Combining nutritional status with TNM stage: a physiological update on gastric cancer staging for improving prognostic accuracy in elderly patients.

BACKGROUND

The tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging system does not take the patient's physiological status into consideration, reportedly making it insufficient for predicting survival outcomes in frail cancer patients. We assessed the prognostic values of several nutrition- and inflammation-based markers in combination with pTNM stage in gastric carcinoma (GC) patients.

METHODS

In total, 1166 patients undergoing GC surgery were studied. The prognostic capabilities of 3 nutritional and 3 systemic inflammatory parameters were examined. We developed new staging systems by adding these markers, individually, to the pTNM stage. We then compared the prognostic capabilities of our new systems with that of pTNM stage alone. We also assessed the prognostic values of these systems by dividing our patient cohort into elderly (≥ 65 years) and non-elderly groups.

RESULTS

Our novel staging systems had greater predictive capabilities for overall survival (OS) than pTNM alone. Most notably, survival discrimination was significantly increased for pTNM when it was combined with albumin-based nutritional indices (geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) and prognostic nutritional index (PNI)). Our new staging systems incorporating GNRI or PNI into pTNM had significantly better predictive capability for OS, especially non-GC mortality, than pTNM alone in elderly GC patients. In the non-elderly patients, the predictive capabilities of the new staging systems for OS differed minimally from that of pTNM.

CONCLUSIONS

The predictive capability of pTNM stage was particularly enhanced when this parameter was combined with nutritional markers. Our new approach aids in predicting survival outcomes, especially non-GC-related death, in elderly GC patients.