Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Pediatr Int. 2022 Jan;64(1):e15276. doi: 10.1111/ped.15276.
Drug utilization evaluation (DUE) is a systematic, criteria-based assessment of medicine that aims to optimize the appropriateness of antibiotic prescription. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of the DUE on prescriptions of two commonly used antibiotics in a pediatric population, cefepime and piperacillin/tazobactam, in a tertiary care hospital.
This quasi-experimental study was conducted at the Department of Pediatrics, Ramathibodi Hospital, between March 2020 and August 2021. All hospitalized children aged 1 month to 20 years who received at least one dose of cefepime or piperacillin/tazobactam were enrolled. Before implementing the DUE, cefepime and piperacillin/tazobactam prescriptions were retrospectively evaluated using the DUE criteria. During the 6 month DUE implementation period, physicians voluntarily chose to use DUE to assess the prescriptions' appropriateness. Demographic data, antibiotic use, and clinical data were recorded.
There were 304 prescriptions of cefepime and piperacillin/tazobactam, with 108 empirical prescriptions (72 patients) in the DUE group and 158 prescriptions (138 patients) in the non-DUE group. The appropriateness of empirical prescriptions of cefepime and piperacillin/tazobactam was significantly higher in the DUE group (93.5% vs. 83.5%; P = 0.003). Drug utilization evaluation was significantly associated with appropriate empirical prescriptions (adjusted OR 5.32: 95% CI 1.80-15.73; P = 0.003). Prescriptions in critical care wards and urinary tract infections (UTIs) were associated with not fulfilling the DUE criteria for appropriateness.
Drug utilization evaluation could improve the appropriateness of empirical use of cefepime and piperacillin/tazobactam in pediatric patients. Patients in critical care units and with UTIs appeared to be associated with inappropriate empirical treatment.
药物利用评估(DUE)是一种系统的、基于标准的药物评估,旨在优化抗生素处方的适当性。本研究旨在评估 DUE 在儿科人群中两种常用抗生素(头孢吡肟和哌拉西林/他唑巴坦)处方中的作用,该研究在三级保健医院进行。
这是一项在 2020 年 3 月至 2021 年 8 月期间在 Ramathibodi 医院儿科进行的准实验研究。所有接受至少一剂头孢吡肟或哌拉西林/他唑巴坦的 1 个月至 20 岁住院儿童均被纳入研究。在实施 DUE 之前,使用 DUE 标准回顾性评估头孢吡肟和哌拉西林/他唑巴坦的处方。在 6 个月的 DUE 实施期间,医生自愿选择使用 DUE 来评估处方的适当性。记录人口统计学数据、抗生素使用情况和临床数据。
共有 304 例头孢吡肟和哌拉西林/他唑巴坦处方,其中 DUE 组有 108 例经验性处方(72 例患者),非 DUE 组有 158 例处方(138 例患者)。头孢吡肟和哌拉西林/他唑巴坦经验性处方的适当性在 DUE 组明显更高(93.5%比 83.5%;P=0.003)。药物利用评估与适当的经验性处方显著相关(调整后的 OR 5.32:95%CI 1.80-15.73;P=0.003)。重症监护病房和尿路感染(UTI)的处方与不符合 DUE 适当性标准有关。
药物利用评估可以提高儿科患者头孢吡肟和哌拉西林/他唑巴坦经验性使用的适当性。重症监护病房的患者和患有 UTI 的患者似乎与不适当的经验性治疗有关。