Department of Sociology, FLAME University, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Department of Computer Science, FLAME University, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Front Public Health. 2022 Sep 30;10:966490. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.966490. eCollection 2022.
Globally, a gender gap in COVID-19 has been noted with men reporting higher share of both morbidity and deaths compared to women. While the gender gap in fatalities has been similar across the globe, there have been interesting disparities in the detection of COVID-19 cases in men and women. While wealthier, more developed nations have generally seen similar case detection in men and women, LMICs especially in Asia have seen far greater proportion of COVID-19 cases among men than women. We utilize age and sex-disaggregated data from the southern Indian state of Tamil Nadu across two waves of the pandemic (May 2020 - Nov 2020, and March 2021, to June 2021) and find that there were only ~70% as many detected COVID-19 cases among women as there were among men. Our initial reading suggested that this might be a protective effect of lower labor force participation rates among women across much of South Asia. However, subsequent sero-prevalence results from Tamil Nadu conducted on October-November 2020, and June-July, 2021 suggest that infection incidence has been similar among men and women; as is the case in countries with better health infrastructure. This empirical puzzle suggests that reduced case detection among women cannot be immediately associated with limited public exposure, but rather evidence of a chronic neglect of women in healthcare access. Overall, we contend that an attention to the gender context holds promise to effective interventions in detection and prevention that goes beyond the traditional epidemiological logic of diseases.
全球范围内,新冠疫情出现了性别差异,男性的发病率和死亡率均高于女性。尽管全球范围内的死亡率性别差异相似,但男性和女性的新冠病例检出率存在有趣的差异。在富裕、发达程度较高的国家,男性和女性的病例检出率大致相同,但在亚洲的中低收入国家,男性的新冠病例比例远远高于女性。我们利用印度南部泰米尔纳德邦在两次疫情浪潮(2020 年 5 月至 11 月和 2021 年 3 月至 6 月)中按年龄和性别细分的数据,发现女性的新冠病例检出率仅为男性的 70%左右。我们最初的解读是,这可能是南亚大部分地区女性劳动力参与率较低带来的保护效应。然而,随后于 2020 年 10 月至 11 月和 2021 年 6 月至 7 月在泰米尔纳德邦进行的血清阳性率结果表明,男性和女性的感染发生率相似;在拥有更好卫生基础设施的国家也是如此。这一经验性的困惑表明,女性病例检出率较低不能立即归因于公众接触有限,而是表明在获得医疗保健方面长期忽视了女性。总的来说,我们认为关注性别背景有望对检测和预防产生有效的干预措施,这超越了疾病的传统流行病学逻辑。