• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在胸腔积液细胞学检查中 BerEp4/calretinin 和 desmin/上皮膜抗原(EMA)双重免疫细胞化学染色的效用。

Utility of BerEp4/calretinin and desmin/epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) dual immunocytochemical staining in effusion cytology.

机构信息

Division of Pathology, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Faculty of Medicine, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Eskisehir, Turkey.

出版信息

Cancer Med. 2023 Mar;12(5):5334-5340. doi: 10.1002/cam4.5353. Epub 2022 Oct 19.

DOI:10.1002/cam4.5353
PMID:36259232
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10028146/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pleural mesothelioma (PM) is typically diagnosed late during the disease. Earlier detection can increase the chance of effective therapy. Recurrent pleural effusions are the earliest symptoms displaying an array of cytomorphological changes from reactive atypia to malignancy. Diagnosis is possible on effusion cytology by applying molecular and immunocytochemical markers, the main difficulty being when to suspect PM and to differentiate PM from metastatic adenocarcinoma and reactive mesothelial proliferations.

METHODS

We evaluated the diagnostic performance of two immunocytochemical dual stains (BerEp4/Calretinin and Desmin/Epithelial Membrane Antigen (EMA)) on 149 ethanol-fixed cytospin preparation as an initial step to solve the mentioned diagnostic difficulty. The immunocytochemical reactivity pattern was evaluated by two independent investigators. The final diagnosis corresponded to PM (n = 20), metastatic adenocarcinoma (n = 83), and mesotheliosis (n = 46) in these cases.

RESULTS

Calretinin had 99% specificity and 98% sensitivity for indicating a mesothelial phenotype, while BerEp4 distinguished the adenocarcinoma cases with 98% specificity and 99% sensitivity. EMA displayed 96% specificity and 99% sensitivity in malignant cases, while Desmin without EMA present showed 99% specificity and 96% sensitivity for indicating benign mesothelial proliferation.

CONCLUSIONS

Interpretation of the four immunoreactions is improved when performed as dual stains. The dual staining is a useful tool in the initial handling of atypical effusions and guides the subsequent choice of antibody panels for more detailed subclassification of malignant effusions.

摘要

背景

胸膜间皮瘤(PM)通常在疾病晚期诊断。早期发现可以增加有效治疗的机会。复发性胸腔积液是最早出现一系列从反应性异型性到恶性的细胞形态学变化的症状。通过应用分子和免疫细胞化学标志物,可以在胸腔积液细胞学检查中进行诊断,主要困难在于何时怀疑 PM 并将 PM 与转移性腺癌和反应性间皮增生区分开来。

方法

我们评估了两种免疫细胞化学双重染色(BerEp4/Calretinin 和 Desmin/Epithelial Membrane Antigen (EMA))在 149 例乙醇固定细胞旋涂标本上的诊断性能,作为解决上述诊断困难的初始步骤。两名独立的研究者评估了免疫细胞化学反应模式。最终诊断为 PM(n=20)、转移性腺癌(n=83)和间皮瘤(n=46)。

结果

Calretinin 对指示间皮表型的特异性为 99%,敏感性为 98%,而 BerEp4 则以 98%的特异性和 99%的敏感性区分腺癌病例。EMA 在恶性病例中显示出 96%的特异性和 99%的敏感性,而没有 EMA 存在的 Desmin 对指示良性间皮增生的特异性为 99%,敏感性为 96%。

