts-namely, the coordinators and -some of the remainder appear to be entertainable in a non-verbal, conceptual representational system-a -and this suggests a theoretical split between the "lexicalisation" of the connectives and the "learnability" of invented words corresponding to unlexicalised connectives. In a experiment aimed at tracking comprehension-related as well as reasoning-related aspects of the capacity to represent compound thoughts, we found that participants are capable of learning and interpreting a made-up word standing for logic's NAND operator, a result that indicates that unlexicalised logical connectives are not only conceptually available, but can also be mapped onto new function words, as in the case of coordinators, or connectives, a class of words that do not usually admit new coinages.
将两种思维组合成一个复合心理表征是我们语言和非语言逻辑能力的核心特征。我们在此探讨这个问题,重点关注这样一种情况:虽然自然语言通常只将形式逻辑中16种可能的二元连接词中的两种进行了词汇化,用以表达复合思维,即并列连词“和”,但其余一些连接词似乎在非语言的概念表征系统中是可以理解的,这表明在连接词的“词汇化”与对应未被词汇化连接词的新造词的“可学习性”之间存在理论上的分歧。在一项旨在追踪复合思维表征能力中与理解和推理相关方面的实验中,我们发现参与者能够学习和解释代表逻辑与非运算符的人造词,这一结果表明未被词汇化的逻辑连接词不仅在概念上是可用的,而且还可以像并列连词或连接词那样映射到新的功能词上,而连接词这类词通常不接纳新造词。