Tang Shu, Wu Zhanshen, Xu Liqing, Wen Qiang, Zhang Xiaojian
Department of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Oct 3;13:970066. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.970066. eCollection 2022.
Ticagrelor and clopidogrel are commonly used antiplatelet agents, and we conducted a pharmacovigilance analysis using the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) to provide a reference for safe and reasonable clinical use. Data were collected in FAERS from 2012 Q1 to 2022 Q2 for data cleaning. We used system organ classes (SOCs) and prefer terms (PTs) from the Medical Dictionary of Regulatory Activity (MedDRA version 25.1). Adverse event reports were retrieved at the PT level. Adverse reaction (ADR) signals of ticagrelor and clopidogrel were mined by calculating reporting odds ratios (ROR), proportional reporting ratios (PRR), information component (IC) and empirical Bayesian geometric mean (EBGM). After that, further analysis of the hemorrhagic signals and their clinical information were performed. The number of ADR reports where the primary suspect (PS) drugs were 15,133 for ticagrelor and 23,860 for clopidogrel. Significant ADR signals were identified by the SOC analysis for ticagrelor including cardiac disorders (ROR 4.87, PRR 4.46), respiratory disorders (ROR 2.45, PRR 2.28), and vascular disorders (ROR 2.22, PRR 2.16). Clopidogrel included blood disorders (ROR 2.86, PRR 2.77), vascular disorders (ROR 2.71, PRR 2.61), and cardiac disorders (ROR 2.29, PRR 2.22). At the PT level, the more frequent ADR signals for ticagrelor were dyspnoea, contusion, and haemorrhage, while clopidogrel were gastrointestinal haemorrhage, anaemia, and drug interaction. The hemorrhagic signals of both were mainly focused on the SOC level of gastrointestinal disorders, injury disorders and vascular disorders and nervous system disorders. The death and life-threatening rate of ticagrelor was 7.76 percentage higher than that of clopidogrel. Clinicians need to pay attention to not only common ADRs but also be alert to new ADR signals when choosing to use ticagrelor and clopidogrel. This study provides a reference for the reasonable and safe clinical use of ticagrelor and clopidogrel.
替格瑞洛和氯吡格雷是常用的抗血小板药物,我们使用美国食品药品监督管理局不良事件报告系统(FAERS)进行了药物警戒分析,为临床安全合理用药提供参考。从FAERS中收集了2012年第一季度至2022年第二季度的数据进行数据清理。我们使用了来自《监管活动医学词典》(MedDRA版本25.1)的系统器官分类(SOCs)和首选术语(PTs)。在PT级别检索不良事件报告。通过计算报告比值比(ROR)、比例报告比值(PRR)、信息成分(IC)和经验贝叶斯几何均值(EBGM)来挖掘替格瑞洛和氯吡格雷的不良反应(ADR)信号。之后,对出血信号及其临床信息进行了进一步分析。以替格瑞洛为主要怀疑(PS)药物的ADR报告数量为15133份,以氯吡格雷为主要怀疑药物的为23860份。通过SOC分析确定替格瑞洛的显著ADR信号包括心脏疾病(ROR 4.87,PRR 4.46)、呼吸系统疾病(ROR 2.45,PRR 2.28)和血管疾病(ROR 2.22,PRR 2.16)。氯吡格雷的显著ADR信号包括血液疾病(ROR 2.86,PRR 2.77)、血管疾病(ROR 2.71,PRR 2.61)和心脏疾病(ROR 2.29,PRR 2.22)。在PT级别,替格瑞洛更常见的ADR信号为呼吸困难、挫伤和出血,而氯吡格雷的为胃肠道出血、贫血和药物相互作用。两者的出血信号主要集中在胃肠道疾病、损伤疾病、血管疾病和神经系统疾病的SOC级别。替格瑞洛的死亡和危及生命率比氯吡格雷高7.76个百分点。临床医生在选择使用替格瑞洛和氯吡格雷时,不仅要关注常见的ADR,还要警惕新的ADR信号。本研究为替格瑞洛和氯吡格雷的临床合理安全使用提供了参考。