Centre for Biodiversity and Environment Research, Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, UK.
Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, London, UK.
Glob Chang Biol. 2023 Jan;29(1):97-109. doi: 10.1111/gcb.16454. Epub 2022 Oct 17.
Human-induced environmental changes have a direct impact on species populations, with some species experiencing declines while others display population growth. Understanding why and how species populations respond differently to environmental changes is fundamental to mitigate and predict future biodiversity changes. Theoretically, species life-history strategies are key determinants shaping the response of populations to environmental impacts. Despite this, the association between species life histories and the response of populations to environmental changes has not been tested. In this study, we analysed the effects of recent land-cover and temperature changes on rates of population change of 1,072 populations recorded in the Living Planet Database. We selected populations with at least 5 yearly consecutive records (after imputation of missing population estimates) between 1992 and 2016, and for which we achieved high population imputation accuracy (in the cases where missing values had to be imputed). These populations were distributed across 553 different locations and included 461 terrestrial amniote vertebrate species (273 birds, 137 mammals, and 51 reptiles) with different life-history strategies. We showed that populations of fast-lived species inhabiting areas that have experienced recent expansion of cropland or bare soil present positive populations trends on average, whereas slow-lived species display negative population trends. Although these findings support previous hypotheses that fast-lived species are better adapted to recover their populations after an environmental perturbation, the sensitivity analysis revealed that model outcomes are strongly influenced by the addition or exclusion of populations with extreme rates of change. Therefore, the results should be interpreted with caution. With climate and land-use changes likely to increase in the future, establishing clear links between species characteristics and responses to these threats is fundamental for designing and conducting conservation actions. The results of this study can aid in evaluating population sensitivity, assessing the likely conservation status of species with poor data coverage, and predicting future scenarios of biodiversity change.
人类活动引起的环境变化直接影响物种种群,一些物种数量减少,而另一些物种数量增加。了解为什么和如何物种种群对环境变化的反应不同,对于减轻和预测未来生物多样性变化至关重要。从理论上讲,物种的生活史策略是决定种群对环境影响反应的关键因素。尽管如此,物种生活史与种群对环境变化的反应之间的联系尚未得到检验。在这项研究中,我们分析了最近的土地覆盖和温度变化对生活星球数据库中记录的 1072 个种群变化率的影响。我们选择了至少有 5 年连续记录(在缺失种群估计值后进行插补)的种群,即在 1992 年至 2016 年间,我们实现了高种群插补准确性(在必须进行缺失值插补的情况下)。这些种群分布在 553 个不同的地点,包括 461 种具有不同生活史策略的陆地羊膜动物脊椎动物(273 种鸟类、137 种哺乳动物和 51 种爬行动物)。我们表明,生活在农田或裸地最近扩张地区的快速生活史物种的种群平均呈正增长趋势,而缓慢生活史物种的种群呈负增长趋势。尽管这些发现支持了快速生活史物种在环境干扰后更能适应恢复其种群的先前假说,但敏感性分析表明,模型结果受到添加或排除变化率极端的种群的强烈影响。因此,结果应谨慎解释。随着未来气候和土地利用变化的增加,在这些威胁下建立物种特征与反应之间的明确联系对于设计和开展保护行动至关重要。本研究的结果可以帮助评估种群敏感性,评估数据覆盖不足的物种可能的保护状况,并预测未来生物多样性变化的情景。