结论

当作为双重染色进行时,对四种免疫反应的解释得到了改善。双重染色是处理非典型胸腔积液的初始有用工具,并指导随后选择抗体面板对恶性胸腔积液进行更详细的分类。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b779/10028146/c88ac2ab3839/CAM4-12-5334-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b779/10028146/c88ac2ab3839/CAM4-12-5334-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b779/10028146/c88ac2ab3839/CAM4-12-5334-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Utility of BerEp4/calretinin and desmin/epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) dual immunocytochemical staining in effusion cytology.在胸腔积液细胞学检查中 BerEp4/calretinin 和 desmin/上皮膜抗原(EMA)双重免疫细胞化学染色的效用。
Cancer Med. 2023 Mar;12(5):5334-5340. doi: 10.1002/cam4.5353. Epub 2022 Oct 19.
2
[A comparative evaluation of immunohistochemical markers for the differential diagnosis between malignant mesothelioma, non-small cell carcinoma involving the pleura, and benign reactive mesothelial cell proliferation].[用于恶性间皮瘤、累及胸膜的非小细胞癌及良性反应性间皮细胞增生鉴别诊断的免疫组化标志物的比较评估]
Pneumonol Alergol Pol. 2007;75(1):57-69.
3
The diagnostic utility of D2-40, calretinin, CK5/6, desmin and MOC-31 in the differentiation of mesothelioma from adenocarcinoma in pleural effusion cytology.D2-40、钙视网膜蛋白、细胞角蛋白5/6、结蛋白和MOC-31在胸腔积液细胞学中鉴别间皮瘤与腺癌的诊断效用。
Acta Cytol. 2012;56(5):527-32. doi: 10.1159/000339586. Epub 2012 Sep 27.
4
Diagnostic usefulness of EMA, IMP3, and GLUT-1 for the immunocytochemical distinction of malignant cells from reactive mesothelial cells in effusion cytology using cytospin preparations.在利用细胞离心涂片制备的积液细胞学检查中,EMA、IMP3和GLUT-1在免疫细胞化学鉴别恶性细胞与反应性间皮细胞方面的诊断价值。
Diagn Cytopathol. 2011 Jun;39(6):395-401. doi: 10.1002/dc.21398. Epub 2010 May 27.
5
Distinguishing benign from malignant mesothelial cells in effusions by Glut-1, EMA, and Desmin expression: an evidence-based approach.通过Glut-1、EMA和结蛋白表达鉴别积液中良性与恶性间皮细胞:一种基于证据的方法。
Diagn Cytopathol. 2013 Feb;41(2):131-40. doi: 10.1002/dc.21800. Epub 2011 Aug 26.
6
Cytologic malignancy versus benignancy: how useful are the "newer" markers in body fluid cytology?细胞恶性与良性:体液细胞学中“新型”标志物的作用有多大?
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2008 Jan;132(1):23-8. doi: 10.5858/2008-132-23-CMVBHU.
7
Diagnostic value of BRCA1-associated protein-1, glucose transporter-1 and desmin expression in the discrimination between reactive mesothelial proliferation and malignant mesothelioma in tissues and effusions.BRCA1相关蛋白-1、葡萄糖转运蛋白-1和结蛋白表达在鉴别组织和积液中反应性间皮增生与恶性间皮瘤方面的诊断价值
Cytopathology. 2019 Nov;30(6):592-600. doi: 10.1111/cyt.12738. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
8
The use of immunohistochemistry to distinguish reactive mesothelial cells from malignant mesothelioma in cytologic effusions.免疫组织化学在细胞学渗出液中鉴别反应性间皮细胞与恶性间皮瘤。
Cancer Cytopathol. 2010 Apr 25;118(2):90-6. doi: 10.1002/cncy.20071.
9
Reactivity of six antibodies in effusions of mesothelioma, adenocarcinoma and mesotheliosis: stepwise logistic regression analysis.六种抗体在间皮瘤、腺癌及间皮病积液中的反应性:逐步逻辑回归分析
Cytopathology. 2000 Feb;11(1):8-17. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2303.2000.00211.x.
10
Cytological differential diagnosis among adenocarcinoma, epithelial mesothelioma, and reactive mesothelial cells in serous effusions by immunocytochemistry.通过免疫细胞化学对浆液性积液中腺癌、上皮性间皮瘤和反应性间皮细胞进行细胞学鉴别诊断。
Diagn Cytopathol. 2011 Dec;39(12):900-8. doi: 10.1002/dc.21489. Epub 2010 Sep 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Performance of the Monoclonal Antibody B72.3 in Diagnosis of Malignant Carcinomatous Serous Effusions-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Performance.单克隆抗体B72.3在恶性癌性浆液性胸腔积液诊断中的性能——诊断性能的系统评价和荟萃分析
Cytopathology. 2025 Jul;36(4):399-407. doi: 10.1111/cyt.13493. Epub 2025 Apr 10.
2
The Role of Immunohistochemistry in Reducing the "Atypia of Undetermined Significance (AUS)" Category in Serous Fluid Cytology.免疫组织化学在减少浆液性液体细胞学中“意义未明的非典型性(AUS)”类别方面的作用。
