• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项针对社区获得性肺炎(CAP)危重症患者中头孢吡肟和哌拉西林/他唑巴坦的靶向似然比估计的比较。

A targeted likelihood estimation comparing cefepime and piperacillin/tazobactam in critically ill patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP).

机构信息

Unisabana Center for Translational Science, Universidad de La Sabana, Chía, Colombia.

School of Medicine, Universidad de La Sabana, Chía, Colombia.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 11;14(1):13392. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-64444-3.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-64444-3
PMID:38862579
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11166966/
Abstract

Cefepime and piperacillin/tazobactam are antimicrobials recommended by IDSA/ATS guidelines for the empirical management of patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Concerns have been raised about which should be used in clinical practice. This study aims to compare the effect of cefepime and piperacillin/tazobactam in critically ill CAP patients through a targeted maximum likelihood estimation (TMLE). A total of 2026 ICU-admitted patients with CAP were included. Among them, (47%) presented respiratory failure, and (27%) developed septic shock. A total of (68%) received cefepime and (32%) piperacillin/tazobactam-based treatment. After running the TMLE, we found that cefepime and piperacillin/tazobactam-based treatments have comparable 28-day, hospital, and ICU mortality. Additionally, age, PTT, serum potassium and temperature were associated with preferring cefepime over piperacillin/tazobactam (OR 1.14 95% CI [1.01-1.27], p = 0.03), (OR 1.14 95% CI [1.03-1.26], p = 0.009), (OR 1.1 95% CI [1.01-1.22], p = 0.039) and (OR 1.13 95% CI [1.03-1.24], p = 0.014)]. Our study found a similar mortality rate among ICU-admitted CAP patients treated with cefepime and piperacillin/tazobactam. Clinicians may consider factors such as availability and safety profiles when making treatment decisions.

摘要

头孢吡肟和哌拉西林/他唑巴坦是 IDSA/ATS 指南推荐用于经验性治疗因社区获得性肺炎(CAP)入住重症监护病房(ICU)的患者的抗菌药物。人们对在临床实践中应使用哪种药物存在担忧。本研究旨在通过靶向最大似然估计(TMLE)比较头孢吡肟和哌拉西林/他唑巴坦在重症 CAP 患者中的疗效。共纳入 2026 例 ICU 收治的 CAP 患者。其中,(47%)出现呼吸衰竭,(27%)发生感染性休克。(68%)接受头孢吡肟治疗,(32%)接受哌拉西林/他唑巴坦治疗。在运行 TMLE 后,我们发现头孢吡肟和哌拉西林/他唑巴坦治疗的 28 天、住院和 ICU 死亡率相当。此外,年龄、PTT、血清钾和体温与更倾向于使用头孢吡肟而非哌拉西林/他唑巴坦有关(OR 1.14 95%CI [1.01-1.27],p=0.03),(OR 1.14 95%CI [1.03-1.26],p=0.009),(OR 1.1 95%CI [1.01-1.22],p=0.039)和(OR 1.13 95%CI [1.03-1.24],p=0.014)。我们的研究发现,使用头孢吡肟和哌拉西林/他唑巴坦治疗的 ICU 收治的 CAP 患者死亡率相似。临床医生在做出治疗决策时可以考虑药物的可及性和安全性等因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0126/11166966/380c4c8fb2f1/41598_2024_64444_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0126/11166966/1559efe034f7/41598_2024_64444_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0126/11166966/99e6603cb3c5/41598_2024_64444_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0126/11166966/95ac28474f29/41598_2024_64444_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0126/11166966/028b83d25469/41598_2024_64444_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0126/11166966/380c4c8fb2f1/41598_2024_64444_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0126/11166966/1559efe034f7/41598_2024_64444_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0126/11166966/99e6603cb3c5/41598_2024_64444_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0126/11166966/95ac28474f29/41598_2024_64444_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0126/11166966/028b83d25469/41598_2024_64444_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0126/11166966/380c4c8fb2f1/41598_2024_64444_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A targeted likelihood estimation comparing cefepime and piperacillin/tazobactam in critically ill patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP).一项针对社区获得性肺炎(CAP)危重症患者中头孢吡肟和哌拉西林/他唑巴坦的靶向似然比估计的比较。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 11;14(1):13392. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-64444-3.
2
Clinical outcomes following treatment of Enterobacter species pneumonia with piperacillin/tazobactam compared to cefepime or ertapenem.与头孢吡肟或厄他培南相比,哌拉西林/他唑巴坦治疗肠杆菌属肺炎的临床转归。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2019 Dec;54(6):824-828. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2019.07.008. Epub 2019 Jul 15.
3
Mortality of Patients With Sepsis Administered Piperacillin-Tazobactam vs Cefepime.哌拉西林他唑巴坦与头孢吡肟治疗脓毒症患者的死亡率。
JAMA Intern Med. 2024 Jul 1;184(7):769-777. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.0581.
4
A Large-Scale Multicenter Retrospective Study on Nephrotoxicity Associated With Empiric Broad-Spectrum Antibiotics in Critically Ill Patients.一项关于重症患者经验性广谱抗生素相关肾毒性的大规模多中心回顾性研究。
Chest. 2023 Aug;164(2):355-368. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2023.03.046. Epub 2023 Apr 9.
5
Effectiveness of third-generation cephalosporins or piperacillin compared with cefepime or carbapenems for severe infections caused by wild-type AmpC β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales: A multi-centre retrospective propensity-weighted study.三代头孢菌素或哌拉西林与头孢吡肟或碳青霉烯类药物治疗产野生型 AmpC 酶肠杆菌科所致重症感染的疗效比较:一项多中心回顾性倾向评分匹配研究。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2023 Jul;62(1):106809. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2023.106809. Epub 2023 Apr 6.
6
Clinical effectiveness of branded versus generic piperacillin-tazobactam for treating severe community-acquired pneumonia.品牌哌拉西林他唑巴坦与 generic(通用名)哌拉西林他唑巴坦治疗重症社区获得性肺炎的临床疗效比较。
J Infect Public Health. 2022 Sep;15(9):961-965. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2022.07.008. Epub 2022 Jul 22.
7
Effect of Cefepime/Enmetazobactam vs Piperacillin/Tazobactam on Clinical Cure and Microbiological Eradication in Patients With Complicated Urinary Tract Infection or Acute Pyelonephritis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.头孢吡肟/恩他唑巴坦对比哌拉西林/他唑巴坦治疗复杂性尿路感染或急性肾盂肾炎患者的临床疗效和微生物学清除率:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2022 Oct 4;328(13):1304-1314. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.17034.
8
Comparative Incidence of Acute Kidney Injury in Critically Ill Patients Receiving Vancomycin with Concomitant Piperacillin-Tazobactam or Cefepime: A Retrospective Cohort Study.接受万古霉素联合哌拉西林 - 他唑巴坦或头孢吡肟的重症患者急性肾损伤的比较发病率:一项回顾性队列研究
Pharmacotherapy. 2016 May;36(5):463-71. doi: 10.1002/phar.1738. Epub 2016 Apr 1.
9
Incidence of Acute Kidney Injury in Critically Ill Patients Receiving Vancomycin with Concomitant Piperacillin-Tazobactam, Cefepime, or Meropenem.重症患者同时接受哌拉西林他唑巴坦、头孢吡肟或美罗培南联合万古霉素治疗时急性肾损伤的发生率。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2019 Apr 25;63(5). doi: 10.1128/AAC.02658-18. Print 2019 May.
10
Outcomes of treating AmpC-producing Enterobacterales bacteraemia with carbapenems vs. non-carbapenems.碳青霉烯类与非碳青霉烯类治疗产 AmpC 肠杆菌科血流感染的结局比较。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020 Feb;55(2):105860. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2019.105860. Epub 2019 Dec 11.

