Suppr超能文献

虚拟护理在急诊科观察单元的影响

The Impact of Virtual Care in an Emergency Department Observation Unit.

作者信息

Abiri Autherine, Keadey Matthew, Hughes George, Pitts Stephen R, Moran Tim P, Ross Michael A

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA; Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Emory University.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.

出版信息

Ann Emerg Med. 2023 Feb;81(2):222-233. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2022.07.003. Epub 2022 Oct 15.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE(S): We report the impact of telemedicine virtual rounding in emergency department observation units (EDOU) on the effectiveness, safety, and cost relative to traditional observation care.

METHODS

In this retrospective diff-in-diff study, we compared observation visit outcomes from 2 EDOUs before (pre) and after (post) full adoption of telemedicine rounding tele-observation (tele-obs) with usual care in control EDOU and care in a hospital bed in an integrated health system without tele-obs. Tele-obs physicians did not work at the control hospital. Outcomes were the length of stay, total direct costs, admission status, and adverse events (ICU and death). Difference-in-differences modeling evaluated outcomes with covariates including age, sex, payer type, and clinical classification software diagnostic category. Data from a system data warehouse and a cost accounting database were used.

RESULTS

Of the 20,861 EDOU visits, 15,630 (74.9%) were seen in the preperiod and 6,657 (31.9%) in control EDOU. Of 23,055 non-EDOU inpatient visits assigned to observation status (nonobservation unit), 76% were seen in the preperiod. Adjusted length of stay was not significantly different for tele-obs and control EDOUs (26.4 hours versus 23.5 hours), which remained lower than in hospital settings (37.9 hours). The pre-post diff-in-diff was not significant (P=.78). Inpatient admission status was similar for tele-obs and control EDOUs (20.9% versus 22.4.%) and lower than in hospital settings (30.3%). Prepost odds ratios for inpatient admission and adverse outcomes did not change significantly for all study groups. Adjusted costs increased over time for all settings; however, the prepost median cost change was not significantly different between tele-obs EDOUs and control EDOUs ($162.5 versus $235) and was lower than the change for control hospital settings ($783). Median tele-obs EDOU cost over both periods ($1,541) remained significantly lower than hospital costs ($2,413).

CONCLUSION

Using tele-obs to manage observation patients in an ED observation unit was not associated with significant differences in length of stay, admission status, measured adverse events, or total direct cost.

摘要

研究目的

我们报告了急诊科观察病房(EDOU)采用远程医疗虚拟查房相对于传统观察护理在有效性、安全性和成本方面的影响。

方法

在这项回顾性双重差分研究中,我们比较了两个EDOU在全面采用远程医疗查房远程观察(远程观察)之前(前)和之后(后)的观察就诊结果,对照组EDOU采用常规护理,而在一个没有远程观察的综合医疗系统中,在医院病床接受护理。远程观察医生不在对照医院工作。结果指标包括住院时间、总直接成本、入院状态和不良事件(入住重症监护病房和死亡)。双重差分模型评估了包括年龄、性别、付款人类型和临床分类软件诊断类别等协变量的结果。使用了系统数据仓库和成本核算数据库中的数据。

结果

在20,861次EDOU就诊中,15,630次(74.9%)发生在前期,6,657次(31.9%)发生在对照EDOU。在分配为观察状态的23,055次非EDOU住院就诊(非观察病房)中,76%发生在前期。远程观察EDOU和对照EDOU的调整后住院时间无显著差异(26.4小时对23.5小时),均低于医院环境(37.9小时)。前后双重差分不显著(P = 0.78)。远程观察EDOU和对照EDOU的住院入院状态相似(20.9%对22.4%),且低于医院环境(30.3%)。所有研究组的住院入院和不良结局的前后比值比均无显著变化。所有环境下的调整成本随时间增加;然而,远程观察EDOU和对照EDOU的前后中位数成本变化无显著差异(162.5美元对235美元),且低于对照医院环境的变化(783美元)。两个时期远程观察EDOU的中位数成本(1,541美元)仍显著低于医院成本(2,413美元)。

结论

在ED观察病房使用远程观察管理观察患者在住院时间、入院状态、测量的不良事件或总直接成本方面无显著差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验