Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Division of External Relations, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2022 Oct 19;104(Suppl 3):4-8. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.22.00620.
The availability of large state and federally run administrative health-care databases provides potentially comprehensive population-wide information that can dramatically impact both medical and health-policy decision-making. Specific opportunities and important limitations exist with all administrative databases based on what information is collected and how reliably specific data elements are reported. Access to patient identifiable-level information can be critical for certain long-term outcome studies but can be difficult (although not impossible) due to patient privacy protections, while more easily available de-identified information can provide important insights that may be more than sufficient for some short-term operative or in-hospital outcome questions. The first section of this paper by Sarah K. Meier and Benjamin D. Pollock discusses Medicare and the different data files available to health-care researchers. They describe what is and is not generally available from even the most granular Medicare Standard Analytic Files, and provide an analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of Medicare administrative data as well as the resulting best and inappropriate uses of these data. In the second section, the Nationwide Inpatient Sample and complementary State Inpatient Database programs are reviewed by Steven M. Kurtz and Edmund Lau, with insights into the origins of these programs, the data elements that are recorded relating to the operative procedure and hospital stay, and examples of the types of studies that optimally utilize these data sources. They also detail the limitations of these databases and identify studies that they are not well-suited for, especially those involving linkage or longitudinal studies over time. Both sections provide useful guidance on the best uses and pitfalls related to these important large representative national administrative data sources.
大型州和联邦管理式医疗保健数据库的可用性提供了潜在的全面人群信息,这可能会对医疗和卫生政策决策产生重大影响。所有管理式数据库都存在具体的机会和重要的局限性,具体取决于收集了哪些信息以及特定数据元素的报告可靠性如何。访问患者可识别级别的信息对于某些长期结果研究至关重要,但由于患者隐私保护,可能会很困难(尽管并非不可能),而更容易获得的去识别信息可以提供重要的见解,对于某些短期手术或住院期间的结果问题可能已经足够了。Sarah K. Meier 和 Benjamin D. Pollock 的这篇论文的第一部分讨论了医疗保险以及可供医疗保健研究人员使用的不同数据文件。他们描述了即使是最细粒度的 Medicare Standard Analytic Files 也通常无法提供哪些信息,并对医疗保险管理数据的优缺点以及这些数据的最佳和不当用途进行了分析。在第二部分,Steven M. Kurtz 和 Edmund Lau 审查了全国住院患者样本和补充州住院患者数据库计划,介绍了这些计划的起源、与手术程序和住院相关的记录数据元素,以及最佳利用这些数据源的研究类型示例。他们还详细说明了这些数据库的局限性,并确定了它们不适合的研究,特别是那些涉及链接或随时间进行的纵向研究。这两个部分都提供了有关这些重要的大型代表性全国管理式数据源的最佳用途和陷阱的有用指导。