Iliopoulos Fotios, Dimitriadis Zacharias, Koumantakis George A
Health Sciences Faculty, Metropolitan College, University of East London (UEL), Athens, Greece.
Physiotherapy Department, Attikon General University Hospital, Athens, Greece.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2022 Jul-Aug;45(6):459-468. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2022.09.001. Epub 2022 Oct 15.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the electromyographic activity of the sternocleidomastoid muscle during the performance of the craniocervical flexion test (CCFT) in individuals with neck pain and healthy volunteers, assess the reliability of this method, and examine possible between-population differences.
Electromyographic activity of the sternocleidomastoid muscles of 22 individuals with neck pain and 22 healthy participants was recorded during the 55 stages of the CCFT. Pain (visual analog scale) and disability (Neck Disability Index) levels and pain duration were recorded for the participants with neck pain. Reliability of electromyography was evaluated with the intraclass correlation coefficient, standard error of measurement, and minimum detectable change.
Within-day reliability indices of electromyographic activity were very good to excellent (intraclass correlation coefficients, 0.86-0.98; standard error of measurement, 1.8%-7.6%; minimum detectable change, 5.0%-21.1%). For the head-lift normalization method, 2-way analysis of variance revealed significant between-group differences (P < .02); however, these were not clinically significant when reliability test-retest error was considered. Differences between contraction levels were significant (P < .001); however, the group by contraction level interaction factor was nonsignificant. Therefore, the between-groups electromyographic increases noted with increasing contraction levels were similar. No correlation was identified between participants' electromyography data and pain or disability.
In participants with moderate pain, disability, and pain duration, no clear alterations in electromyographic activity of the sternocleidomastoid could be detected with the CCFT. Reliability of the test used was very good.
本研究旨在评估颈痛患者和健康志愿者在进行颅颈屈曲试验(CCFT)时胸锁乳突肌的肌电活动,评估该方法的可靠性,并检查不同人群之间可能存在的差异。
在CCFT的5个阶段记录了22名颈痛患者和22名健康参与者胸锁乳突肌的肌电活动。记录了颈痛患者的疼痛(视觉模拟量表)、功能障碍(颈部功能障碍指数)水平和疼痛持续时间。通过组内相关系数、测量标准误差和最小可检测变化评估肌电图的可靠性。
肌电活动的日内可靠性指标非常好至优秀(组内相关系数,0.86 - 0.98;测量标准误差,1.8% - 7.6%;最小可检测变化,5.0% - 21.1%)。对于抬头归一化方法,双向方差分析显示组间存在显著差异(P <.02);然而,考虑可靠性重测误差时,这些差异无临床意义。收缩水平之间的差异显著(P <.001);然而,收缩水平与组的交互因子不显著。因此,随着收缩水平增加,组间肌电增加相似。参与者的肌电图数据与疼痛或功能障碍之间未发现相关性。
在中度疼痛、功能障碍和疼痛持续时间的参与者中,CCFT未检测到胸锁乳突肌肌电活动有明显改变。所用测试的可靠性非常好。