• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
GPs' perceptions of teaching methods in shared decision-making training: a qualitative study.全科医生对共享决策培训中教学方法的看法:一项定性研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2023 Mar 30;73(729):e310-e317. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2022.0194. Print 2023 Apr.
2
General practitioners' perceptions of pharmacists working in general practice: a qualitative interview study.全科医生对在全科医疗中工作的药剂师的看法:一项定性访谈研究。
Fam Pract. 2023 Mar 28;40(2):377-386. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmac115.
3
Role of GPs in shared decision making with patients about palliative cancer treatment: a qualitative study in the Netherlands.全科医生在与癌症患者共同决策姑息治疗中的作用:荷兰的一项定性研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2022 Mar 31;72(717):e276-e284. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2021.0446. Print 2022 Apr.
4
Shared decision-making performance of general practice residents: an observational study combining observer, resident, and patient perspectives.全科住院医师的共享决策表现:一项结合观察者、住院医师和患者视角的观察性研究。
Fam Pract. 2024 Feb 28;41(1):50-59. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmad125.
5
Integrating training in evidence-based medicine and shared decision-making: a qualitative study of junior doctors and consultants.将循证医学和共同决策培训相结合:对初级医生和顾问的定性研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Apr 18;24(1):418. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05409-y.
6
Shared decision making between older people with multimorbidity and GPs: a qualitative study.老年人合并多种疾病与全科医生之间的共同决策:一项定性研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2022 Jul 28;72(721):e609-e618. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2021.0529. Print 2022 Aug.
7
Roles of general practitioners in shared decision-making for patients with cancer: A qualitative study.全科医生在癌症患者共同决策中的作用:一项定性研究。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2022 Jul;31(4):e13594. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13594. Epub 2022 Apr 13.
8
Implementation of evidence-based knowledge in general practice.循证医学知识在全科医疗中的应用。
Dan Med J. 2017 Dec;64(12).
9
Through the Eyes of Patients: The Effect of Training General Practitioners and Nurses on Perceived Shared Decision-Making Support.从患者的角度看:培训全科医生和护士对感知到的共同决策支持的影响。
Med Decis Making. 2024 Jan;44(1):76-88. doi: 10.1177/0272989X231203693. Epub 2023 Oct 24.
10
General practitioners and decision-making capacity assessment: the experiences and educational needs of New Zealand general practitioners.全科医生和决策能力评估:新西兰全科医生的经验和教育需求。
Fam Pract. 2020 Sep 5;37(4):535-540. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmaa022.

引用本文的文献

1
The experience of shared decision-making for people with asthma: A systematic review and metasynthesis of qualitative studies.哮喘患者共享决策的体验:系统评价和定性研究的荟萃分析。
Health Expect. 2024 Apr;27(2):e14039. doi: 10.1111/hex.14039.
2
Continuity of care and effective clinical experience overcoming medicolegal vulnerability.持续的医疗服务和有效的临床经验可克服医疗法律方面的脆弱性。
Br J Gen Pract. 2023 Mar 30;73(729):156. doi: 10.3399/bjgp23X732333. Print 2023 Apr.

本文引用的文献

1
A working partnership: A review of shared decision-making in nephrology.协作共赢:肾脏病学中共享决策的综述。
Nephrology (Carlton). 2021 Nov;26(11):851-857. doi: 10.1111/nep.13902. Epub 2021 May 30.
2
When face-to-face interviews are not possible: tips and tricks for video, telephone, online chat, and email interviews in qualitative research.当无法进行面对面访谈时:定性研究中视频、电话、在线聊天和电子邮件访谈的技巧和窍门。
Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2021 May 22;20(4):392-396. doi: 10.1093/eurjcn/zvab038.
3
Learning shared decision-making in clinical practice.在临床实践中学习共同决策。
Patient Educ Couns. 2021 May;104(5):1206-1212. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.09.034. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
4
Teaching clinicians shared decision making and risk communication online: an evaluation study.在线教授临床医生共同决策和风险沟通:一项评估研究。
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2021 Oct;26(5):253. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2020-111521. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
5
What makes a patient ready for Shared Decision Making? A qualitative study.患者准备好参与共享决策的因素是什么?一项定性研究。
Patient Educ Couns. 2021 Mar;104(3):571-577. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.08.031. Epub 2020 Sep 13.
6
Interventions to facilitate shared decision-making using decision aids with patients in Primary Health Care: A systematic review.在初级卫生保健中使用决策辅助工具促进患者共同决策的干预措施:一项系统综述。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Aug 7;99(32):e21389. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000021389.
7
Educational programs to teach shared decision making to medical trainees: A systematic review.医学实习生共享决策教学教育计划:系统评价。
Patient Educ Couns. 2020 Jun;103(6):1082-1094. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.12.016. Epub 2020 Jan 13.
8
How to … be reflexive when conducting qualitative research.如何在进行定性研究时保持反思性。
Clin Teach. 2020 Feb;17(1):9-12. doi: 10.1111/tct.13133.
9
Educating Dutch General Practitioners in Dementia Advance Care Planning: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.对荷兰全科医生进行痴呆症预先医疗照护计划教育:一项群组随机对照试验。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020 Jun;21(6):837-842.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2019.09.010. Epub 2019 Nov 20.
10
Patient-centered communication and shared decision making to reduce HbA1c levels of patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus - results of the cluster-randomized controlled DEBATE trial.以患者为中心的沟通和共同决策,以降低血糖控制不佳的 2 型糖尿病患者的 HbA1c 水平 - DEBATE 试验的集群随机对照结果。
BMC Fam Pract. 2019 Jun 25;20(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s12875-019-0977-9.

