• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

术中数字与传统标本乳腺钼靶在乳腺癌切缘评估中的比较:初步研究。

Comparison of margin assessment between intraoperative digital and conventional specimen mammography in breast cancer: A preliminary study.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu, South Korea.

Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu, South Korea.

出版信息

Asian J Surg. 2023 May;46(5):1931-1936. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2022.09.094. Epub 2022 Oct 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.asjsur.2022.09.094
PMID:36253258
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although breast surgeons can request frozen section biopsies to evaluate margin status in breast-conserving surgery (BCS), specimen imaging is also a useful assessment tool. Intraoperative digital specimen mammography (IDSM) has recently been introduced in Korea. To estimate the clinical role of IDSM, this study compared the clinicopathologic factors of patients whose specimen was assessed with IDSM with those assessed using conventional specimen mammography (CSM).

METHODS

From October to December 2021, 78 breast cancer patients who underwent BCS were included in this study. The obtained specimens were assessed using IDSM (n = 44) and CSM (n = 34). Clinicopathologic factors included margin involvement status in specimen mammography and the results of frozen section biopsies. The radiation dose emitted from the specimen after mammography was measured using a portable device.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in clinicopathological factors between the two groups, except the type of surgery for axillary lymph nodes. The closest distance from the margin to tumor was longer in the CSM group than in the IDSM group, although the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.894). Margin involvement was accurately detected using IDSM due to the absence of compression (p < 0.001). In addition, the sensitivity and accuracy of IDSM were higher, and the false-negative rate was lower.

CONCLUSION

Both specimen mammography methods were highly accurate in evaluating the margin involvement status. However, the margin status could be examined more precisely using IDSM because the specimen was not compressed to perform the examination. Because the IDSM system was installed in the operating room, it not only shortened performing routes but also reduced the operating time by providing immediate results.

摘要

背景

尽管乳腺外科医生可以要求进行冷冻切片活检以评估保乳手术 (BCS) 中的切缘状态,但标本成像也是一种有用的评估工具。术中数字标本乳腺 X 线摄影术 (IDSM) 最近在韩国推出。为了评估 IDSM 的临床作用,本研究比较了使用 IDSM 评估标本的患者与使用传统标本乳腺 X 线摄影术 (CSM) 评估标本的患者的临床病理因素。

方法

本研究纳入了 2021 年 10 月至 12 月期间接受 BCS 的 78 例乳腺癌患者。获得的标本分别使用 IDSM(n=44)和 CSM(n=34)进行评估。临床病理因素包括标本乳腺 X 线摄影术的切缘受累状态和冷冻切片活检的结果。使用便携式设备测量乳腺 X 线摄影术后标本发出的辐射剂量。

结果

除腋窝淋巴结手术类型外,两组患者的临床病理因素无显著差异。CSM 组标本的切缘到肿瘤的最近距离大于 IDSM 组,尽管差异无统计学意义(p=0.894)。由于不存在压迫,IDSM 可准确检测到切缘受累(p<0.001)。此外,IDSM 的敏感性和准确性更高,假阴性率更低。

结论

两种标本乳腺 X 线摄影方法在评估切缘受累状态方面均具有高度准确性。然而,由于标本未受压进行检查,因此使用 IDSM 可以更精确地检查切缘状态。由于 IDSM 系统安装在手术室中,不仅缩短了操作路径,还通过提供即时结果缩短了手术时间。

相似文献

1
Comparison of margin assessment between intraoperative digital and conventional specimen mammography in breast cancer: A preliminary study.术中数字与传统标本乳腺钼靶在乳腺癌切缘评估中的比较:初步研究。
Asian J Surg. 2023 May;46(5):1931-1936. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2022.09.094. Epub 2022 Oct 15.
2
The Effect of Intraoperative Margin Assessment During Breast Conserving Surgery for Breast Cancer in a Dutch Cohort.荷兰队列研究中保乳手术时术中切缘评估对乳腺癌的影响。
Clin Breast Cancer. 2024 Jan;24(1):e31-e39. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2023.10.002. Epub 2023 Oct 12.
3
An evaluation of intraoperative digital specimen mammography versus conventional specimen radiography for the excision of nonpalpable breast lesions.评价术中数字标本乳腺摄影与传统标本放射照相术在切除不可触及的乳腺病变中的应用。
Am J Surg. 2013 Jun;205(6):703-10. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2012.08.010. Epub 2013 Mar 7.
4
Intraoperative digital specimen mammography: rapid, accurate results expedite surgery.术中数字化乳腺标本摄影:快速、准确的结果加快手术进程。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2007 Apr;14(4):1478-85. doi: 10.1245/s10434-006-9126-5. Epub 2007 Jan 18.
5
Intraoperative digital specimen mammography: a significant improvement in operative efficiency.术中数字化标本乳腺摄影:提高手术效率的显著改进。
Am J Surg. 2013 Oct;206(4):526-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.01.046. Epub 2013 Jun 25.
6
Comparison of the time taken for localised breast surgery pre- and post-introduction of intra-operative digital specimen mammography.术中数字标本乳腺摄影引入前后局部乳腺手术所需时间的比较。
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2018 Feb;62(1):39-42. doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.12623. Epub 2017 May 16.
7
Can We Do Breast-Conserving Surgery Without Intraoperative Frozen Section of Margin?可否在术中不进行边缘冰冻切片的情况下进行保乳手术?
Clin Breast Cancer. 2024 Apr;24(3):191-198. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2024.01.019. Epub 2024 Jan 29.
8
Diagnostic accuracy of resection margin in specimen radiography: digital breast tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography.乳腺断层摄影术与全数字化乳腺摄影术对切缘诊断准确性的比较
Radiol Med. 2021 Jun;126(6):768-773. doi: 10.1007/s11547-021-01337-9. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
9
Intraoperative breast specimen assessment in breast conserving surgery: comparison between standard mammography imaging and a remote radiological system.保乳手术中术中乳腺标本评估:标准乳腺摄影成像与远程放射学系统的比较。
Br J Radiol. 2020 May 1;93(1109):20190785. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20190785. Epub 2020 Feb 28.
10
Correlation of intra operative specimen imaging with final histopathology in breast conserving surgery for breast cancer.乳腺癌保乳手术术中标本影像学与最终组织病理学的相关性。
J Pak Med Assoc. 2024 Feb;74(2):252-263. doi: 10.47391/JPMA.8397.