Zhu Liqiong, Zhang Wang, Zhu Jin, Chen Chaoqun, Mo Kunlun, Guo Huizhen, Wu Siqi, Huang Huaxing, Li Lingyu, Li Mingsen, Tan Jieying, Huang Ying, Wang Li, Ouyang Hong
State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Ophthalmol Sci. 2022 Mar 26;2(2):100148. doi: 10.1016/j.xops.2022.100148. eCollection 2022 Jun.
To propose an improved stem cell-based strategy for limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD) treatment.
Experimental randomized or parallel-group animal study.
Fifty adult male New Zealand white rabbits.
Human limbal stem/progenitor cells (LSCs) and limbal stromal stem/progenitor cells (LSSCs) were cultured in serum-free conditions and further differentiated into corneal epithelial cells and keratocytes, respectively. All cell types were characterized with lineage-specific markers. Gene expression analysis was performed to identify the potential function of LSSCs in corneal regeneration. Two LSCD models of rabbits for transplantations were used: transplantation performed at the time of limbal and corneal epithelial excision (LSCD model) and transplantation performed after clinical signs were induced in an LSCD model (pLSCD model). The pLSCD model better mimics the pathologic changes and symptoms of human LSCD. Rabbit models received LSC or LSC plus LSSC treatment. Corneal epithelial defects, neovascularization, and opacity were assessed every 3 weeks for 24 weeks. ZsGreen-labeled LSSCs were used for short-term tracking in vivo.
Rates of corneal epithelial defect area, corneal neovascularization and opacity scores, graft survival rate, and immunofluorescence staining of specific markers.
Both LSC transplantation and LSC plus LSSC cotransplantation effectively repaired the corneal surface in the LSCD model. These 2 strategies showed no significant differences in terms of graft survival rate or epithelial repair. However, corneal opacity was observed in the LSC group (in 3 of 8 rabbits), but not in the LSC plus LSSC group. Notably, when treating LSCD rabbits with distinguishable stromal opacification and neovascularization, cotransplantation of LSCs and LSSCs exhibited significantly better therapeutic effects than transplantation of LSCs alone, with graft survival rates of 87.5% and 37.5%, respectively. The implanted LSSCs could differentiate into keratocytes during the wound-healing process. RNA sequencing analysis showed that the stromal cells produced not only a collagen-rich extracellular matrix to facilitate reconstruction of the lamellar structure, but also niche factors that accelerated epithelial cell growth and inhibited angiogenesis and inflammation.
These findings highlight the support of stromal cells in niche homeostasis and tissue regeneration, providing LSC plus LSSC cotransplantation as a new treatment strategy for corneal blindness.
提出一种改进的基于干细胞的策略用于治疗角膜缘干细胞缺乏症(LSCD)。
实验性随机或平行组动物研究。
50只成年雄性新西兰白兔。
人角膜缘干细胞/祖细胞(LSCs)和角膜缘基质干细胞/祖细胞(LSSCs)在无血清条件下培养,并分别进一步分化为角膜上皮细胞和角膜细胞。所有细胞类型均用谱系特异性标记物进行表征。进行基因表达分析以确定LSSCs在角膜再生中的潜在功能。使用两种用于移植的兔LSCD模型:在角膜缘和角膜上皮切除时进行移植(LSCD模型)以及在LSCD模型中诱导出临床症状后进行移植(pLSCD模型)。pLSCD模型能更好地模拟人类LSCD的病理变化和症状。兔模型接受LSC或LSC加LSSC治疗。在24周内每3周评估一次角膜上皮缺损、新生血管形成和混浊情况。用ZsGreen标记的LSSCs用于体内短期追踪。
角膜上皮缺损面积率、角膜新生血管形成和混浊评分、移植物存活率以及特异性标记物的免疫荧光染色。
在LSCD模型中,LSC移植和LSC加LSSC共移植均有效修复了角膜表面。这两种策略在移植物存活率或上皮修复方面无显著差异。然而,在LSC组(8只兔中的3只)观察到角膜混浊,而在LSC加LSSC组中未观察到。值得注意的是,在治疗具有明显基质混浊和新生血管形成的LSCD兔时,LSCs和LSSCs共移植的治疗效果明显优于单独移植LSCs,移植物存活率分别为87.5%和37.5%。植入的LSSCs在伤口愈合过程中可分化为角膜细胞。RNA测序分析表明,基质细胞不仅产生富含胶原蛋白的细胞外基质以促进板层结构的重建,还产生小生境因子,加速上皮细胞生长并抑制血管生成和炎症。
这些发现突出了基质细胞在小生境稳态和组织再生中的支持作用,为角膜盲提供了LSC加LSSC共移植这一新的治疗策略。