• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年人糖尿病患者的长期用药依从性和预防与反应性护理利用。

Long-term medication adherence and preventive vs reactive care utilization among older adults with diabetes.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacotherapy, College of Pharmacy, The University of North Texas Health Science Center at Fort Worth, 3500 Camp Bowie Blvd, Fort Worth, TX 76107. Email:

出版信息

Am J Manag Care. 2022 Oct 1;28(10):e378-e387. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2022.89255.

DOI:10.37765/ajmc.2022.89255
PMID:36252178
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To assess long-term adherence to oral hypoglycemic agents (OHAs) and determine if adherence affects total health care expenditures of reactive vs preventive services.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

METHODS

This study measured adherence to OHAs using Medical Expenditure Panel Survey 2013-2017 data. Adults 65 years and older who had diabetes and were taking at least 1 OHA were included. Respondents with a medication possession ratio (MPR) of at least 80% were considered adherent. Health care utilization and expenditure were compared among adherent and nonadherent respondents for preventive and reactive services. Utilization data were analyzed using negative binomial regression and expenditure data using γ-family generalized linear regression models.

RESULTS

Approximately 67% of the cohort (n = 1279) were adherent. The adherent group had greater health care expenditure overall than nonadherent respondents ($29,985 [95% CI, $27,161-$32,743] vs $24,623 [95% CI, $21,623-$28,122]; P < .05). Although expenditure was higher for prescription medications and office visits, mean emergency department expenditures were higher for adherent respondents. The utilization and proportion of expenditure on preventive vs reactive health care services did not differ by adherence as defined by an MPR of at least 80%.

CONCLUSIONS

Increasing adherence provides an opportunity to improve CMS quality ratings. Our finding that adherence does not affect the financial burden of disease might be explained by the increased costs of preventive medication and increased comorbidity burden of these patients. Low adherence to OHAs encourages clinicians to be more proactive in ensuring that prescription medications are refilled regularly. By emphasizing equitable diabetes education and tailoring quality initiatives that minimize racial disparities, adherence can be better achieved.

摘要

目的

评估口服降糖药(OHA)的长期依从性,并确定依从性是否会影响反应性与预防性服务的总医疗保健支出。

研究设计

回顾性队列研究。

方法

本研究使用 2013-2017 年医疗支出调查(MEPS)数据来衡量 OHA 的依从性。纳入年龄≥65 岁且至少服用 1 种 OHA 的糖尿病患者。药物使用比例(MPR)≥80%的患者被认为是依从的。比较依从性和非依从性患者的预防性和反应性服务的医疗保健利用和支出。利用负二项回归分析利用数据,利用 γ 族广义线性回归模型分析支出数据。

结果

队列中约 67%(n=1279)的患者是依从的。与非依从性患者相比,依从性患者的整体医疗保健支出更高(29985 美元[95%CI,27161-32743]比 24623 美元[95%CI,21623-28122];P<.05)。尽管处方药和就诊的支出较高,但依从性患者的急诊支出均值更高。根据 MPR 至少为 80%的标准,依从性并未影响预防与反应性保健服务的利用和支出比例。

结论

提高依从性为改善医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)质量评级提供了机会。我们发现依从性不会影响疾病的经济负担,这可能是由于预防性药物成本增加以及这些患者合并症负担增加所致。OHA 的低依从性促使临床医生更加积极主动地确保定期补充处方药。通过强调公平的糖尿病教育并制定最大限度减少种族差异的质量计划,可以更好地实现依从性。

相似文献

1
Long-term medication adherence and preventive vs reactive care utilization among older adults with diabetes.老年人糖尿病患者的长期用药依从性和预防与反应性护理利用。
Am J Manag Care. 2022 Oct 1;28(10):e378-e387. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2022.89255.
2
Evaluating the relationship between quality measure adherence definitions and economic outcomes in commercial health plans: a retrospective diabetes cohort study.评估商业健康计划中质量衡量标准遵守情况的定义与经济结果之间的关系:一项回顾性糖尿病队列研究。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2021 Jan;27(1):64-72. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2021.27.1.064.
3
The Impact of Patient-Centered Medical Homes on Quality of Care and Medication Adherence in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus.患者为中心的医疗之家对糖尿病患者的医疗质量和药物依从性的影响。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2016 Nov;22(11):1272-1284. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2016.22.11.1272.
4
Association of Medication Adherence with Hospital Utilization and Costs Among Elderly with Diabetes Enrolled in a State Pharmaceutical Assistance Program.在参加州立药品援助计划的老年糖尿病患者中,药物治疗依从性与医院利用度和费用的关系。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2020 Sep;26(9):1099-1108. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2020.26.9.1099.
5
A Payer Perspective of the Costs of Urinary Tract and Skin and Soft Tissue Infections in Adults with Diabetes and the Relationship to Oral Antidiabetic Medication Nonadherence.从支付方角度看糖尿病成人泌尿道和皮肤及软组织感染的成本,以及其与口服抗糖尿病药物不依从的关系。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2019 Dec;25(12):1409-1419. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2019.19052. Epub 2019 Aug 22.
6
Does increased adherence to medications change health care financial burdens for adults with diabetes?增加药物依从性是否会改变成年糖尿病患者的医疗保健经济负担?
J Diabetes. 2015 Nov;7(6):872-80. doi: 10.1111/1753-0407.12292. Epub 2015 May 6.
7
Depression in patients with type 2 diabetes: impact on adherence to oral hypoglycemic agents.2型糖尿病患者的抑郁:对口服降糖药依从性的影响。
Ann Pharmacother. 2006 Apr;40(4):605-11. doi: 10.1345/aph.1G606. Epub 2006 Mar 21.
8
Venue of receiving diabetes self-management education and training and its impact on oral diabetic medication adherence.接受糖尿病自我管理教育与培训的地点及其对口服降糖药物依从性的影响。
Prim Care Diabetes. 2017 Apr;11(2):162-170. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2016.10.005. Epub 2016 Nov 10.
9
Impact of adherence to interferons in the treatment of multiple sclerosis: a non-experimental, retrospective, cohort study.多发性硬化症治疗中干扰素依从性的影响:一项非实验性、回顾性、队列研究。
Clin Drug Investig. 2010;30(2):89-100. doi: 10.2165/11533330-000000000-00000.
10
Elements of the Veterans Health Administration Patient-Centered Medical Home are Associated with Greater Adherence to Oral Hypoglycemic Agents in Patients with Diabetes.退伍军人健康管理局以患者为中心的医疗之家的要素与糖尿病患者对口服降糖药的更高依从性相关。
Popul Health Manag. 2018 Apr;21(2):116-122. doi: 10.1089/pop.2017.0039. Epub 2017 Jul 5.