Fang Lanyan, Li Zhichuan, Kinjo Minori, Lomonaco Sara, Zheng Nan, Jiang Wenlei, Zhao Liang
Office of Research and Standards, Office of Generic Drugs, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Office of Clinical Pharmacology, Office of Translational Sciences, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Epilepsia. 2023 Jan;64(1):152-161. doi: 10.1111/epi.17438. Epub 2022 Nov 10.
Lamotrigine is a commonly prescribed antiepileptic drug. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-funded clinical studies have demonstrated bioequivalence (BE) for generic lamotrigine immediate-release (IR) products in epilepsy patients with generic substitution. To address the potential concerns about the risk of generic-brand substitution of lamotrigine extended-release (ER) products, considering the complexity of controlled release systems and pharmacokinetic variations associated with possible within-subject variability (WSV), this prospective study assessed (1) BE of generic and brand lamotrigine ER products in a fully replicated BE study design in healthy subjects and (2) whether such fully replicated study design and WSV data can better support the approval of generic lamotrigine ER products.
This open-label, single-dose, two-treatment, four-period, two-sequence, fully replicated crossover BE study compared generic lamotrigine ER tablet to brand Lamictal XR (200 mg) in 30 healthy subjects under fed conditions. Pharmacokinetics (PK) profiles were generated based on intensive blood sampling up to 144 h.
The two products showed comparable peak plasma concentration (C ), area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) from time zero to the last measurable time point (AUC ) and AUC extrapolated to infinity (AUC ), whereas median time to C (T ) values differed, that is, 10 h for generic and 22 h for brand products, respectively. WSVs for PK metrics were small (~8% of C and ~6% of AUC) and similar between these two products. PK simulation predicted equivalent PK measurements of both products at steady state and after brand-to-generic switch, except the first day upon switching. No serious adverse events were reported.
The generic lamotrigine ER tablet product demonstrates BE to the brand product in a fully replicated BE study design with healthy subjects, supporting the adequacy of the two-way crossover study design to demonstrate BE and generic-brand substitution of lamotrigine ER products.
拉莫三嗪是一种常用的抗癫痫药物。美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)资助的临床研究已证明,在癫痫患者中,通用型拉莫三嗪速释(IR)产品进行通用名替换时具有生物等效性(BE)。考虑到控释系统的复杂性以及与可能的受试者内变异性(WSV)相关的药代动力学变化,为解决对拉莫三嗪缓释(ER)产品通用名替换风险的潜在担忧,本前瞻性研究评估了:(1)在健康受试者中采用完全重复的BE研究设计,通用型和品牌型拉莫三嗪ER产品的生物等效性;(2)这种完全重复的研究设计和WSV数据是否能更好地支持通用型拉莫三嗪ER产品的批准。
本开放标签、单剂量、双治疗、四周期、双序列、完全重复的交叉BE研究,在30名健康受试者进食条件下,将通用型拉莫三嗪ER片与品牌药拉莫三嗪缓释片(200mg)进行比较。基于长达144小时的密集采血生成药代动力学(PK)曲线。
两种产品的血浆峰浓度(C)、从零时间到最后可测量时间点的浓度-时间曲线下面积(AUC)以及外推至无穷大的AUC相当,而达到C的中位时间(T)值不同,即通用型产品为10小时,品牌型产品为22小时。两种产品的PK指标的WSV较小(C约为8%,AUC约为6%)且相似。PK模拟预测,两种产品在稳态时以及品牌药转换为通用药后(转换后的第一天除外)的PK测量结果相当。未报告严重不良事件。
在针对健康受试者的完全重复的BE研究设计中,通用型拉莫三嗪ER片产品与品牌产品具有生物等效性,支持双向交叉研究设计足以证明拉莫三嗪ER产品的生物等效性和通用名替换。