Suppr超能文献

未言明的思维:在没有语言逻辑连接词的情况下进行思考。

Unsaid thoughts: Thinking in the absence of verbal logical connectives.

作者信息

Lobina David J, Demestre Josep, García-Albea José E, Guasch Marc

机构信息

Psycholinguistics Research Group, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona, Spain.

Department of Psychology and Research Center for Behavior Assessment, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona, Spain.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 28;13:962099. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.962099. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

Combining two thoughts into a compound mental representation is a central feature of our verbal and non-verbal logical abilities. We here approach this issue by focusing on the contingency that while natural languages have typically lexicalised only two of the possible 16 binary connectives from formal logic to express compound thoughts-namely, the coordinators and -some of the remainder appear to be entertainable in a non-verbal, conceptual representational system-a -and this suggests a theoretical split between the "lexicalisation" of the connectives and the "learnability" of invented words corresponding to unlexicalised connectives. In a experiment aimed at tracking comprehension-related as well as reasoning-related aspects of the capacity to represent compound thoughts, we found that participants are capable of learning and interpreting a made-up word standing for logic's NAND operator, a result that indicates that unlexicalised logical connectives are not only conceptually available, but can also be mapped onto new function words, as in the case of coordinators, or connectives, a class of words that do not usually admit new coinages.

摘要

将两种思维组合成一个复合心理表征是我们语言和非语言逻辑能力的核心特征。我们在此探讨这个问题,重点关注这样一种情况:虽然自然语言通常只将形式逻辑中16种可能的二元连接词中的两种进行了词汇化,用以表达复合思维,即并列连词“和”,但其余一些连接词似乎在非语言的概念表征系统中是可以理解的,这表明在连接词的“词汇化”与对应未被词汇化连接词的新造词的“可学习性”之间存在理论上的分歧。在一项旨在追踪复合思维表征能力中与理解和推理相关方面的实验中,我们发现参与者能够学习和解释代表逻辑与非运算符的人造词,这一结果表明未被词汇化的逻辑连接词不仅在概念上是可用的,而且还可以像并列连词或连接词那样映射到新的功能词上,而连接词这类词通常不接纳新造词。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de7e/9554482/27bb13e6799d/fpsyg-13-962099-g0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Unsaid thoughts: Thinking in the absence of verbal logical connectives.
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 28;13:962099. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.962099. eCollection 2022.
2
Mental representation of logical connectives.
Q J Exp Psychol A. 2004 May;57(4):636-65. doi: 10.1080/02724980343000413.
3
Multiple neural representations of elementary logical connectives.
Neuroimage. 2016 Jul 15;135:300-10. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.04.061. Epub 2016 Apr 29.
5
Update rules and semantic universals.
Linguist Philos. 2023;46(2):259-289. doi: 10.1007/s10988-022-09362-1. Epub 2022 Aug 29.
6
Seeing inferences: brain dynamics and oculomotor signatures of non-verbal deduction.
Sci Rep. 2023 Feb 9;13(1):2341. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-29307-3.
7
Conjunctive bias in memory representations of logical connectives.
Mem Cognit. 2001 Sep;29(6):838-49. doi: 10.3758/bf03196413.
8
Do nonlinguistic creatures deploy mental symbols for logical connectives in reasoning?
Behav Brain Sci. 2023 Sep 28;46:e267. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X23001917.
9
Reasoning, integration, inference alteration, and text comprehension.
Can J Exp Psychol. 2004 Jun;58(2):133-41. doi: 10.1037/h0085793.
10
Processing Non-at-Issue Meanings of Conditional Connectives: The Contrast in German.
Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 10;12:629177. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.629177. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Precursors of logical reasoning in preverbal human infants.
Science. 2018 Mar 16;359(6381):1263-1266. doi: 10.1126/science.aao3539.
3
The emergence of reasoning by the disjunctive syllogism in early childhood.
Cognition. 2016 Sep;154:40-48. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.05.012. Epub 2016 May 28.
4
The logical primitives of thought: Empirical foundations for compositional cognitive models.
Psychol Rev. 2016 Jul;123(4):392-424. doi: 10.1037/a0039980. Epub 2016 Apr 14.
6
Artificial grammar learning meets formal language theory: an overview.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012 Jul 19;367(1598):1933-55. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0103.
8
Making disjunctions exclusive.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2008 Nov;61(11):1741-60. doi: 10.1080/17470210701712960.
9
Young children's productivity with word order and verb morphology.
Dev Psychol. 1997 Nov;33(6):952-65. doi: 10.1037//0012-1649.33.6.952.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验