J Cytol. 2025 Jan-Mar;42(1):43-47. doi: 10.4103/joc.joc_212_23. Epub 2025 Feb 11.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Effusion cytology of malignant mesothelioma enables earlier diagnosis and recognizes patients with better prognosis.恶性间皮瘤的细胞学渗出液检查有助于更早诊断,并能识别出预后较好的患者。
Diagn Cytopathol. 2021 May;49(5):606-614. doi: 10.1002/dc.24395. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
2
Diagnostic value of BRCA1-associated protein-1, glucose transporter-1 and desmin expression in the discrimination between reactive mesothelial proliferation and malignant mesothelioma in tissues and effusions.BRCA1相关蛋白-1、葡萄糖转运蛋白-1和结蛋白表达在鉴别组织和积液中反应性间皮增生与恶性间皮瘤方面的诊断价值
Cytopathology. 2019 Nov;30(6):592-600. doi: 10.1111/cyt.12738. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
3
Diagnostic Challenges in the Pathological Approach to Pleural Mesothelioma.
胸膜间皮瘤病理诊断方法中的挑战
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Feb 1;17(3):481. doi: 10.3390/cancers17030481.
4
Malignant mesothelioma tumours: molecular pathogenesis, diagnosis, and therapies accompanying clinical studies.恶性间皮瘤肿瘤:分子发病机制、诊断及伴随临床研究的治疗方法
Front Oncol. 2023 Jul 4;13:1204722. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1204722. eCollection 2023.
Cytopathologic Diagnosis of Epithelioid and Mixed-Type Malignant Mesothelioma: Ten Years of Clinical Experience in Relation to International Guidelines.
上皮样和混合细胞型恶性间皮瘤的细胞病理学诊断:与国际指南相关的十年临床经验。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2018 Aug;142(8):893-901. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2018-0020-RA.
4
Loss of BRCA1-associated protein 1 (BAP1) expression is useful in diagnostic cytopathology of malignant mesothelioma in effusions.BRCA1相关蛋白1(BAP1)表达缺失在积液中恶性间皮瘤的诊断性细胞病理学中具有应用价值。
Diagn Cytopathol. 2018 Jan;46(1):9-14. doi: 10.1002/dc.23837. Epub 2017 Oct 10.
5
Immunohistochemical detection of MTAP and BAP1 protein loss for mesothelioma diagnosis: Comparison with 9p21 FISH and BAP1 immunohistochemistry.免疫组化检测 MTAP 和 BAP1 蛋白缺失在间皮瘤诊断中的应用:与 9p21 FISH 和 BAP1 免疫组化的比较。
Lung Cancer. 2017 Feb;104:98-105. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2016.12.017. Epub 2016 Dec 23.
6
Utility of BRCA1-associated protein 1 immunoperoxidase stain to differentiate benign versus malignant mesothelial proliferations in cytologic specimens.BRCA1相关蛋白1免疫过氧化物酶染色在鉴别细胞学标本中良性与恶性间皮增生方面的效用。
Diagn Cytopathol. 2017 Apr;45(4):312-319. doi: 10.1002/dc.23683. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
7
Comparison of outcomes following a cytological or histological diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma.恶性间皮瘤细胞学或组织学诊断后的结局比较。
Br J Cancer. 2017 Mar 14;116(6):703-708. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2017.20. Epub 2017 Feb 14.
8
Diagnostic efficacy of electron microscopy and pleural effusion cytology for the distinction of pleural mesothelioma and lung adenocarcinoma.电子显微镜检查和胸腔积液细胞学检查对鉴别胸膜间皮瘤和肺腺癌的诊断效能
Ultrastruct Pathol. 2016 Sep-Oct;40(5):254-60. doi: 10.1080/01913123.2016.1195469. Epub 2016 Jul 12.
9
Guidelines for the cytopathologic diagnosis of epithelioid and mixed-type malignant mesothelioma. Complementary statement from the International Mesothelioma Interest Group, also endorsed by the International Academy of Cytology and the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology.上皮样和混合型恶性间皮瘤的细胞病理学诊断指南。国际间皮瘤兴趣小组的补充声明,也得到了国际细胞学会和帕潘尼古拉乌细胞病理学协会的认可。
Acta Cytol. 2015;59(1):2-16. doi: 10.1159/000377697. Epub 2015 Mar 24.
10
Diagnostic accuracy of calretinin for malignant mesothelioma in serous effusions: a meta-analysis.钙视网膜蛋白对浆液性积液中恶性间皮瘤的诊断准确性:一项荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2015 Mar 30;5:9507. doi: 10.1038/srep09507.