全科医生对共享决策培训中教学方法的看法:一项定性研究。

GPs' perceptions of teaching methods in shared decision-making training: a qualitative study.

机构信息

University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter; Royal Cornwall Hospital NHS Trust, Truro.

University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter.

出版信息

Br J Gen Pract. 2023 Mar 30;73(729):e310-e317. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2022.0194. Print 2023 Apr.

DOI:10.3399/BJGP.2022.0194
PMID:36253111
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9591016/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although shared decision making (SDM) is key to delivering patient-centred care, there are barriers to GPs implementing SDM in practice. SDM training is undergoing development by organisations, including the Royal College of General Practitioners. However, GPs' perceptions of the delivery of SDM training in general practice remain largely unexplored.

AIM

To explore GPs' perceptions of teaching methods in SDM training.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Qualitative study of GPs with teaching roles at the University of Exeter Medical School.

METHOD

Purposive sampling recruited 14 GPs. Semi-structured interviews explored their SDM educational experiences. Data were analysed using thematic framework analysis.

RESULTS

Three themes were identified. The GPs described role-play, receiving feedback, and on-the-job learning as modes of delivering SDM training that mostly informed their SDM in clinical practice positively. Learning from knowledgeable individuals and using realistic patient cases were perceived as beneficial components of SDM learning, although most learning occurred implicitly through reflections on their clinical experiences. The GPs identified that their training on SDM should reflect the uncertainty that is present when sharing decisions with patients in real-life general practice consultations. GPs also identified the targeting of individual GPs' SDM learning needs and explanation of the potential benefits of SDM on consultation outcomes as important methods to facilitate the implementation of SDM in practice.

CONCLUSION

To the authors' knowledge, this is the first UK study to explore GPs' perceptions of SDM training and provide recommendations for practice. As SDM occurs in partnership with patients, further research should obtain and incorporate patients' views alongside those of GPs in the evaluation of future programmes.

摘要

背景

尽管共享决策(SDM)是提供以患者为中心的护理的关键,但全科医生在实践中实施 SDM 仍存在障碍。包括皇家全科医师学院在内的组织正在对 SDM 培训进行开发。然而,全科医生对一般实践中 SDM 培训的实施的看法在很大程度上仍未得到探索。

目的

探讨全科医生对 SDM 培训教学方法的看法。

设计和设置

对埃克塞特大学医学院有教学角色的全科医生进行定性研究。

方法

采用目的抽样法招募了 14 名全科医生。半结构化访谈探讨了他们的 SDM 教育经验。使用主题框架分析对数据进行分析。

结果

确定了三个主题。全科医生描述了角色扮演、接受反馈和在职学习是提供 SDM 培训的模式,这些模式主要对他们在临床实践中的 SDM 产生了积极的影响。向有知识的人学习和使用现实的患者病例被认为是 SDM 学习的有益组成部分,尽管大多数学习是通过对临床经验的反思而隐含发生的。全科医生认为,他们的 SDM 培训应该反映在现实的一般实践咨询中与患者分享决策时存在的不确定性。全科医生还确定,针对个别全科医生的 SDM 学习需求,并解释 SDM 对咨询结果的潜在益处,是促进实践中 SDM 实施的重要方法。

结论

据作者所知,这是第一项探索英国全科医生对 SDM 培训的看法并为实践提供建议的研究。由于 SDM 是与患者合作进行的,因此应在评估未来的计划时,从患者和全科医生的角度获取并纳入他们对 SDM 的看法。