School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia.
Perinatal HIV Research Unit (PHRU), University of the Witwatersrand.
J Sex Res. 2024 Jan;61(1):144-159. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2022.2129561. Epub 2022 Oct 19.
Efforts to advance sexual health globally require greater understandings of youth intimate relationship dynamics. Among 38 South African youth (21 women/17 men aged 21-30 from Durban and Soweto) we conducted qualitative cognitive interviews to explore how gender and power intersect to shape intimate relationship dynamics (October 2019-March 2021). Participants discussed perceptions and relevance of each of 13 items comprising the Sexual Relationship Power (SRP) scale, a widely used measure of gender equity, and the influence of SRP on youth sexual health. Data analysis was guided by constructivist grounded theory. The findings were organized using the socio-ecological model, revealing how gender and power intersected at multiple levels to influence youth intimate relationships. Key influencing factors included individual-level gender attitudes, male partner expectations, and women's resistance to dominance; intimate relationship-level power dynamics, consent, and intimacy; family-level household configurations and parental monitoring of daughters; and societal-level traditional gender norms. At all levels, women discussed resisting power inequities through communication and rejection of inequitable relationships. While men also displayed resistance to inequitable power structures, most upheld traditional gender norms through institutional affiliation (e.g. church) and deep-rooted socialized beliefs and attitudes. Efforts to improve youth sexual health require multileveled approaches that address inequitable power dynamics.
为了促进全球的性健康,我们需要更深入地了解年轻人的亲密关系动态。在南非的 38 名年轻人(21 名女性/17 名男性,年龄在 21-30 岁之间,分别来自德班和索韦托)中,我们进行了定性认知访谈,以探讨性别和权力如何相互交织,塑造亲密关系动态(2019 年 10 月至 2021 年 3 月)。参与者讨论了包含 13 项的性关系权力(SRP)量表的每个项目的看法和相关性,该量表是衡量性别平等的广泛使用的工具,以及 SRP 对年轻人性健康的影响。数据分析以建构主义扎根理论为指导。研究结果按照社会生态模型组织,揭示了性别和权力如何在多个层面相互交织,影响年轻人的亲密关系。关键的影响因素包括个人层面的性别态度、男性伴侣的期望以及女性对支配的抵制;亲密关系层面的权力动态、同意和亲密;家庭层面的家庭结构和父母对女儿的监督;以及社会层面的传统性别规范。在所有层面上,女性都讨论了通过沟通和拒绝不平等的关系来抵制权力不平等。虽然男性也表现出对不平等权力结构的抵制,但大多数人通过机构附属(如教会)以及根深蒂固的社会化信念和态度来维护传统的性别规范。改善年轻人性健康需要采取多层次的方法来解决不平等的权力动态。