本文引用的文献

1
Cefepime vs Piperacillin-Tazobactam in Adults Hospitalized With Acute Infection: The ACORN Randomized Clinical Trial.头孢吡肟与哌拉西林-他唑巴坦治疗成人急性感染的疗效比较:ACORN 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2023 Oct 24;330(16):1557-1567. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.20583.
2
Impact of macrolide treatment on long-term mortality in patients admitted to the ICU due to CAP: a targeted maximum likelihood estimation and survival analysis.大环内酯类药物治疗对因 CAP 入住 ICU 患者的长期死亡率的影响:靶向极大似然估计和生存分析。
Crit Care. 2023 May 31;27(1):212. doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04466-x.
3
MIMIC-IV, a freely accessible electronic health record dataset.
MIMIC-IV,一个可自由访问的电子健康记录数据集。
Sci Data. 2023 Jan 3;10(1):1. doi: 10.1038/s41597-022-01899-x.
4
Choosing antibiotic therapy for severe community-acquired pneumonia.选择抗生素治疗严重社区获得性肺炎。
Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2022 Apr 1;35(2):133-139. doi: 10.1097/QCO.0000000000000819.
5
A Comparison Between Cefepime and Piperacillin-Tazobactam in the Management of Septic Shock.头孢吡肟与哌拉西林-他唑巴坦治疗感染性休克的比较
Cureus. 2021 Oct 13;13(10):e18742. doi: 10.7759/cureus.18742. eCollection 2021 Oct.
6
Cefepime-Induced Neurotoxicity.头孢吡肟诱发的神经毒性。
Cureus. 2021 Sep 8;13(9):e17831. doi: 10.7759/cureus.17831. eCollection 2021 Sep.
7
Cefepime/tazobactam compared with other tazobactam combinations against problem Gram-negative bacteria.头孢吡肟/他唑巴坦与其他他唑巴坦联合用药针对难治革兰氏阴性菌的比较。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2021 May;57(5):106318. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2021.106318. Epub 2021 Mar 11.
8
Risk Factor Evaluation for Methicillin-Resistant and in Community-Acquired Pneumonia.社区获得性肺炎耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌和 感染的危险因素评估。
Ann Pharmacother. 2021 Jan;55(1):36-43. doi: 10.1177/1060028020935106. Epub 2020 Jun 16.
9
Acute kidney injury following the concurrent administration of antipseudomonal β-lactams and vancomycin: a network meta-analysis.同时使用抗假单胞菌β-内酰胺类药物和万古霉素后发生的急性肾损伤:一项网状荟萃分析。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2020 Jun;26(6):696-705. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.03.019. Epub 2020 Mar 25.
10
Diagnosis and Treatment of Adults with Community-acquired Pneumonia. An Official Clinical Practice Guideline of the American Thoracic Society and Infectious Diseases Society of America.成人社区获得性肺炎诊断和治疗。美国胸科学会和美国传染病学会的官方临床实践指南。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019 Oct 1;200(7):e45-e67. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201908-1581ST.